whale_2

Done for 1.3 as well. Link to .dll compiled for 1.3

I allowed myself to recompile ActiveStruts for 1.2 and it seems to work. Going to do so for 1.3. It may or may not work - it's in no way an official release, it just works for me. Use at your own risk. Hope I didn't do something that will be frowned upon. Pull request sent to maintainers. DLL and source on GitHub

Sure. Fuel costs funds. And apparently price is higher than in SPH/VAB. Not sure why it is so. Nevertheless, fuel is very cheap.

@Angel-125 When you airship is close to fuel tanks, click KK icon, press 'Show/hide open facilities' (or smth like that) and choose Fuel Tanks. Then you will be able to choose which internal tank to fill.

New build pushed to github. Improved interaction with EVA Fuel and EVA Follower If someone could please test it on different ships and situations, it would be nice. That will allow me to add some contracts and release the whole thing.

NavUtilities HSI & ILS works just fine, integrated into RPM and has data for all Kerbin Side runways and helipads (somewhere in original Kerbin Side thread). Is there a need to duplicate this functionality in KK? What could be needed, however, is inclusion of runway data into Kerbin Side package.

Indeed, the frame rate improved, excellent work, @Ger_space!

Just wow.

@SpannerMonkey(smce), you mean it was not so in 0.9.9.6?

And seems like I was wrong about 0.9.9.2. Performance of 0.9.9.1 is OK (on my potato) while 0.9.9.2 is not.

Same issue. 0.9.9.2 seems OK. Gonna try other pre-releases to pin it down.

You mean - just bring Kerbal Konstructs into stock game? It'd be nice, but seems unrealistic.

Uh. Spacedock link says this: Unauthorized The server could not verify that you are authorized to access the URL requested. You either supplied the wrong credentials (e.g. a bad password), or your browser doesn't understand how to supply the credentials required.

We need more chatter! I already can understand and repeat every word they say.

I've just changed the way the jetpack is blocked in that cases where it is not allowed. Fuel is intact, but the jetpack is locked. Main reason was not to clash with EvaFuel . Giving tourist a reduced amount of fuel seems to me like "you first learn to swim, then we'll fill the pool with water". Less fuel does not mean more safety, it's quite the opposite. What really could make sense is limiting jetpack thrust for less experienced tourists - I'll check if this is possible in a reasonable way.

Oh, nice. I hope the mod will make a bit more sense when I add contracts that require tourists on EVA.

Fixed tourists not being reverted to tourist when recovered from Tracking Station or KSC view. Now all kerbals in scene smile or react the way they find more appropriate when one of the tourists takes selfie. Reaction is based on courage/stupidity. Less courageous tend to express fear more often, more stupid tend to smile wider.

I tried something similar, but seems like autostruts are gone only if reset on every FixedUpdate(). Wheels start behaving funny, like if they were attached by a long soft spring.

Added selfies. Now kerbal will randomly smile or express fear. Selfies go into Screenshots. It has no real value as of now, except of fun, but could be later added as a contract requirement.

Config has been changed from XML to CFG.

Yes, I've completely missed whole point of MM. Sure will move this to CFG.

Updated version with EVA fuel restriction is on Github.

At the moment the mod is not tested enough, but later I think it could make sense to merge it into this (if @nightingale will like this idea) :

Yes, they still have trait 'Tourist', i.e. they can not pilot a craft, reset experiments, fix landing gear and attach things. They, however, can carry things in backpack when KIS is in use

This is Mark Shuttleworth de-boarding Soyuz capsule. http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/license/1539857 Mine, and some other people's point was about this - allow them to disembark in certain conditions. On the other hand, in human history there were only handful Moon missions (and no tourists), while in KSP landing on Mün is a routine operation. I guess when in not-so-far future we will have real Moon tourism, the tourists will be allowed to set their foot on Moon surface (maybe for additional price, but who cares)