itsme86

Does anyone have a build for this mod that works for 1.6.1?

Thank you! I love this mod!

There's a pretty excellent list here: Community Mods and Plugins Library - Sticky

A couple of things I've noticed that weren't mentioned: 1) Going EVA (at least from the Mk1 cockpit) seems to launch the kerbal more than it used to. Before 0.25 the kerbal would start EVA holding onto the module. Now it fairly well launches him away. 2) The TT-70 decoupler doesn't seem to have as much ejection force or it's at least changed in some way that's caused me to start using sepratrons where I didn't used to have to.

Is that a mod or something? Parts I haven't researched yet don't show up in the VAB for me to click on. Are you talking about the new hard difficulty where you need to buy the part after researching the node?

Where do you think we get stuff like ore (and other goodies) in the real world?

Parroting others, but wanted to get my piece in anyway. Thank you for your great contributions! Best of luck to you.

Very helpful addon! Thanks!

This mod is awesome. Thank you.

No need to be jealous. Even you can join twitter. Completely free of charge!

Why all the speculation? They told you exactly what was coming in 0.23 in a post that is stickied to the right-side of every page: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/content/234-0-23-Update-News Why had no-one linked that yet?

Have you considered how annoying this would be with timewarp? You fly one mission to Jool and all the crap you had on other planets and in orbit is all decayed and broken. Unless you're the kind of person that works on other missions while your craft is drifting to the next burn. I don't think most people play that way though.

Nice Ender's Game reference

I'm betting that the people that say they don't have the problem either: a) have a more forgiving aspect ratio or resolution that diminishes the effect, or have the problem but didn't understand what I meant. I can tell you that I didn't go manually change any config file that caused this problem.

I'm fully aware of language barrier issues. However, inconsistencies in spelling within the same post for the same word (plain vs plane or trust vs thrust for instance) in addition to a brief perusal of other posts by this individual indicate that that isn't the problem.

Spell check FTW.

That's better than the way it runs on any other O/S.

That's almost exactly what my Duna rover looked like. Same frame and wheel configuration at least.

Knowing which wheels you're referring to would also help. Different wheels have different characteristics.

My monitor is flat. I can't tell if you're being serious or not with this suggestion. Yes! That! Exactly.

Nice tip. I have noticed a lag of a few seconds when undoing sometimes, especially if the undo is associated with many parts. And since there's no indication that it's "busy" trying to undo, I sometimes get impatient while waiting and press the undo key combination again thinking I had messed it up the previous time. Cutting out the lag should help keep me from over undoing.

You're playing this at work, aren't you? ALT + F4 will save your job but not your game.

The votes are in. Crack it is! Thanks guys. At least now I'm sure about my insanity.

What about all 3 behavior? x = cut throttle alt + x = full throttle ctrl + x = restore throttle (behaves like alt + x if throttle changed since last cut, or maybe does nothing?)

It seems like performing an undo action (CTRL + z) in the VAB performs differently than it used to. The difference is that now a copy of the parts that were moved are left behind and they weren't before 0.21. I might be wrong, but I just want to make sure I didn't miss a notice about an intended change. I haven't done a lot of scenario testing with this, but I can consistently reproduce this by detaching a part from my ship and dropping the newly detached part somewhere to the side. Then I press CTRL + z and the detached part becomes reattached to the ship, but a copy of the part is left where I dropped it. If memory serves, the part used to reattach, but the a copy would not be left behind. Does anyone remember this behaving differently before 0.21? Am I on crack?