Jump to content

goldenpeach

Moderator
  • Posts

    1,416
  • Joined

Everything posted by goldenpeach

  1. I think you should be able to use them everywhere:being in vacuum don't prevent you of firing rockets. Of course, it might not be a good idea, but you should be able to do it anyway.
  2. Source: Facebook status from SpaceX. Unfortunately, I haven't found any article/website/forum saying the same thing(you can find some article on the test).
  3. So what,he will just stand on the top,chairs are overrated anyway... This is the last scheduled flight of the Grasshoper rig:( The next test are low altitude test of the Falcon 9 Reusable (F9R) development vehicle(it will then be hight altitude)
  4. That's not a reason to not bring it into space
  5. If you change your mind and decide to do it in python,I can show you a really good website to learn it(in french). Anyway, good luck for your project!
  6. Granted,but nobody will listen to them anymore. i wish I could fly.
  7. False(unfortunately). The user below me like XKCD and SMBC.
  8. False. The user below me like Boney M.
  9. Because the "IVA" is supposed to be a sort of first-person view. And I know that during lift-off, your head shake(unfortunately,I don't know it by personal experience ). I think that's why the OP want that camera shake.
  10. Would be pretty cool, as long as the kerbal can have parachute
  11. No, serious math start before that. the user below me know how to use i to make a real number(of course, we don't accept answer such as i^2) I know two way to do that: e^(pi*i)=-1 e^(0.5*pi)*(i^i)=1
  12. The other solution would be to give all the power to the engineers:they can do whatever they want as long as it fit the budget. Of course,no politician will accept to lose their power
  13. I don't think the kind of black-out you describe should be implanted. However, it would be cool to have a black-out system!
  14. The leak on the SRB was noticed long ago, why didn't the NASA replaced it? Does the engineers underestimated the risk? Does the fault goes to the administration? Thank you for reading this (short) thread!
  15. Banned because I can't think of a reason to ban you(and that's your fault )
  16. No,but one of my friend is. He talked about the "printemps érable" and it got my curiosity;I did some search on google. That's how I recognize 728. But I guess you are from Quebec? I like Quebec!
  17. Menard commission is for you!
  18. Banned for having a number of post(162) that can be divided by 3.
  19. False. The user below me has found my secrete message.
  20. Banned for banning me one minute after I banned someone.
  21. Banned for having a image which involve the space kraken
×
×
  • Create New...