NihilRex

You could install Firespitter without MKS, if you simply want that functionality. The issue is that without MKS, the various modules will not do their jobs, so perhaps you could explain your desire a bit more clearly?

Cheetah - You will have to do it yourself. The closest I can suggest is to RMM to a docking port on the same craft, then you can undock and fly into the bin yourself.

Same issues as OmegaCenti for part costs on Linux x64.

Angel - I couldnt find with a quick search, do the OKS hab ring and aeroponics work with the MCM? I am trying to design a onesizefitsall lifter and tug, and wondering whether i should be using the homestead or MCM.

I don't see why it couldn't handle landed rendesvous. I am much less sure about KAS flextube -type docking, but I'd guess maybe, if done right.

FYI - The Routine Mission Manager mod conflicts with this mod, and makes this mod non-functional. Working on a test fix, if it works, I'll notify the RMM developer.

FYI - This conflicts with the Hangar Mod, and makes that mod non-functional.

Delete MM_USI.CFG

Interesting idea, time for testing

Thanks for the fast response Angel!

You have said that the Ponderosa does not need efficiency modules. Does it consume punchcards when in a mode that normal consumes cards? If it is a Kerbitat, how many Kerbals does it support? Does it benefit from having inflatable habitats from MKS added to the craft? What about your own inflatable efficiency modules? Same question for the Aeroponics, etc.

Awesome! Testing begins, and I will write Karbonite and K+ Configs for this.

Looks interesting. Like the use of an existing resourse.

The science cost of upgrades rolls over, and turns into a -212328397234 type number.

I did hit max cost, but with career being the way it is, Im unlocking the whole tech tree early and still having tons of science on hand. 30 sounds about right for science upgrades. I like building large rockets very quickly...

UpgradeScienceFormula = 2^([N]+2) * 1.0 After enough upgrades, the science cost goes negative. Is there any way to fix that expression without changing behavior?

Is there any interest in a MissionPack for this? I've got quite a few I use, but now Im considering doing some all stock and sharing.

So simple, shoulda been stock.

Wait, it replaces the MKS modules? All of them, or just the regular ones?

Does it go nuts if the strutbeams touch each other?

KAS is surface attach only. AFAIK there is no way to do what you ask. Just place it where it should go, and pretend it is using the stackattach node.

If he does make it storable, it will be a large item. Better solution is still probably to just mount one on a KAS rack.

Looks very nice! Cannot wait to see it running. Also, you are much better at blender than I am, and I spent almost a month trying.

Has to start from the launchpad, Im afraid you'll have to design a cheaper launch vehicle.

The recovered parts piece of this makes standardizing boosters so much more efficient. Even without your scrapping method.