Jump to content

Scientists Make Breakthrough In 'Telepathy'


The Jedi Master

Recommended Posts

Before you ask, my source is BBC News. There is an interview, and this is the text underneath the audio player:

Research led by experts at Harvard University shows technology can be used to send a simple mental message from one person to another without any contact between the two.

Neuroscientist Giulio Ruffini told the Today programme: "You can actually transmit information directly from one brain to another brain without intervention of the senses."

"The next step would be to try to find more powerful techniques to send more complex information," he added.

What is your opinion? Greatest discovery of our time? Interesting oddity? Just a false positive? If you ask me, this might be false, but at least it's from reputable sources, which leads me to believe in at least the possibility of truth. But what do you think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, actually it is not really like we would imagine telepathy ...

EEG scan "reads" the thoughts, file is sent via eMail and then via tDCS (or similar brain stimulation) "sent" into the receivers brain ... see here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/11077094/Brain-to-brain-telepathic-communication-achieved-for-first-time.html

Nevertheless it is extremly interesting

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trouble is, even if this works, I think it would take a VERY long time to establish a reliable connection between two people.

From what I know about how the brain works, the signal from every person, even if they concentrated on the same thing, would look very different. So if two people wanted to do this with each other, they'd need to spend a lot of time on it, giving their brains ample time to interpret the signal into something they could 'read.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems like it isn´t as sensational as I thought ...

if I understand this correctly, the sender just thinks of a series of movements that symbolizes 0 and another one that symbolizes 1.

He then thinks of a string of movement sequences that symbolizes the binary representation of the word that he wants to send.

The computer does the EEG scan of the motor cortex and constructs a bit vector out of the string of movements the sender thinks (ideally correctly getting the binary representation of the word hat is to be sent).

Then the Bit Vector is sent and the receiver computer uses TMS to send pulses to the receivers lobus occipitalis, in a way that the receiver sees a light flash in his peripheral field of vision for every binary 1.

This way bit per bit the message is received (and can finally, after the last bit, be retranslated into the word that was sent [if everythign worked correctly])

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140903105646.htm

Nice demonstration, but not as sensational as one would think from the headlines ... and especially not as direct as one would think.

Edited by Godot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The trouble is, even if this works, I think it would take a VERY long time to establish a reliable connection between two people.

From what I know about how the brain works, the signal from every person, even if they concentrated on the same thing, would look very different. So if two people wanted to do this with each other, they'd need to spend a lot of time on it, giving their brains ample time to interpret the signal into something they could 'read.'

seems like part of having such a device installed in your skull is learning an electronic language of sorts. that or use some kind of external signal processor that can interpret the data in real time. probibly a combination of both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I would call this telemetry not telepathy.

Calling someone on a cellphone isn't telepathy, even if you mount it directly to the brain, it's still a cellphone.

This technology does have a lot of potential uses, just don't start making it sound magical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is "just" transmitting a message from one brain to another using a means of physical communication- in this case, electronically. The only thing truly novel is that the message was sent and received directly from the brain, rather than through voice, text messaging or some other communications system.

It's just one small step on the way to our (likely) transhuman future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I genuinely never heard about this, please enlighten my scientific knowledge. :)

Transcranial stimulation is a mature technology, it can be done either by putting electrodes on the scalp to send DC current (used for some diseases, it can excite or inhibit parts of the brain, not very useful here) or pulses (not sure how much this is used, electroshock is this with high power, still used for certain diseases), or by inducing currents magnetically.

The magnetic one (TMS) sends AC current in a coil, and it induces currents in the brain (same principle as an induction cooker, or those cellphone charging mats) close to the coil.

Then, you also have the possibility to stick electrodes inside, for example on the retina, cochlea (in the ear, to restore hearing) or directly in the brain (deep brain stimulation is used to treat extreme cases of epilepsy, and brainstem stimulation is used to restore basic hearing).

I'm not sure what they used here, but I would guess TMS.

Recording signals from the brain can be done in many ways. Electrodes are regularly used to let paralyzed people control computers, and it looks they used that here. When you think of moving a part of your body, the motor cortex activates. Different parts of your body are controlled by different parts of your brain (a band along the central sulcus), and with a few electrodes you can distinguish between moving your left foot and moving your right arm. The signal is quite noisy, and not very fast, but it's cheap and not very invasive.

Then you have the fancier stuff, fMRI (MRI that looks at the bloodflow in the brain in real time) and MEG (measures the magnetic field generated by the brain, and reconstructs a map of currents, very large and expensive machine, but brilliant). These machines have much better resolution, and can see deeper in the brain. It is for example possible to reconstruct images you see (with a rather poor resolution) by measuring activity in your visual cortex with a fMRI.

And once again, if you can get electrodes directly inside the brain, you can get much better resolution. Once again, very serious cases of epilepsy is a condition that require it. To treat epilepsy surgically or by DBS (deep brain stimulation), you need to know what parts are affected, and most importantly what parts triggers the crises (it's usually a small part going berserk, the crisis then propagating). To do that accurately, doctors sometimes put a network of electrodes directly inside the skull and keep it for a few weeks. At that point, neuroscientists sometimes ask the patients to participate in diverse experiments, since they can record brain activity with an excellent resolution without putting the subject in a scary gigantic machine.

By combining fMRI or MEG and DBS or TMS, it should be possible to directly transmit the voice in your head into somebody's head. But that would be more expensive, and not much more useful than this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...