Fluburtur

58 positive for the win

59 we need more +

nice pic Oversinker

65 come on

My plane did make it to orbit, between 73 and 80Km or else I wouldn't have made it to the other side of the planet (I know, I tried the circumnavigation with it) This plane is really amazing, I made it quite quickly and he can do everything.

Granted but you are immediatly sunk. I wish I could fly.

65 we will win

Last time I was listening to the full Tome 1 of Kaamelott, very nice if you happen to speak french. And if you absolutely want music lately I have been listening to that band (thanks Rick and Morty)

63 yay

60 almost there

449 déficit testiculaire 450 c'est de la politique le déficit testiculaire I have a text file full of stupid thing me and my friends says and this one a part of today's contribution, it's kinda about me

PPSH 41, I play that gun all the time in red Orchestra 2

53 come on

52 nah

Land a plane backward

52 #Nôpe

Here is my entry, I read the forum an hour ago and I was like "huh I should try that" so I converted one of my planes into a SSTO and tried it. Sorry I picked quite a bad time and had to land in the night. I forgot to f3 but I think it's acceptable, I was a bit short on oxydiser but I had enough liquid fuel to correct it. It's also my first SSTO that works. (I played full stock)

44, we're doing it

I think it would be nice to have a "overheat" indicator in the ressource panel, as well as predicted overheat when building so we can see how much heat are dissipating the radiators and when we would need them.

"this plane was raised by cars and now he thinks he is one" Well, this one gets my vote

Someone developped a radar that can detect the F-35, it uses vacuum tubes. Always learn, don't juste let someone telle you something is good. Ask why, question yourself, learn everything. Because juste letting them got ideas into your brains is propaganda.

I got some interest in learning about the F-22, yes it looks good and pull out too much Gs for the pilots (why they don't like the plane) but his computer is less powerfull than a Ipad2 and it can only communicate with other F-22s, murika has spent a lot of money trying to fix that but they have a hard time and the only real mission this plane had was almost failed and could have been done by an old plane (they found their target with social media, worth the money heh). Also there are less than 200 planes and they cost a lot, you can get 10 rafales for the price of one F-22 and the total cost of development and tweaks make his price go to half a billion. So yes, it looks good on air show but it might be the only thing they are good at. And don't even think about the F-35, learn a bit about it and you will see it's just an expensive brick, the "revolutionary radar camouflage" is a 30 years old trick already used on the f-117

I give it to you, the F-22 looks very good but the Rafale equals it, if no more. During the 2009 International Air Tactical Leadership Cours the Rafale had to fight against Eurofighters and F-22s. It beaten the Eurofighters 4-0 and 3-1 and it scared the F-22s a lot. After that journalist said the F-22s had external tanks lowering their performances but pictures taken by the Rafale's targeting cam clearly shows they had no tanks, and if you want there is a video you have to skip to around 2 minutes to see the actual dogfight.During the exercise there were 6 engagment, une F-22 had a gun kill and the other 5 were ex-aeqo. The Americans also wanted to have only short range fight, unlike you would do in modern combat (the F-22 is stealthy but the Rafale is like "nah I don't need a radar my targeting cam can see thing 20km away) And here are my sources, it's french but it's pretty much what I said 1 2 Also the F-22 does one thing well, air combat. The F-35 tries to do everything good but it makes it mediocre and the Rafale is good as a fighter and a bomber.

Switch to your debris, timewarp and wait.

I saw it my entire life so I don't really see any problem with it but I get your point. COME TO FRANCE AND SEE MY FANCYNESS YOU PEASANTS