PB666

-96 (-)

It finds you first at c. I launch mud pies at craft trying to land on the runway.

Allcaps is cheating, cheater

-93 (-)

It is a guess, there is no emperical data that supports it. It causes an inifinite number of unobserved parallel universes that it does not resolve and it gives no particularly good explanation on how they resolved.

Of course i am assuming you are referring multiple worlds interpretation. I understand you favorbit and i will not attempt to change your mind. Again you and i are not going to agree on this, so give up trying now. I consider it a big fanciful guess, one thats promoted by some big names, but none the less these names have been accussed of guessing. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/the-philosophy-of-guessing-has-harmed-physics-expert-says/

Mash Do fireflies create light pollution?

If you have enough fuel for meo you can drop sats in leo and then burn to meo do a partial circ with the fuel left and deploy sats. Problem solved.

Just pair or more sats, no problem.

Because he doesnt have any squid oil. Why not?

You're a fly. Whap! gotta watch out for the fly swatters. I wish i could warp space time and create a black hole with my mind.

It can if you allow quantum tunneling in rekativistic space-time there are some string theory interpretations that allow this. What is the shape of quantum space-time, if it can assume any shape then one shape could be infintiscimally small in two dimensions and infinite in a third, in which case such 'spooky action at a distance' could be allowed via channels that appear at great infrequency (quantum time is very small so infrequent at that scale could be frequent at our scale).. The suspicion is that quantum space-time flattens because of e = mc^2 contributions, but shape is probably plastic. I frankly don't know the answer, i prefer that more testing is done.

Before you asked. How much squid oil does it take to fuel a rocket squid?

The edge of the observable universe is a few milliom years after the big bang, if we coukd clear a oath through CMBR and start look a third million years earlier it would be rather different, right now we see to 13.8 billion years or so, looking ever so slightly earlier you would see a tale of a very exotic universe. The problem is that the exotic universe was so exotic it was unstable and consequently we have CMBR. light behaves rather uniformly in space, it turns around massive objects, it red shifts as one expects from a field,mcertainly it would behave the same up to the point electromagnitism and weak force merge at high energy densities.

One of the leading physicist studying space-time basically says that the parallel universe hypothesis is nothing more than a guess. Copenhagen enterpretation is the most conservative interpretation, that is why i favor it. In this way i dont need to trouble myself with the coexistence of an infinite number of parallel universes. The pilot wave hypothesis has some appeal.

I like the copenhagen interpretation.

But you are not addressing the Fermi paradox at all, you are only addressing the issue of whether at some time in the long existence of some world, life arose, most likely like Mars got snuffed, or in the case of Titan, prolly is in such a restricted environment would hardly be recognizable here on Earth. The Fermi paradox basically is a refutation of a common misconception (Marvin the martian, war of the worlds, Venus needs men) etc. Which some sort of sentient life is at every turn of the stone. This can be basically and wholeheartedly refuted. Yes, Earth is 1, true, but where are the Earth comparables orbiting Sun comparables.

But I cut it before it arrives, and send it silently back to the sender. I instantly vaporize and burn all carbon sinks on Earth, at the same I turn all media spokespeople into climate deniers.

-91 (-)

-91 (-), oops previous post was in error (no sign).

You simply want to be argumentative. The ediacran only lasted 40 million years, and there are no/few apparent extant representatives from ediacaran, mostly theses lineages went extinct. There are no exact dividing lines between various aspects of formalized sexual reproduction as to say it occurred 500 million years earlier. It certainly true that simpler forms of cambrian lifeforms existed in the ediocaran, but it is not certian that they existed 500 million years earlier or even 100 million years earlier, that is a reach. The evidence is based upon a red algae fossil that looks like a modern red algae. There is also the assumption that the the algae mated sexually. In any case if life first firmed 3.8 to 4.2 billion years ago and sexually reproducing life appears 1.0 to 1.2 million years ago and the cambrian is closer 0.540 then the greatest growth of complexity is closer to the cambrian that to bioneogenesis. The basic statement that the cambrian explosion occurred as a result of complex sexual reproduction is true, but is also factored into a warming Earth with the ediacaran and other things. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Thus here on Earth there was a three billion year hard period in the developemnet of sentiency. We don't know that other hard periods might exist as a common feature of evolution. With a sample of 1 the confidence range could be half a billion years to 100 billion years, and as such could greatly limit the emmergence of complexity under the best circumstances. There are other hard periods such as early star formation and the lack of metals for billions of years, because of these it is not plausible for sentient life to have existed in the early universe, and only credible within the last 5 billion years, so the basic notion that many/most sentients have existed and died out, the reason they do not contact us, is a fabrication. Life of our complexity is difficult to get going. Its the point.

Banned for being numerophobic.

Spamming, cheater

I support it.

-88 (-)