Jump to content

Solar System Formation


Nuke

Recommended Posts

indeed this is an incredibly finely detailed image, especially from a target 450 ly away...modern telescopy blows my expectations away sometimes. it's incredible to be able to image such a process in the raw "as it happens" in such detail rather than as models and simulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is pretty awesome.

There are two well defined gaps that should correspond to 2 inner planets,

Then I see 2 circles where it gets dimmer, then two more well defined gaps -> but given the proximity of these two gaps, I suspect they will either merge, or their interaction will send one/both into a different orbit in the not too distant future (in relative terms)

Then there are another 2 gaps, again pretty close (so I dont think the resulting protoplanets would be instable orbits), and then the edge of the disk.

I wonder about the size of the star and the size of the visible disc, is it shaping up to be a red dwarf? are those inner protoplanets shaping up to be terrestrials, or gas giants? Is th disc 10 AU across? 100? etc

Edited by KerikBalm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The inner two rings in that picture correspond to about the distance Jupiter and Saturn are from the Sun. So it seems this is a budding solar system much like ours.

From current models of planetary formation, gas giants form about 1-10 million years after initial collapse, before the gas gets dispersed by the newborn star, and terrestrial planets take much longer, about 100 million years. This system looks like it's in the first few million years after birth, when gas giants are just forming and clearing out their orbits but there is still gas in the disk.

edit: The article says the disk is less than a million years old.

Edited by metaphor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The inner two rings in that picture correspond to about the distance Jupiter and Saturn are from the Sun. So it seems this is a budding solar system much like ours.

Remember that the current idea is that some planets migrated after the formation of the solar system, so overlaying them can be a bit dangerous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that the current idea is that some planets migrated after the formation of the solar system, so overlaying them can be a bit dangerous.

That's true. According to the Grand Tack model, Jupiter migrated inwards from about 3-4 AU to about 1.5-2 AU, until Saturn pulled it back out to about 5 AU with Saturn at about 7 AU (originally around 5 AU). This all happened in the first 500,000 years after the solar system formed though. The article doesn't specify exactly how old the disk is, so it might be before or after an equivalent migration (although it looks like before, so maybe less than 100,000 years after formation).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...