Boomerang

Thanks so much, I'll test it out! Edit - Works perfectly for me now!

I'm really loving the immersion-factor of this! I've noticed briefly though that at least the Inline Command Pod from Near Future Spacecraft doesn't function. And the config does contain:

I enjoy the 'had life have them happen to them while xyz...' category. Have about half a B.S. in both biology and environmental studies.

Yeah, the climax was pretty wanky. The actual one would have been more suspenseful and believable anyway. Overall though, not bad.

I run between 40-50 mods, though most of them are relatively minor/limited in scope. And most of those I tweak a bit myself to get what I want out of the game. And that's running the native instillation for OSX. No 64 bit cracks or anything and no memory crashes. That's in my main save, anyway. I've got another experimental save that just features a few mods that I consider nearly-essential while I test out new parts and such. And I do have a vanilla install, if for nothing more than a clean save that I can copy original data from when I've mucked things up in my other saves.

Christopher Walken, is that, you?

I said 60% as a rough estimate. If it were my product, I wouldn't consider it any where near a state in which I would be comfortable or proud to have it for sale, at full price, on the shelves. We're still having significant aspects of gameplay added (the upcoming addition of required satellite relays, for one), and probably more importantly, the bugs haven't been ironed out. I'm not talking about minor things, but bugs in the category of, 'if I hadn't paid a low price with the understanding that this is in early-release, then this would be unacceptable'. Random crashes, random collisions or disassembles flinging parts away at solar escape velocities, or collisions making the rendering of Kerbin disappear and locking the game up. Things of that nature. To say nothing of continuing balancing passes. I don't mean to say the game is bad in its current state. But if it was my brain-child, I certainly wouldn't put it out there and expect people to pay $35-50+ for it.

By all means, go for it. Have a blast.

Flippin' hell... I don't know whether I hope this is trolling or sincere anymore.

Built in Intel Iris. Not anything mind-blowing, but it does the job well enough for KSP.

What exactly makes the life support wedges for this mod enter into the 'Life Support' category that it creates? I noticed the 'KPBS Settings' cfg that seems to have something to do with the filtering, but looking at the part configs, I can't see what places the wedges into the LS category vs. the greenhouse itself staying with Utilities. It'd be nice to have the greenhouse and my other LS containers all fall into that tab.

Can we just have a ban on these "Is XYZ cheating?" threads now?

And we've got an SCP for the 3000 series...

Thanks for the response!

Been slow in here, but I'd like to reiterate my previous request. If there's a model for the HCV that doesn't feature the LES engines at all, I'd love to get a hold of it. The way I used to disable the engine module but leave the animation module now induces a bug with the part. So if I don't want the LES, I've got to delete all relevant bits of the cfg and be left with a pod that always has the engine flaps deployed.

There wasn't a whole lot of 'polish' put on the game between the very brief 'beta' and the 'release'. It's what we've got to work with *shrugs* I don't think a whole lot of people who've been following the game for a while would consider 1.0.x a standard quality release.

A more streamlined means of cherry picking which revamps are applied would be an awesome update for the future. For now I'm sat here scratching my head as to why I have about an 80% success rate when I try to block revamps with the // in front of the @PART[xyz] within the Parts cfgs. Edit: As an example, I've blocked all of the modified stock solar panels in the 'Eletrical.cfg' (sic) except for the Gigantor XL (@PART[largeSolarPanel]), yet when I load the game, absolutely all of the solar panels are showing their native graphics. And any edits at all to Eletrical.cfg seem to disable the revamped versions of the two stock spotlights.

+7 (-)

Can't wait for TAC-LS support!

And this is why I delete the part from my saves.

The OP mentions an alternate config to remove the LES from the Taurus capsule, but I'm not seeing it anywhere in the unzipped folder. I don't mind manually removing the relevant bits of the cfg (it's what I've always done) but if this alt config removes the visual aspects of the LES from the capsule, I'd very much like to know where it's hiding.

I've been pulling these textures out of old saves for ages now, nice to see them as a separate release and still getting love!

Can we have a poll about how little we care about what people consider wrong or cheating or what have you in an open, single player game?

Count me among those who don't eat too much while gaming. Usually it's just water, coffee, or beer, depending on the time of day. If I have to something, then a homemade burrito or something that's one-handed.

Pre-.90, there was a mod called [thread=92511]PartArranger[/thread] that allowed one to shift around parts within the editor parts lists. So that, for example, you could order your fuel tanks so that the 3m LFO tanks were arranged large to small, then the 2m tanks, 1m, etc, then the aircraft tanks, then xenon. Changes were saved to a text file within the mod's GameData folder and were reloaded in the user-defined order each time an editor was opened. The features that PartArranger were based upon were eliminated with the editor-revamp that occurred with .90. The only real game in town for organizing parts now seems to be Filter Extensions, which, while helpful and with a rather dedicated support staff, just doesn't provide the same level of finesse that PartArranger did and it's no where near as ergonomic. So, my request is for something akin to PartArranger, that would allow us to re-order the tabs of the parts list to our liking, without having to resort to something silly like manually renaming the titles of parts in the cfg. I don't know if this could be accomplished by the introduction of a new editor parameter and some clever use of MM or anything of the sort - if I knew more, I'd be taking a stab at it myself. But the biggest drag on my enjoyment of the game right now is how disordered my parts are and if someone could give us a meaningful way of organizing them, I'd be very grateful.