-
Posts
7,207 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Developer Articles
KSP2 Release Notes
Everything posted by CatastrophicFailure
-
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Nothing of... huge interest. Top left looks like up inside, looking at the lower tank butt. You can see the manifold for the fuel lines, similar to recent SLS photos. Top right is a tank dome hidden behind shipping containers. bottom left is just the flank of the beast. Bottom right is the same tank dome closer. -
Starlink Thread (split from SpaceX)
CatastrophicFailure replied to DAL59's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Likely a big reason why they chose to go the AI route, with human oversight. It doesn’t have to be perfect, it only has to pare out a small enough number of potential collisions that the human overseers can reasonably verify and actively monitor. -
Starlink Thread (split from SpaceX)
CatastrophicFailure replied to DAL59's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Not at all, eventually they’ll all just clump together and can be moved out of the way with a gentle push... -
Starlink Thread (split from SpaceX)
CatastrophicFailure replied to DAL59's topic in Science & Spaceflight
And Starlink will have its own automatic anti-collision system, as well as ground monitoring by multiple systems. How is that even relevant? A sat that’s low on fuel will be safely deorbited and no longer a concern. Also: Yeah, this whole non-issue is just ESA grandstanding for their own product. -
Starlink Thread (split from SpaceX)
CatastrophicFailure replied to DAL59's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Just for comparison, on average there are around 12,000 aircraft in the air at any given time*, which are much bigger than Starlinks, in a much smaller “shell” of space. They are highly regulated, and very rarely hit each other at altitude. The whole Kessler syndrome thing is way overblown. People forget that space is big. Really, really, big. And the farther out you go the bigger it gets. And most things that aren’t far out don’t stay up forever. *And as high as 19,000 at once, I recall reading. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
“Don’t dead, open inside” Not unusual for airplanes, rockets tho... I’d be surprised to see SLS bits just sitting out like that, or even Atlas. Musk does want to make the whole mess more airplane-like, tho, hmm...m -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
I love that there are bits of rocket ships just laying around outside like that. Looks like they’re working on a new tent Quonset hut shelter space, too, and maybe the beginning of another ring jig? Now, if I were the head of that there steelworks, knowing there were drones overhead all hours of the day, I’d start leaving all kindsa stuff laying around just to mess with people... 10m steel ring... surplus space shuttle wing... giant rubber chicken with a sailor hat and a vat of mayo from Costco... -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
So this is interesting... like train wreck interesting... Apparently SpaceX allegedly “refused” to move a StarLink sat out of the way of an ESA bird. Now, according to the train wreck comments, the only Starlink at a similar altitude to the ESA sat is one of two that’s slowly deorbiting itself, which +the slow-responding ion thruster May have been the reason it couldn’t move. Whole thing needs to be taken with a great big grain of salt for now, but there it is. ETA: Better article, mentioning a different computer pegged the chance of a collision as pretty negligible. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Top.... men.... -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
SpaceX already has the whole VTVL thing down pretty good, they arguably have a better understanding of it than anyone else in the industry right now. What they don’t have is flight data on reentry and descent on their unprecedented plan of doing so. There’s probably not a whole lot more they could learn from Hoppy, that’s why the first Starship test will be all the way to the edge of space and back— that remains the big unknown. Once Starship is back down low and going butt-first on a pillar of fire, that’s actually the easy part. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
What’s that thing above the C-5, left of the shuttle? RHOMBUS? Looks like a great big aerospike... uses it as a heat shield on reentry? Then stubby wings for some control to a vertical landing? MOAR BOOSTERS! optional? -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
. . . *Points at Owners of All Media Disney* -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Nope, just a single Tyrannosaurus Rex. dat roar doe And not ones to rest on their laurels, apparently SpaceX is also aiming at the opposite end of the spectrum: -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Whoah. And whoah! And also, whoah. Them are some... aggressive time frames... I wonder why more delay on the presentation, tho? What are they, for lack of a better phrase, “hiding?” -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Well, at least we know why they had issues with the FAA over altitude, they couldn’t accept the “return data from upper atmosphere” contract yet. -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
haven’t seen this mentioned yet... apparently right at the end you can see one of the COPV’s get liberated and go flying off on its own... -
totm nov 2023 SpaceX Discussion Thread
CatastrophicFailure replied to Skylon's topic in Science & Spaceflight
Daaaaaaaaaang! I was not expecting the flight to last that long! What’s the longest burn we know of for a Raptor at this point?