Niemand303 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 You know, those could be used for a Bigelow like space station with porkjet's habitation modules.I've tried to make them more Mir-alike, based on the 3-view I found. And I guess they can be used for most of Soviet-like station design. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reichtangle Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 I've tried to make them more Mir-alike, based on the 3-view I found. And I guess they can be used for most of Soviet-like station design.But Bigelow aerospace is american. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 LOK test! Ships: Tantares, Launcher: NovaPunch2, Fairings: KWRocketry.If Tantares pack was a girl I'd marry her!http://imgur.com/a/nqwCQThe best gallery I've seen, really made my day! (Really nice details around the LOK docking port)Definitely going to do this myself when I have a chance (Got the SXT N1 on standby...)Can I ask what graphics mods you are using? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niemand303 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Definitely going to do this myself when I have a chance (Got the SXT N1 on standby...)Not to be rude, I really love Lack's work on SXT (and I'm personally thankful to him for helping me with Blender and Unity), but the engines on its N1 are kinda unbalanced, so I'd recommend the one from NovaPunch2 pack. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwayne1930 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 @BealeThe "Farshot" has no ModuleGimbal, is that right?But beside that, a really nice engine you made there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 Not to be rude, I really love Lack's work on SXT (and I'm personally thankful to him for helping me with Blender and Unity), but the engines on its N1 are kinda unbalanced, so I'd recommend the one from NovaPunch2 pack.Hmm, really? I'll be sure to give it a try. I've only used the SXT one so far due to RAM issues.@BealeThe "Farshot" has no ModuleGimbal, is that right?But beside that, a really nice engine you made there. Thanks It does lack ModuleGimbal on purpose, though I'm open to feedback on this I reckon that the engine should have had some drawback (In general it's better than the standard Tantares OMS in every way).What do people think? Gimbal or no Gimbal? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnwayne1930 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Gimbal or no Gimbal?I really don't know if its necessary.I just noticed after checking the config because most engines have the module. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lexx Thai Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Gimbal or no Gimbal?No Gimbal, obviously - it's orbital engine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niemand303 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Can I ask what graphics mods you are using?EVE + Astronomer's Pack v5 + Texture Replacer + Specialists Suits. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niemand303 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 (edited) What do people think? Gimbal or no Gimbal?No, I think everything is fine with it, gimbal isn't much needed for service modules. Also, I feel a bit greedy to ask, but docking ports with radial attachment will be great for building stations. Edited September 12, 2014 by Niemand303 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 12, 2014 Author Share Posted September 12, 2014 (edited) EVE + Astronomer's Pack v5 + Texture Replacer + Specialists Suits.No, I think everything is fine with it, gimbal isn't much needed for service modules. Also, I feel a bit greedy to ask, but docking ports with radial attachment will be great for building stations. Thanks for the graphical configs I imagine the ports (well, only the female one) will be made radial some point soon. The models need a "tube" that stretches from the bottom (like the stock ports), so that's what is holding me off at this point.Also from the feedback I guess a Gimbal update isn't needed. Edited September 12, 2014 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kopapaka Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 (edited) Nice and thanks... (8.0)Test "R-7" and HAMAL "nuclear warhead"... Edited September 12, 2014 by kopapaka Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny88 Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Quick question: What are the things sticking out on the sides of farshot engine? And where are they located in the ship building menu? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reichtangle Posted September 12, 2014 Share Posted September 12, 2014 Hmm, really? I'll be sure to give it a try. I've only used the SXT one so far due to RAM issues.Thanks It does lack ModuleGimbal on purpose, though I'm open to feedback on this I reckon that the engine should have had some drawback (In general it's better than the standard Tantares OMS in every way).What do people think? Gimbal or no Gimbal?0.25 degree gimbal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DGatsby Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Oh man Beale, every time I start to think about role-playing a super modern/futuristic game of Kerbal you release something awesome that keeps me firmly rooted in the Soviet/Russia heyday of space travel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny88 Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 To Duna with LOK!Who's the leader of the club that's made for you and me? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Horus Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Minor question (NO NEED to hurry & fix this at once):Tantares_Orbital_A has no ModuleCommand for a reason? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 13, 2014 Author Share Posted September 13, 2014 Nice and thanks... (8.0)Test "R-7" and HAMAL "nuclear warhead"...http://img13.rajce.idnes.cz/d1302/9/9855/9855668_e811471d098d0e17052ee590c2cf3157/images/screenshot62_2.jpg?ver=0That's a new usage Quick question: What are the things sticking out on the sides of farshot engine? And where are they located in the ship building menu?They're the 500km Remote Tech 2 Antennas! Oh man Beale, every time I start to think about role-playing a super modern/futuristic game of Kerbal you release something awesome that keeps me firmly rooted in the Soviet/Russia heyday of space travel.Hobbyists today drive classic cars. Hobbyists tomorrow drive classic spaceships, role-play away!Minor question (NO NEED to hurry & fix this at once):Tantares_Orbital_A has no ModuleCommand for a reason?The real Soyuz Orbital module can't operate by itself and it's depressurized after release. So I don't think it should to be honest. Shenzou orbital module can, on the other hand.Hope this answers you http://i.imgur.com/FdMGpvP.pngTo Duna with LOK!http://i.imgur.com/xMCrNI5.pngWho's the leader of the club that's made for you and me?Very cool to see it taken a bit out of its comfort zone! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZodiaK Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Speaking of shenzou, is there any chance that the shenzou OM will be made? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 13, 2014 Author Share Posted September 13, 2014 Speaking of shenzou, is there any chance that the shenzou OM will be made?I've considered the Longxing over the Shenzou.I personally find it better looking. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Rhodan Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Speaking of shenzou, is there any chance that the shenzou OM will be made?Or the PPTS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arvolder Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 PPTS Is a good Idea. I love it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLUAV8R Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Yeah a PPTS would be awesome Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted September 13, 2014 Author Share Posted September 13, 2014 (edited) Or the PPTS.PPTS Is a good Idea. I love it Yeah a PPTS would be awesome I see the enthusiasm, but the PPTS is not really workable in stock sizes (Including 1.875m) to be in proportion. This is why I've kinda held off it.If someone can suggest me a way it can be done (in the right proportion whilst sticking to standard port sizes), then sure I'd like to make the PPTS.Actually, it looks to be possible using a 2.5m base, could be done at some point! Edited September 13, 2014 by Beale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ste1701 Posted September 13, 2014 Share Posted September 13, 2014 Old LOK/LK vs. new one. Who will win? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.