-
Posts
569 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Bug Reports
Posts posted by billbobjebkirk
-
-
Would there be any major adverse effects to uninstalling the plugins for this mod? It's been nice but I feel like at this point in my save it may have become too much of a driver of lag
-
9 hours ago, Zorg said:
Some of the names and tags werent correct in the initial commit. Voyager or "Nomad" should bring up everything related now.
Nomad? This thing's not gonna come back and take over the Enterprise, is it?
-
On 10/24/2022 at 9:26 AM, CobaltWolf said:
Unfortunately there's no source material to be found past what's on Astronautix.
There is some more stuff in The Lunar Exploration Scrapbook by Robert Godwin, I wouldn't know where to go for something more comprehensive and technical short of asking the author about his sources...
-
4 hours ago, Pudgemountain said:
Not KSP and not what I intended but I don't know, these might make interesting Kitbashes with BDB parts if done by someone with enough skill and paitence
[We've all seen this image by now so -snip-]
I like the upper middle-right with the Saturn V being serviced by an old school water tower...
-
Excellent update! Very much worth the wait for all that beauty!
-
2 hours ago, SpaceFace545 said:
Invader made the new one. He made the apollo side but I think he forgot to make the Soyuz side. It’s in BDB
No, it's posted right here:
On 2/9/2022 at 12:40 AM, Invaderchaos said: -
12 hours ago, soyuz 33 said:
Ohhh! After This Do we get the Mir-2 Parts?
I suspect we're only seeing this because the parts have already been modeled, I'd be more hopeful of seeing the revamped APAS-75
-
28 minutes ago, CDSlice said:
These are some beautiful crafts and pictures! I do have a question though. Why is the fly back booster manned? It doesn't seem to have any upsides since the crew wouldn't be going to orbit while keeping the downsides of needing crew to launch a cargo mission along with the risk of having your crew die if something goes wrong. Did NASA not think they could have autonomous landing technology ready at that point in time?
I can't speak with any certainty, but I don't believe autopilot technology had advanced enough to allow for autonomous landings, and even with such capabilities, the Astronaut corp put immense pressure on NASA not to include it, as they did not want NASA's flagship spacecraft not to need pilots.
-
17 hours ago, DaveyJ576 said:
1001... A BDB Odyssey!
Anyway, if NASA had actually built and flown the Big Gemini, it seems to me they would have picked a more dignified name for it other than "Big Gemini". What should it have been called?
@CobaltWolf, @Zorg BTW this is my 2nd test flight, and I can confirm that the 2.5m decoupler works, but it seems to have zero push force in it. The umbilical flaps come open and it seems as if I can see a sliver of light between the heatshield and the decoupler, but it doesn't go anywhere. If I tap the RCS the movement of the spacecraft will then throw off the retro section so I know it has detached.
For my Big Gemini save I thought it would be funny if NASA decided to call it the "Orion" capsule...
-
-
1 minute ago, Beccab said:
They are in the BDB apollo saturn branch
Does that include the Soyuz-style base or just the one for the ASTP docking module?
-
-
When I try to use the Venera lander probe, as I enter into Eve's atmosphere the heat shield survives but the probe inside is destroyed. How do I prevent this?
-
8 hours ago, CobaltWolf said:
We're adding one based on the Apollo tower, it's in one of the pics I posted.
Doy! I saw that picture and was so caught up with the S-IVB adapter that I totally missed the LES tower! Glad to see it's making it in!
-
On 2/13/2022 at 12:50 PM, Beccab said:
The Integrated Program Plan (1969)
Manned martian landing, part twoFriggin BadS!!!!
I'd love to see your take on a full IPP moonbase mission if you're up to it, though obviously not until after a well-deserved break!6 hours ago, CobaltWolf said:Some more update images on the Big G. It's going to have it's own upgraded parachutes and nose, since that was a complaint a lot of people shared about the current half-implemented Big G.
Could you also add a proper launch escape tower for it as well? I believe that was part of the plans for Big BasicallyCleanSheetInGemini'sClothing
-
8 hours ago, Beccab said:
The Integrated Program Plan (1969)
Manned martian landing, part one
The IPP, and in particular Grenning's Maximum Program which this recreation follows, was a grandiose plan laid out by NASA as a follow up to Apollo spanning over 14 years; it includes, but isn't limited to, earth-to-orbit shuttles, nuclear shuttles, space bases with a crew of 50 people, permanent lunar outposts, 41 INT-21 launches and finally with humanity setting foot on mars as early as 1982 on which this post focuses on.-snip-
I wish I could super-like this, it's so friggin awesome to see the IPP architecture in its full glory
(RDM, you should have taken notes!)
-
Ooooh, those VA and H-II parts are very pretty! I love this mod and I've been using it a lot in my latest save, one question, would you be able to add the white color for the Almaz parts back in? It seems to have vanished in the 1.12 update for Tantares.
-
4 hours ago, Beale said:
Most of the exotic colours got moved over to intercolour, by the lovely @Zarbon44
I see, makes sense, although I have Intercolour installed as well and I'm not seeing those colors either. I guess I'll have to take it up with Zarbon?
-
Finally updating my save to 1.12, what happened to the white and yellow color options for the Almaz and Progress parts?
-
10 hours ago, Beccab said:
I believe in Season 2 they were just trying too hard not to be another Apollo program alternate history and budgetary restrictions made them to use the Shuttle for as much stock footage as possible. I loved season 1 though
I think they just used the TTL shuttle design as an iconic thing that viewers would recognize, rather than because it made sense. Maybe some concept artist was showing off pictures of the DC-3 anf some non-technical person said "but that doesn't look like the shuttle!"
-
The problem is that none of the space stuff in Season 2 makes any sense whatsoever. They should have just gone with IPP.
-
2 hours ago, pTrevTrevs said:
Apollo 9: Out On a Limb
-snip-
So I can't believe I never noticed this before, but apparently LM-3 Spider did not actually have the RCS plume deflectors installed. As a matter of fact none of the LMs before LM-5 Eagle featured them. I have no idea why, but maybe someone more knowledgeable than I can explain more.
Anyway, here's the rest of the gallery:
Man, Apollo 9 was quite possibly the most beautiful apollo mission in terms of photos...
-
31 minutes ago, GoldForest said:
Showing off Apollo Block V but attaching a Block IV module to the top of it. That is the definition of KSP imo.
The Block V did fly with a mission module for Freedom expeditions, unless I'm missing something and it had a noticeably different MM?
-
4 hours ago, ra4nd0m said:
Thanks for an answer! But I have another question!) For docking between Freedom modules APAS is used correct? So why are they continue to use Apollo docking system between mission module and capsule?
They actually use CADS, an international docking system developed between NASA, ESA, and NASDA in the timeline for docking between Freedom Modules and Apollo. The old Apollo Probe-and-Drogue is still used on the actual capsule because it would require so many changes to alter the docking system (Especially since CADS has a wider diameter) that you'd basically have to redesign the entire capsule.
Free KSP2 Giveaway!
in Announcements
Posted
I'm exited for the changes to planets and UX that should make deep space exploration less painful and more interesting!