Jump to content

The Number War: Count to 100 or -100


RainDreamer

Recommended Posts

Totes legit win you got there guys, congratulations. Also, did you know there's "gullible" written on the forum background in a slightly different color? If you lean back from your monitor, you will see it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

0 :):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):):🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙉🙊🙈🙈🙉🙉🙊🙊🙊🙊🙉🙈🙈🙉🙈🙊🙉🙈🙊🙉🙈🙊🙊🙊🙈

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Waait a sec peeps. What the heck happened when I was sleeping?

The nearest, seemingly valid posts are way back here:

66 cantu
YES!

Finally!

67!

Posted at 0:53 for me, valid, but overridden
65 what
Posted at 0:53 for me too, so it overriden the above number
64...
<- Apparently last correct number, but there was some edits? Don't edit people, it is not something I want to wake up to to check.

And then, Fel pulled a big move:

It's 67, I added 1 before Fel subtracted 2.
*also, zekes, don't edit your posts... even if you really want to :(... cause it makes a bit of a mess :( *

- - - Updated - - -

No, the count is 96

And people just took it from there to 100.

Now people, I have a few reminders for you about the rules.

1. If you see an error, you quote the last correct post before moving on as per error reporting procedure of rule 6:

In the case of the current number being incorrect due to intentional or unintentional misinformation/misinterpretation, a player must notify others of the error, and will have to find the last correct number and quote that post (for easier accuracy checking) and the game continues as normal from the last correct number.

Failure to do this, or if the post you are quoting is incorrect, makes your revert invalid.

2. While rule 6 does states that:

The responsibility of finding errors falls on to players. If no one report the error following the procedure above, before the number reach 100 or -100, the win will still be awarded, the positive team if 100, negative team if -100.

It also says:

Common sense apply here though. If someone intentionally jack up a ton of numbers at once and reach a winning number in just a few posts, that is way too obvious and won't count as a win. This rules apply for more subtle errors in numbers.

Fell jacked the number from 64 to 96 (+32) in one post. I would not call that error subtle enough to account for a win, even if the rule does allow errors to win. If you have like, a few numbers skipped per few posts and folks doesn't care or does not notice, it is ok to win, and is playing within the vagueness of the rules. But jacking up numbers in such a big move is a blatant disregard for the rules, and allowing it to win would be the same.

So for this case, I am going to use my GM power to veto the win and reset the number to 64. The round is not over yet, people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey, I honestly didn't expect them to follow me... and then they started posting victory videos so I HAD to restart the count XD

63 (-1)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...