Jump to content

SOXBLOX

Members
  • Posts

    961
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by SOXBLOX

  1. Pretty sure they had discussed recovering the second stage with a propulsive landing, but dropped the concept, because it had no major benefit. In case you hadn't noticed, the second stage is a perfect cylinder, minus the rocket nozzle. And how about Electron reuse? It has no wings. It survived reentry with just thrusters. Yeah, but I would like to point out that the Shuttle and Ares 1 were camels, a horse designed by committee. Starship is designed with a specific, constant mission set in mind, and that's a huge difference.
  2. Ah, but using Kerbiloid's logic, this is just a prototype, and has no bearing on the actual product. Anyways, I stand corrected. But, this tug, and the hypothetical station, is brought to us by the same people who built a station module, and then rebuilt it, and then repaired their rebuild, and repaired their repairs, and so on, and are only now, 13+ years past the original launch date, vaguely ready to put it in space. I think I'll wait and see. Meanwhile, I bet my money against an indigenous station being built.
  3. Can I offer a correction? Fine. "[Congressional representatives'] interests should not be indicators of viability." There.
  4. Um, no. They're called control surfaces for a reason. Look, I figure these people know what they're doing. And just because a high percentage of the small number of human-carrying return vehicles have had a certain shape does not mean that all future vehicles must have that shape. What are you worried will happen? Do you think Starship won't be able to control itself properly; or that it will break up on reentry, or something else?
  5. Four flights. The Soviets were too cheap to build a test stand.
  6. Not always, but it can come close. And it's getting closer. The T-7 Red Hawk trainer/light attack aircraft was designed and tested almost entirely electronically.
  7. They're being built, unlike this hypothetical station and nuclear tug.
  8. All of which an unmanned satellite can watch for much less Δv and money. There's no benefit to having a near-polar station, as far as I can see. I doubt the funding will ever get through for a fully indigenous station. More likely no station is built for a while. I wanna see what size inflatable module can fit in that payload fairing. Probably yuge.
  9. Yeah. But, why is a station viewing these latitudes useful? Access is harder, because of the inclination, which is a con. What are the pros? And yes, I know what a map looks like.
  10. AWESOMENESS!!! Also, is it true Ingenuity carries part of the Wright Flyer?
  11. I know this region is heating up geopolitically, but what benefits are there to having a station in a polar orbit? If you wanna see the poles, just use a satellite, right? Yeah, I'll believe this stuff when I see it. Until then, dream on, Dmitri Olegovich.
  12. This just looks so beautiful. Way better than any mod I've seen. And, yeah, great music!
  13. Somebody call the doctor, 'cause my heart just stopped.
  14. I wouldn't be surprised if it really does consume net energy. A safer bet, though, would be bamboo. Or cardboard.
  15. I don't see that. The AF never clarified. Longest US shot previously was an AIM-54, which hit a target drone at 132 mi (212 km). So, it's further than that.
  16. Also, this. I do wonder if this is the longest AAM shot for the US specifically, or worldwide.
  17. Wow, I've never heard those terms before. Learn something new every day!
  18. Aaaaand then there's this: So, don't these hypothetical magic tanks depend on internal pressure to remain strong? There's a difference between tensile strength and compression/load-bearing strength... Edit: Oops, thought my replies would merge.
  19. Totally not Tsircon! Not sure whether this guy even qualifies for layman. Great comedian, though.
  20. This is just Electron, but minus New Zealand It'll be interesting to see if they go anywhere. The three-way symmetry on their larger launcher is an interesting choice. Has it ever been done before?
  21. Oh, heck, no. Any single guy who claims to be outdoing the entire American aerospace industry is a quack, at the least. Cute little linear aerospike on the last one, along with his main tank "oirentation". I don't see mention of a cooling system, either. The SR-71 needed a complex air conditioner system to keep the pilot from cooking. So, for 244 people, at Mach 9... And that "fighter"... A Mach 10 ejection seat alone would be a huge challenge, yeah? But a whole fighter! LOL.
  22. Oh, I thought it was LockMart, BO, and GA separately, not Lockheed and BO/GA. Nevermind, then. And yeah, I know GA well.
  23. I'll bet BO partners with some other company for the nuclear aspect. IDK who...
×
×
  • Create New...