Jump to content

Brownie352

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Brownie352

  1. Oh, I did another test and it seems some other visual mod must be causing the trouble... Hope you didn't waste much time trying to troubleshoot my stuff.. Thank you for the quick feedback. If I find the culprit I'll edit this comment for the solution, sorry for the silly question
  2. Hello, I downloaded the mod and it looks very nice, I've tested it on Kerbin and it runs well but when I'm on the Mun the fps drop to unbearable levels, I'm not sure if I have installed something wrong I'll send you a message of the ksp.log if you want. (I have 8 gigs ram, I don't know if that's the issue)(Edit 2:The ksp.log)
  3. So it won't be made by squad? Hope it has more realistic aerodynamics :D! Can't want to see gameplay footage from it!
  4. I'm wondering why nasa wants to build the gateway,the only convincing argument was for manned experiments also why would you need the gateway to go to mars you need more dv by having a rendezvous with the station, right? I'm not a scientist but it doesn't make sense to me (Sorry if i posted this in the wrong topic)
  5. If moon landing is real then why did the astronauts not sink on the cheesy surface of the manmade satelite? Explain this HA!
  6. Going to mars without a camp building experience doesn't sound right to me. In such a complex mission the odds of something going kapoot aren't low (parts breaking,people needing surgery etc),so mars doesn't look good on that. To land on mars you need to have solved the refueling on the surface of mars issue which i doubt we will have solved as early as the first crewed mission on either bodies.If you were to ask me i would call for a Venusian Flyby the main issue with that being the increased radiation from the sun.
  7. Are there any current Concepts or in development spacecraft to land people to mars and return them to earth?
  8. Looks nice, i'll have to refine my designs since they vibrate so much the wings fall off sometimes from the vibrations
  9. Make rovers more useful, and make science on the surface more interesting than taping the goo collector, maybe caves
  10. Specs:1 kerbal command pod ,3 fleas. Target: To island and back. After having removed one stage and second stage is dry 1 rough landing later Aproaching the runway: Landed back ! Ps:The last flea is inside the fairing
  11. Hey what about future ksp updates i mean will squad update the game engine so the multi core cpus get faster on the game?
  12. Cant you put an ssd and an hdd on the same system?
  13. Can you predict how much fps i would get with the pc i told you on stock ksp on a 300 part craft? (Sorry for double post : /
  14. So do you think that with a i3 6100 a gtx 1050ti and 8 gigs ram i can play ksp with visual mods and good part counts at "good fps" ?
  15. Hey guys can someone tell me which cpu is better for ksp and how big is the difference between the 2 ? :i5 6500. I3 6100
  16. The most kerbalistic rocket : N1 i mean..LOOK AT THOOSE FIREWORKS !!
  17. Hey i dont know someone has suggested that but definetely you should make a moon the size of gilly or smaller (2/3 sounds good ; ))) hope you like my idea : D
  18. Wow it was really entertaining for me to read your journey nice boat you got there btw
  19. Guys i searched on youtube for turboprop tutorials but havent found any so if you want this thread to get people around you probably wanna make a turboprop tutorial on youtube so it can get some hype like mrnuclearturkey electric prop tutorial Cool seems you put a lot of effort in this btw how s your fps with this engine ?
  20. Is that stock propeler - piston engine? Seems really good btw is the backround bugged or what?
  21. How do you post youtube videos on forums0.O How do you post youtube videos on forums 0.O??
×
×
  • Create New...