Feasibility of Practical Reusability with Solid Rockets

[Silavite]

The STS proved that SRMs can be reused, but the refurbishment required was immense. A big part of this was likely due to the fact that the motors were dropped in seawater, but I find myself wondering if a different landing system would have made practical reusability (in the vein of the Falcon 9 first stage) possible. Even assuming that SRMs are able to magically soft land near the launch site, the refueling process involves recasting and installing multiple segments of solid rocket fuel. Even handwaving the issue of landing (say that a winged flyback system with horizontal landing is used) and inspection, the refueling process sounds insurmountably labor intensive.

Could practical reusability (on the level of the Falcon 9 first stage, which pushes costs down significantly but isn't a paradigm changer) or rapid reusability (on the level of Starship's aspirations with almost no inspection) be achieved with solids? If so, how?

[kerbiloid]

Afair, the Shuttle SRB were disassembled into a heap of metal sheets, and reassembled from randomly taken intact sheets from that.

So, maybe a hybrid one could be, with one component solid and another one liquid.

[TheSaint]

On the whole, I think that the Shuttle SRB reusability was a feature designed to impress senators, not accountants.