Jump to content

FireKerb

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    80

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by FireKerb

  1. FireKerb
    It can't be Science because the panel itself is at 0. Again, I still think it's a mod bug or something.
  2. FireKerb
    When did your ship get embedded?
  3. FireKerb
    Uh.... Run?
  4. FireKerb
    You made a wish. I wish I would make a wish.
  5. FireKerb
    This would be much more fitting. Let's just hope it doesn't explode.
  6. FireKerb
    The expensiveness was just the salt in the wound. As stated by many others, the danger is the biggest killer.
  7. FireKerb
    That looks like a modded solar panel. Stock panels are alot more blue: https://wiki.kerbalspaceprogram.com/wiki/File:OX-STAT.png Also the static panel (or any panel, I think) should not have tracking body. Or maybe I'm misremembering.
  8. FireKerb
    The video is too grainy. Maybe send a picture of the lander in the VAB. But it's probably a bug.
  9. FireKerb
    Firstly, sorry for getting angry. It was just some personal matters leaking into forum stuff. A reverse jet engine, where you get the fuel from the atmosphere and bring your own oxidizer would probably work on Eve, especially considering that the seas are made of explodium.
  10. FireKerb
    Now how long do you think it took to get all that knowledge about balloons? A year? A decade? A millennium? Maybe two? If you don't know how hard programming is, don't act like an expert about it.
  11. FireKerb
    So how do balloons work in real life? How is the air kept in? Why do they go up? Why do some materials expand but others not? Just because it's not rocket science doesn't mean it's easy.
  12. FireKerb
    Making a new engine is easy. All you have to do is plug in a few numbers. Making a new game mechanic is hard. When you have world hunger and war as some of the harder things, that analogy sorta falls apart. And if you don't know how to program, then how do you know how easy it is?
  13. FireKerb
    The point is that it's much harder that clicking a button. Such effort is better spent on bugfixing and troubleshooting.
  14. FireKerb
    Cool! Now program it into KSP.
  15. FireKerb
    How does being in a canyon disrupt communication. And this "cheat" you talk about... if timeWarp = true { move = don't; } If only it were that easy.
  16. FireKerb
    On rails is how KSP physics works when either on "Green" time warp or outside the physics bubble. Aero is not simulated, so the balloon would drop dead. And again, you can still have the dish on the ground.
  17. FireKerb
    We already have planes. And how would using balloons to support a relay be useful compared to having it on the ground. Or in orbit. Besides, a remodel of on-rails will have to happen for this to work.
  18. FireKerb
    What should they look like then? How should they function? Questions like these can take a long time to answer. I'd like to see you try to make the model for it, though.
  19. FireKerb
    Batteries (and power in general) have always co-existed with power methods such as solar and RTG. Adding more engines may not have more depth, but engines themselves add depth.
  20. FireKerb
    No. I'm saying it adds no depth. Anybody can strap a few balloons to a rocket.
  21. FireKerb
    But you're still just strapping a load of balloons to a rocket.
  22. FireKerb
    Right. How does this add depth beyond just strapping a load of them to a rocket?
  23. FireKerb
    Are you in signal range of the KSC?
  24. FireKerb
    I was talking about the question the OP had.
  25. FireKerb
    But the speed will vary from using the Sun as a reference point and the Earth.
×
×
  • Create New...