RoboRay

Members
  • Content Count

    1,633
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1,353 Excellent

About RoboRay

  • Rank
    Rocket Surgeon

Recent Profile Visitors

2,304 profile views
  1. Tweakscale is generally regarded as being incompatible with RO. It breaks stuff. I was under the impression that RO actively disables Tweakscale if you try to use it, but I could be mistaken.
  2. I'm not aware of any Procedural Parts branches explicitly stating that they support KSP 1.7, but these are just textures so they should be fine in any version of KSP that you can get Procedural Parts working with.
  3. It's already in your hands. Your pull requests will be much appreciated.
  4. Stock parts were deliberately gimped by Squad, because parts with realistic masses and performance characteristics would make the toy-sized stock solar system so trivially easy that the game wouldn't be fun. Any craft built using stock parts (or mod parts balanced with stock parts) will have the same unrealistically poor performance. In a realistic, full-sized solar system like RSS, you can either use the Realism Overhaul mod to give the parts accurate real-world masses and performance, or use something like the SMURFF mod to rebalance the stock parts to have more realistic characteristics.
  5. Taerobee has some stuff that you will use early in the career (like V-2 rocket and X-1 plane parts). Vostok Continued has early manned Soviet craft. SSTU has lots of versatile tanks and and engines plus parts for mid-game to late-game manned American craft.
  6. But you're only implementing the capsule itself. Trying to include the service module features into the capsule would imbalance the DLC Gemini capsule compared to the mod Gemini capsules. It would also be unrealistic, since the Gemini capsule doesn't have sufficient volume to make room for all that equipment and storage containers. Your best bet is to simply implement the capsule config for what the capsule actually provided (using the FASA Gemini as a reference), and assume that the service module features will be provided by an attached service module.
  7. I haven't tested it yet, but this fills a big hole in the "everything is procedural" approach to craft design. Thank you! I'm really interested in pursing non-US/non-Soviet entries in the space race, and this will make it a lot easier to not be limited by the design impacts of using historical US or Soviet engines.
  8. I would look at the RO configs for FASA Gemini and work with those numbers. They should be pretty solid.
  9. Definitely need to keep dV in KER... The KER UI offers a much better presentation, whether you prefer a comprehensive or a minimalist approach.
  10. Definitely concur on the need for a new thread. Even without the inability to edit the OP, the changes in RP1 are so significant that keeping the info for RP0 in the same thread as RP1 is just going to confuse and mislead the unicorns who actually try to read previous posts and figure things out for themselves instead of just asking questions first.
  11. The PEG algorithms are the ones actually developed by NASA for guiding the space shuttle ascent, so it's absolutely tuned for RSS and not stock KSP. I really doubt it would be useful on launches from Kerbin.
  12. Tweakscale causes most negative mass issues.
  13. If you have the same floating tiles thing that most people have, it only seems to happen on reentry from suborbital flights. If you quicksave then quickload at apogee, it shouldn't happen.