Sirrobert

Concidering most people reguarly test rockets by launching them, revert, make change, launch, repeat. That'd get boring fast

With glass?

Mission accomplished

I'd really requiest they give me a little more exciting life if they'd hook me up to the Matrix

That's quite an interesting list.

When you escape Kerbin SOI, you still have Kerbin's orbit around the sun, plusminus the velocity you used to escape. So you are still rhougly equatorial

That would explain the method by which orphaned massless parts regain mass (as was discribed in an earlier post)

Doesn't sound like much until you realize a phone is milimeters. So it's thousands of percentages thicker

An easier sollution would probably making a probe body massless. I believe there's only a single line in the part file that dictates that

Yea, the more I think about it the more I'd agree with a standpoint of secret observation. We're bad enough against members of our own species that don't fit with the 'norm' I still hold that they'd have better ways of researching us than tagging though

No, that's starter evil. A far more advanced version would be 'don't worry, I practiced with all those crashed landers. I'm sure it'll be fine now'

Huh... No I had not realized that. Though humanity mostly tags animals to study them. There are far easier ways to study humans. Most scientists would jump at the oppertunity to help aliens study us. That does only reduce it from 'outright insane' to 'there's an easier way' though. Interesting

I pointed you to wikipedia. The very fact that you hadn't found that yourself says more than I possibly could

Yea, if there's anyone that can teach you how to wipe out humanity, it's humanity But they already are immune to most/any diseases that would affect us. Human viri (is that the plural? virussus?) can't even affect closely related species, let alone species that evolved on a different planet

Guys, we are discussing against what apears to be the equivilant of an anti-vaccination nut. He doesn't read anything, he only picks quotes that fit his own view and ignores the rest Please give up, spare your blood pressure

Those 'alien abductions' are usually a result of people getting sleep paralasys, and not knowing what it is. So are we going to asume the flying saucer beams you up and probes you, than puts you back? Or a more realistic version where FTL capable beings actually do sensable things? I'd love actual contact with aliens, though I'd rather have them contact actual scientists

That glass is WAY thicker

Do you even know what sperm morphology MEANS? Cause that is not a factor in children

Yea, we were all so much more social back in the day Here you go The GIGANTIC block of links at the bottom are links to scientific research that is used to support the writing of that wiki page. Knock yourself out

There will never be a universal cancer medicine/vaccine, or any other kind of treatment, because 'cancer' is not a disease, but an umbrella term of many different diseases. Even 2 people who have the same kind of cancer (colon, prostate, lung, that kinda stuf) each have a different disease, because off the way cancer forms (through mutations). Each individual case has a different combination of mutations, which makes it a unique case that requires specialized care

For biological imortality, a better term would probably be 'does not grow old'

We know it's not harmfull BECAUSE of those statistics and research. It's not 'o it's not safe/safe let's do some research' it's 'we don't know if this is dangerous, let's research that'. It is indeed cheaper to just release your stuf and see what happends. That's what used to happen. Not anymore. The world has changed. You can't base your arguments in science on stuf that happened 50 years ago. We are STILL discovering new ways stuf can damage us, or stuf around us. Epigenetics for example studies how things can modify the way our body reads DNA, without actually changing the DNA. This is a relatively new field. 50 years ago people thought that wasn't even possible. You can't blame science for for fact that goverments are slow to react. EVERYWHERE AROUND YOU. Statistical annalasis of the entire world has shown no increase in health risks linked to cell phones. Or to put it in scientific terms: The point of the research was to show that sperm count would go down in the presence of cell phones. The study only tests that SPECIFIC question. That's how science works, 1 small question at a time. So for the study, there needs to be a control group in the exact same cages, given the exact same food, breathing the exact same air, ect ect ect. Just without cell phones. There is also no such thing as a study proving that something is safe. You can only prove that there is no health risk. And you have to do a study for every single possible health risk. If all plausable ways have been tested, something is deemed safe (if those ways aren't dangerous)

This here is the SCIENCE forum. If you want to convince people here, you do it with science. There are plenty of people here that have already used science to explain why cell phones don't produce any kind of radiation that can cause harm, and why it's magnetic field doesn't effect the body. All you have done so far is claimed they are not safe, without ANY sources backing you up. If you want to convince people here, provide some research claiming it. Until you do, your claims will be taken as seriously as all other conspiracy theories (as in: not)

Just try not to talk about how you crashed your lander. Or how your ship got eaten by the Kraken

Ooo, fancy. As for the OP: What's wrong with the stability enhancers? Sure they don't look fancy, but I'd hardly call them pathetic