SuccessPastaTime

Wow, thank you so much for the fantastic mod, and the quick response! I'll give this a try.

Don't know if it's possible, but I was wondering what files/folders I might take out of the SSTU Gamedata folder if I just wanted the engines of SSTU in my game? I'm doing an RP-0 career, and not all the parts are configured yet, but most, if not all the engines are, so I'd like to save a little RAM, even though i use the 64-bit version of KSP. I feel like the more I add to my game, the more unstable it gets. Anyway, I really like this mod, great models, and the procedural parts of it are amazing. Thanks!

This is a fantastic program! Thank you for bringing it to the community. I have ran it according to your post, but I haven't checked to see how textures are going to be in-game. I will let you know when I get a chance to check! Edit: Okay, looks like only problem I've had is with Universal Storage and SXT. US had some pruned files, which I think the outer casing for it's compartments got their models and textures from, because in game, the only thing visible was the experiments/components normally inside the containers. SXT on the other hand had the expected problem, black textures. I think I can fix US easy, but SXT is gonna take a bit, because I didn't note the specific parts that are having the issue. Also, I tried unpruning in the program, but after looking at the folder of the parts I was unpruning, nothing seemed to happen. This program as really made my load times much more bearable though, I thank you for that!

Nope, but I'll just use Steam to re validate the files. Probably a good idea to do that in the first place though. Thank you.

Alright, thank you. Do you know of a way I can reverse the effect of the .bat file?

Hey, enjoying the mod, and the new setup that allows it not to overwrite the Squad parts, but I had a quick question. I've pruned the parts using the .bat file, and I decided to install SXT today as well. I'm having a problem with textures showing up as white and reddish on most of the SXT parts. Could this be because the pruning or am I doing something wrong? Thanks!

I second what NK is saying. Would love to see impressions of those engines. I was wanting to release an engine pack which simulates a variety of real engines, but I just have no modding skills. I'd like to focus on smaller engines, and less well known ones first, then move onto more common ones. Also, would want to go in a chronological order with it all. Maybe one day I'll be able to actually accomplish this, but for now, it's just an idea. I really dig the way this project is going though, and it's basically a must have for me. Keep up the great work!

I made a procedural probe core config. It's really easy, but mine might have some strange properties, as I literally just added a command module to the procedural battery config and saved it as another part. It get ends up having a huge battery capacity as you make it larger, and I'm not even sure about how the weight should scale as you tweak it.

You're awesome! Thanks for this update, engines seem to work well with fuel, I'll let you know if any thing pops up, but so far, it's great!

Thanks for the reply. Yeah, I was actually taking a look at how the configs are written. I already know a little about MM, so I was gonna see if I can take a crack at them, I'd love to offer a helping hand if you'd like. Also, take your time on getting them out, real life should come first and foremost.

Hate to interrupt development, but I'm having a little problem with the mod. It works great and like it should, but for someone reason, the parts it affects no longer have TweakScale support, non-affected parts still allow scaling though. I searched the thread, and I really didn't see anything mentioning this, so just wanted to check with anyone who might know of a solution to this? Edit 2: After going through the RF folder, I noticed a file called Tweakscale_remover.cfg, I assume that could be the reason for this first problem. Sorry for my stupidity if it is. I was also wondering how to get engines that aren't supported by the mod to work, like ones that still just use LF/OX and don't have a GUI element. I have the remodel of Aerojet Kerbodyne installed, and some of the newer parts don't have StockAlike support yet, but was wondering how I might be able to use them anyway. I know this is probably a more RF in general oriented question, but thought I'd ask it here since I'm using this mod rather then RF for RO. Edit: What I mean is, is there a way to also use non-configured engines using the stock resources while this is installed? When I put a non-configured engine, for example, the LV-900 from Aerojet Kerbodyne together with one of the service modules included, which also isn't configured for StockAlike, nothing shows up under delta-v in MechJeb. Sorry for the mouthful . Hope to hear back from you fine contributors to the community!

Thanks for reply. Did that, all is good.

Hey, I had a quick question. I installed some of the part revamps, not all of them, but a majority of them, and I didn't realize that this would have an effect on SXT, because it uses stock textures. I didn't back up at the time because I assume that going into Steam and rebuilding the cache will fix this. Is it correct to think this? I haven't changed any other stock parts, so it won't mess with any other mods I have installed, right? Thanks!

Truly can't wait for the probe cores and panel. Keep up the great work!

Yeah, my game is like this too. It seems it's much more sensitive. I've only been able to get a single rocket to orbit since I've installed .25 w/ FAR, but I haven't been playing a whole lot. Planes are also much more difficult to fly. I have played with FAR for a long time, so I'm used to its changes, so I assume something is different with this update. I bet I just need to adjust some settings, but I've never done it before, so I'm not sure what to even do.

I'd recommend building your own, or at least troubleshooting. If it's giving you a flashing cursor, which I assume is like a command line cursor, not a mouse cursor, it's probably not POSTing for some reason. Does the interior of your PC have LED lights, or does it beep as it starts up? If you just wanna get something new, as your computer is getting old, but don't want to build, I'd recommend cheaper gaming oriented sellers. I've never bought from them, but Cyberpower always seemed pretty legit, and it should be a decent amount cheaper too. Edit: I've never used Alienware, but if it's built like a Dell, I'd imagine it might be more difficult to upgrade or repair then a home built PC, just because they have different form factors.

This photo reminds me of the photos we got from the Voyager probes journey. Very awesome!

Tesla or Einstein for me!

Nice man! I was working on Fobos using a few mods, but I got busy and never finished. Was a few installations ago. Gotta say, I think it's one of the prettier unmanned space probe designs. Can't wait to see your finished product. I wish the probe wasn't unsuccessful because I imagine photos from the service of Phobos would be awesome!

Gonna love using that Fobo core to recreate Fobos-Grunt

Dig the work all of you have done. I've noticed almost all the people who make these cinematics have fantastic taste in music! Boards of Canada and Brian Eno just make great soundtracks to space!

Running at 2 gigs on 32bit, but recently switched to 64bit since I stopped playing career mode. Edit: Sorry was on my phone, I should explain it better. It's currently around 2 gigs, but goes as high as 2.7 because I add things. In 32bit w/ ATM, it ran pretty flawlessly. I feel like career mode related mods don't like 64bit from my experience, or the other way around, so after getting back into sandbox mode, I realized I should just try 64bit again, and it's working good, and I removed ATM. I forgot I had texture resolution set to half though, and I put it back on full and this caused 64bit to crash as soon as I went to launch a rocket. I feel like even though 64bit allows more ram to be used, going over about 4 gigs will still cause the game to crash, so it's really not many benefits to it at the moment, for me atleast. I do feel like I get better performance in general from 64bit, but then again, it could be placebo.

Nice Molniyas. I've been doing those lately too. It's much easier to spread them out compared to KSO orbit sats, IMO.

Here's my main go to for Kerbin SOI coverage. Still has upper stage attached to it, so don't mind the Saturn V style painted part. I'm so nitpicky about how my satellites look, I literally spend way to long in the VAB and never actually get the missions done. Don't got a picture of their layout yet, but I place three in KSO at least.

Cool. Yeah, don't know why I didn't think to look there. ðŸ˜Â