Jump to content

Extra Large/3.75 Meter and Tiny/0.625 Meter S.A.S Module(s)


Recommended Posts

I assume that Squad has already thought about this, because there are modules for both small and large sizes. If they keep up this trend, they should implement one for every size.

We need tiny and extra large S.A.S modules for our tiny and extra large craft.

If tiny S.A.S module(s) are implemented, people will be able to conceal S.A.S modules in wings, cavities, or use them in small rovers. If extra large S.A.S modules are implemented, people could stabilize lower stages of extra large rockets seemlessly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, on the matter I would gladly take 0.625 :

- long fuel tank

- high thrust engine

- solid booster

If only to increase design possibility, but I'm also hoping to see it used as the first ever engine available, with probes because it's better than starting manned.

However I think we shouldn't make 3.75 a normal size. In fact the lack of SAS capable of moving the mass of 3.75 rocket could be deliberate to mark the limit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, on the matter I would gladly take 0.625 :

- high thrust engine

We already have a high-thrust 0.625 m engine: it's called the 48-7S. Assuming a constant density, rockets powered by the 48-7S engine can be 11.6% taller relative to their diameter than rockets powered by the LV-T30 engine, 28% taller than rockets powered by the Mainsail, and 102.5% taller than rockets powered by the KS-25x4 engine cluster. What we're really lacking is a high-thrust 3.75 m engine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reaction wheels are already almost always the best choise for craft control.

Expect for airplanes and very heavy ships.

The bigger it get, the less efficient it become. At some point I have seen document saying it would be more weight/energy-efficient to pump the propellant around.

What we're really lacking is a high-thrust 3.75 m engine.

They could just buff up the KS-25x4 to IMO "what it should be" (I'm always found the engine slightly underpowered for the weight it's meant to carry), but the KR-2L is quite "OP" too, I expected it to be a midstage engine but it can actually replace the KS-25 with its thrust.

You made your point for the 48-7S though, I had forgot how light it was to build at this size.

What's missing is maybe an high-Isp 0.625 engines, not the LV-1 but something better. Though it would require a bad TWR to avoid stack of it replacing the LV909.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They could just buff up the KS-25x4 to IMO "what it should be" (I'm always found the engine slightly underpowered for the weight it's meant to carry), but the KR-2L is quite "OP" too, I expected it to be a midstage engine but it can actually replace the KS-25 with its thrust.

The KS-25x4 is actually more powerful than "it should be". The real SLS first stage won't be able to lift itself, while the KS-25x4 can easily lift a stack of three S3-14400 fuel tanks. It's a similar design as the space shuttle: boosters do the heavy lifting, while the first stage is really a second stage with a lot of extra fuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah then the KR-2L really was that overpowered... Especially with its vac Isp.

What bother me is that unless you don't need a KR-2L as a second stage, the KS-25x4 don't stay a first/second stage for long so I've rarely used the two together. Guess it fit what I wanted about not making 3.75 a "normal" size but it encourage to use 2.5 as a middle-stage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...