Jump to content

Razorfang

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    43

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Razorfang

  1. Razorfang
    I have the same problem. A quicksave/reload fixed the WASD problem, but still cannot grab ladders or enter pods. the F and B keys seem to not work. It started just after landing on the moon and using the F2 mode to take a screenshot. i9 10900k, RTX3080, 64GB RAM
  2. Razorfang
    Any recommendations on a LS mod to use with this? TAC used to work with the EC generators in the background, but it no longer does. Do people know of any of them that do work with KSPI?
  3. Razorfang
    I'm getting the same NRE spam that @Apaseall is getting. Logs --> https://www.dropbox.com/s/59apmlkzi4aeh71/AmpYear Resource NRE Log.zip?dl=0 Reproduction Steps: 1. Create a vehicle with A Drill-o-Matic and a Convert-o-Tron 250. 2. Deploy drill and start LFO conversion. 3. Wait about 15-30 seconds. The second test took longer to start spamming. It began when I highlighted a different part of the vessel. I originally thought it was a glitch introduced by one of my many, many other add-ons, but it persists with a clean install with just AmpYear.
  4. Razorfang
    @HunterForce You need to get the dev build. Any addons which change timewarp have to be fixed/recompiled.
  5. Razorfang
    Has anyone had issues with NRE spam when trying to adjust timewarp? I know other mods are having issues since 1.1.3, and I wonder if this one has the same problem.
  6. Razorfang
    Getting NRE spam on 1.1.3. Same as what's happening on KAC. (Filename: Line: -1) MissingMethodException: Method not found: 'TimeWarp.SetRate'. at RemoteTech.FlightComputer.FlightComputer.OnUpdate () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0 at RemoteTech.Modules.ModuleSPU.Update () [0x00000] in <filename unknown>:0
  7. Razorfang
    @leomike Sad, but totally understandable. The power generation in KSPIe is horribly complex. Unfortunately that kills this mod for me in this playthru. I'll have to revisit it in my next one.
  8. Razorfang
    I finally got to the point in my career save where I'm landing my first mining lander and I found that the KSPIe reactors are not generating any EC in the background. Is KSPIe supported?
  9. Razorfang
    I absolutely love this mod, but I'm running into a problem that is quickly making it unplayable. The background processing does not seem to scale well with larger numbers of vessels. I have 44 flights in progress and I'm getting about a 2.5:1 slowdown. I'm not certain that it's just Kerbalism causing the problem, but I do see that the background processing loops through every part on every ship in every update. Is anyone else having similar problems, or is this just me?
  10. Razorfang
    The second one. I haven't encountered the mass increasing bug yet. That FAR problem was due to incorrect mass calculations.
  11. Razorfang
    Same issue as @TMS, also believe this is causing NRE spam for me. Never mind that. NRE spam is caused by something else. Trying to trace it now.
  12. Razorfang
    OK, thanks. I've run into this big with tweakscale and FAR recently so I was wondering if it was a problem with this addon as well. Thanks for all your hard work.
  13. Razorfang
    Has the issue with modifying the part mass been fixed yet? Just wondering if it is still a problem.
  14. Razorfang
    Another Idea perhaps is to cap the about they can change the lifespan based on research. Allow none at the start and then +-10% after x node and so forth. That way late game you could buy off the penalty after you've reached a point that you'll be launching decade+ missions.
  15. Razorfang
    I compiled the changes to test on my testing install and it seems to be working fine. Still takes longer than stock to load, but that is to be expected. Nowhere near the 2-5 minute load times on simple ships I saw before.
  16. Razorfang
    Perhaps an idea for the malfunction issue would be to add a tweakable that'd increase the lifespan of a part for a cost. You could even allow the player to shorten the lifespan from default to save money too. My opinion is that it shouldn't be a 1:1 scaling however. Like 3x the cost increases the lifespan 2x, and 1/2 the cost reduces the lifespan to 1/3. It'd be nice to allow short life probes and missions to cost less, but allow longer missions to avoid malfunctions for a cost.
  17. Razorfang
    AH, my mistake. Good fix is still good then. Thank you so much.
  18. Razorfang
    Looks like he fixed it, then reverted the fix because it would have a bad interaction with FAR.
  19. Razorfang
    Does this release disable the signal mechanics with RemoteTech? I'll try that too.
  20. Razorfang
    Since Deep freeze was mentioned, I need to ask. Does radiation exposure still accrue when a Kerbal is frozen by this mod? It would make the freezers even more useful if it did not.
  21. Razorfang
    @ferram4 Looking through all the stock wings, they all use quadratic scaling. Though I agree that default assuming this is a recipe for disaster. @pellinor I think it'd be best for everyone to make a way to return the mass scale since it can be set independent of the scale factor. Any other mods that change the mass values are at risk of this behavior.
  22. Razorfang
    @NathanKell Thank you for looking in to this. I hope you can get to the bottom of this. While this is not a "required" mod for me, it makes the game much more enjoyable. This bug makes it unplayable if using a large number of procedural parts.
  23. Razorfang
    @Svm420I think you hit the nail on the head. The control surfaces use free_square scale type, which sets the mass exponent to 2. I wonder if there's a way to query the mass exponent from TweakScale at runtime? The MassScale is a public variable, can you just check the value of massScale directly?
  24. Razorfang
    @Svm420 Try scaling it to 50% or less and see if it reoccurs. It did for me.
  25. Razorfang
    It made the problem not happen as often, but it still occurs on several parts. It seems that the heavier the part, the easier it is to cause. Is perhaps part of the problem that the mass gets doubly subtracted since Tweakscale changes the area supported as well as change the mass?
×
×
  • Create New...