Technicality requirement of scientific papers.

[mardlamock]

BTW, have you explored forums like these: http://www.rocketrysouthcarolina.com/forum.php?

That's just the first thing to come up when I Googled; you can probably find something local-ish if you look.

I have, there is one rocketry club I tried to contact but it seems they are not active.

[Wanderfound]

I have, there is one rocketry club I tried to contact but it seems they are not active.

The internet makes the world smaller; local is good, but not necessary. Find an active club and ask them for book recommendations etc.

So long as you don't make a nuisance of yourself, they'll probably be keen to help. Geeks tend to be evangelical about their geekery.

[jwenting]

I'm breathtakingly useless at calculus [1], and I got by just fine [2] in behavioural neuroscience and psychopharmacology. Whether those count or not is going to depend on your definition of "physical sciences", but it's worth remembering that not all science is physics.

doesn't matter so much if you're not good at it, but if you're too young to even had instruction in it...

[mardlamock]

doesn't matter so much if you're not good at it, but if you're too young to even had instruction in it...

So does that mean that according to you I cannot possibly understand it? In the US I would be preparing for AP exams, its just my school's ....ty math education that means I wont learn it formally until next year.

[Wanderfound]

So does that mean that according to you I cannot possibly understand it? In the US I would be preparing for AP exams, its just my school's ....ty math education that means I wont learn it formally until next year.

Thoroughly endorsed; get ahead of the curve.

Half of the reason that I cruised through university so easily is that the topic of each subject was usually covered by a book I'd read for fun the year before.