Tex Posted January 24, 2015 Share Posted January 24, 2015 Maybe I'm not reading this right, but that sounds a lot like the second opinion in the poll, no?I address that in the first sentence of my second little mini-paragraph. Actually, you quoted that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wjolcz Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 (edited) KSP was a pretty content rich game in so called "alpha". We had docking, planets, conics and other stuff back then. Tbh the real beta release for me was 0.16 with its kerbals, EVA parts resizing and all that. I dont care what the updates are named and numbered. I think its a good time to go from Beta to full release. Its just that SQUAD didnt name it Beta earlier, and nobody would care about it being so short.Sorry for this post for being a mess full of words. Its just how my mind works almost all the time. Hope you get what Im talking aboutCompared to Minecraft in its Alpha KSP was more advanced. It just was missing few essential things, that havent been added in the correct order. The development is slightly chaotic but the game is great Edited January 25, 2015 by Veeltch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CavemanNinja Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 The Mk3 spaceplane parts and a coming soon aerodynamics overhaul makes this game complete to me. There ain't no arguing with someone who doesn't care about the result of the argument. Besides, what do silly titles and connotations like "beta" and "release" matter anyway?On a different (and less frivolous) note, congrats to Squad for taking their time in and doing it right, Love you guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiterafter Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Just a few days ago I saw a guy whining that the game has been in development for 4 years, so yeah, I feel that to some extent it has been rushed. People who are in favor of taking it slow tend to voice their opinions through realism complaints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metl Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Four years is quite a long time for a game to be in development, especially today. I'm confident 1.0 will be ready. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoSlash27 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 The Mk3 spaceplane parts and a coming soon aerodynamics overhaul makes this game complete to me. There ain't no arguing with someone who doesn't care about the result of the argument. Besides, what do silly titles and connotations like "beta" and "release" matter anyway?On a different (and less frivolous) note, congrats to Squad for taking their time in and doing it right, Love you guys!That's the part that's got me stumped. "Beta" vs "release" doesn't mean anything to us. We play the game regardless of what name or number they slap on it. Nothing changes for us, so what's the uproar?Best,-Slashy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 That's the part that's got me stumped. "Beta" vs "release" doesn't mean anything to us. We play the game regardless of what name or number they slap on it. Nothing changes for us, so what's the uproar?Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klgraham1013 Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 That's the part that's got me stumped. "Beta" vs "release" doesn't mean anything to us. We play the game regardless of what name or number they slap on it. Nothing changes for us, so what's the uproar?Best,-SlashyBecause the perception changes to the outside audience; to penitential buyers and reviewers. Some may say reviews don't matter, but perception does. If KSP becomes known as an interesting game, hampered by bugs and a poorly built career mode, that can only hurt the games future. As well as any chance at a sequel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 ... to penitential buyers and reviewers. Try potential. I don't think anyone feels the need for penitence after buying this game, unless they are intentionally slaughtering Kerbals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiterafter Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Why would KSP have a sequel?Games with the style of development like KSP (minecraft) tend to be in continuous improvement and development, and a sequel would be too similar to KSP to market as new and improved Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanamonde Posted January 25, 2015 Share Posted January 25, 2015 Despite the thread title, this is essentially a repeat of the main poll thread. Please continue the discussion there rather than open new threads on the same subject. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts