Jump to content

Lexx Thai

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    98

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Lexx Thai

  1. Lexx Thai
    Alnair needs remake of Khrunichev Center logo
  2. Lexx Thai
    I updated my previous post with another picture. I think, were several variants of LK construction. And the second picture I saw at one site with Landing Radar Unit photo.
  3. Lexx Thai
    No. -> And not so big. Really, KSP have lack of really small things, especially ullage engines and separation engines. No, that is not landing radar. At this picture landing radar shown as #17. But on this picture, landing radar placed at "front" side of LK, and marked #1
  4. Lexx Thai
    Oh, I missed station name. MIR core module of course, not ISS, in Space Museum in Moscow. But ISS mockup would be very interesting.
  5. Lexx Thai
    Ha! The last two images of the Interior of "the world" looks authentically. I was inside the station mockup in the Space Museum and it looks exactly, but interior at pictures and photos looks bigger than real. If I can find the pictures from there, then I'll post them. Added later:I think, can't do that. Damned photogarbage:mad:
  6. Lexx Thai
    Beale, all color variations is awesome! Put them all in alternative textures pack or make the Firespitter texture switcher config.
  7. Lexx Thai
    That's image taken from article about "Vilyuy". It's just project by space-fan (I think so) like we all on this forum:D. One of the feature of that project is asparagus staging (in original manner):
  8. Lexx Thai
    N-11 - the N-1 without first stage (medium lifter, like Soyuz, if I remember it right) N-111 - cryogenic upper (3rd) stage for N-1 and N-11. One picture from Internet, just for fun:
  9. Lexx Thai
    You're not alone. N1 is very... strange machine. I think, it had not future even with success of lunar program. In some construction features it was a step back even with R7 family (too many engines on first stage... for 75tons payload is simplest example).
  10. Lexx Thai
    It may be funny, but the closest (IMHO) the word is similar in pronunciation to "Angara" is the Hangar. Differences in the absence of the "H" clear "R" and long "A", as in "car".
  11. Lexx Thai
    As someone posted before (long time ago), PPTS even bigger than VA diameter. So, diameter of the "Tantares-style" capsule is closer to 2m.
  12. Lexx Thai
    Ah, so that's how it works! Thanks alot. But what about TLTWR?
  13. Lexx Thai
    Beale, can you make animation tutorial?
  14. Lexx Thai
    It's alive! ALIVE! Thanks, Raptor. Variant A is better, but in that case I can't vary ISP by TechLevel. In variant B it's possible, but ISP values for engine replaced by values from RealSettings.cfg:confused: (Nathan, what are you overcoded there? Latest sources is difficult as hell! )
  15. Lexx Thai
    Nathan, how RealSettings.cfg TechLevel parameters affects on engines? For example, part of my engine config (0.64x scaled RD-111): @PART[liquidEngineconstelacion]:FOR[RealFuels_StockEngines] //AIES Constellation-C6 { @mass = 0.390 @cost = 325 @maxTemp = 1740 @MODULE[ModuleEngines] { @maxThrust = 666.5 @heatProduction = 155 @atmosphereCurve { @key,0 = 0 317 @key,1 = 1 275 } !PROPELLANT[LiquidFuel] {} !PROPELLANT[Oxidizer] {} !PROPELLANT[MonoPropellant] {} PROPELLANT { name = Kerosene ratio = 27.39 DrawGauge = True } PROPELLANT { name = LqdOxygen ratio = 72.61 } } MODULE { name = ModuleEngineConfigs type = ModuleEngines techLevel = 2 origTechLevel = 2 engineType = L+ origMass = 0.390 configuration = Kerosene+LqdOxygen modded = false ...and so on And slightly changed RealSettings (I think what TLISP defines MINIMAL edge values for engines): TLISP2 { key = 0 357 key = 1 304 } TLTWR2 = 57.3 TLTECH2 = generalRocketry TLTHROTTLE2 = 0.8 But ingame I saw correct max thrust value (666.5), but strange ISP ranges (304 - 357). What's happen?
  16. Lexx Thai
    I have a question about RealSettings.cfg: Nathan, can you explain me about MFS_TECHLEVEL structure fields (TLISP, TLTWR and TLTHROTTLE)?
  17. Lexx Thai
    I think both options would be wonderful.
  18. Lexx Thai
    RCSBA is incompatible with ModuleRCSFX. It seems to the KSP ModuleRCS and ModuleRCSFX classes do not look the same.
  19. Lexx Thai
    It's not a problem. In most cases we already have several "copies" of some pods. It's not bigger docking port, it's just standard small port with conic adapter. HA! I think, if you make the 1m (that size better for your mod) port, Niemand303 or someone else build proper craft (ISS-like station already posted). WANT IT! NOW! If you split OM into two seperate models - cylinder and cone, I will love you even bigger.
  20. Lexx Thai
    No! I think, it now bigger than needed! Or not bigger than needed... Added later: Hm, Beale, how do you think about bigger (something about 0.8m - 1m) docking port for TANTARES pack? Can you make it?
  21. Lexx Thai
    Beale, can you make an alternative version of FUJI (may be with modular OM) with 1.25m docking port placeholders?
  22. Lexx Thai
    Is it bug in KOSMOS, not in TweakScale?
  23. Lexx Thai
    Awesome! (this message has been appended to post:))
  24. Lexx Thai
    Beale, can you make the "fairing" adapter for bottom side of Fuji to mount it on "standard" cylindrical service module. By the way, the "real-life" Fuji maximal diameter looks like same on TKS or future PPTS (PTK NP).
  25. Lexx Thai
    Original KOSMOS part config: http://pastebin.com/rJA1DKq7 I think, the KOSMOS tanks config file from RF don't needed for you. Except RealSettings.cfg: http://pastebin.com/PZbEqzdf And my patch for that part: http://pastebin.com/sr8Mf1Tr Is it correct?
×
×
  • Create New...