Jump to content

WinkAllKerb''

Members
  • Posts

    1,661
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by WinkAllKerb''

  1. we might need a slow motion replay, not sure ...
  2. j'aimerais pouvoir en dire autant xDr mais en dehors des programme pour enfants je regarde pas grand choses ...
  3. *in* do not mistake "capitalism model in theory" and "nowdays resulting capitalism" ... i m not convinced the model impacted individual as expected @pretty and mostly short/medium term ... *out*
  4. Don't panic you can find a lot of thoose on earth.
  5. Cood idea, but promise to share your best one and not the relax one ; ) definetely need to see you play at your best and not in two fingers relax mode ; )
  6. http://forum.unity3d.com/threads/unity-5-release-date.235223/ may be they were already working on it // 1.0 release ... not sure
  7. banned because you don't like to play counter strike ; ) oh that ... nevermind 23 ; )
  8. For now mostly watching for visual/aesthetics enhancement/"parts variety" vanilla (notice this is specific to SE and i don't apply the same reasoning for KSP, for wich i found cartoonistic approach better just missing a few more texture homogenisation) and planet implementation (// with medieval engi) before going back in. (as the scenaristic scripting is on going since a few update wich is pretty cool 4 solo and multi related to SE) Also mostly see SE in it's current form like a reduced and rough muddler of/for "star citizen" in some aspect and in term of potential long term ... time will tell (and i expect it too be much more than that)
  9. there some more or less similars concepts yup: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/55401-Community-Mods-and-Plugins-Library
  10. http://blog.marekrosa.org/ i don't like the multiplayer pew pew pow pow boom boom aspect wich to me is a poor commercial choice in the said "game universe" aside that it's a very good concept and dev team. i would have prefered to see something like fighting "space dinosaur" or "alien" than being that much "human player vs human player" oriented but hey ; you know ; investor behind and tralalala exchange market ...
  11. i tweet with my mouth does that count ? xDr TUBM may ask mods a question in some well known thread xDr ?
  12. banned because you don't like eyed plectrum
  13. banned for believing DNA is the answer of everithing in universe ... and forgetting it's 42 ... xDr
  14. it's possible not to ? dohhhhh ! tubm is tubm
  15. tehy might found the work done there usefull in 875 458 698 generations ... *sick*
  16. yes due to heavy boredom wich has nothing to due with procrastralalalala ; )
  17. 675: yelling in' that the earth is a square not a sphere ; )
  18. you can either keep on reading thing like an individual that live 0 to 130 years and never understand the mutligenarationalintra&inter species you miss, or read thing like someone who live 0 3000 years (random number as exemple). if i was an individual molecule like h20 and want to write something in the rock i ll probably ask other molecule to help me doing so upon a few generations ... even if it took a long time and most of us end probably recombined when the work is done ... (merge with previous picture tks) <= this is pretty much a metaphor for multigenerational/intra/inter layers of reading as exemple for species adjustement // there environnement @ long time scale wich do not exclude at all mitosis from one generation to the direct next one ... (also notice that being so much entitled in the 0 130 approach of thing is just boring to me and tend to make me giggles a lot, especially when so called scientist are stuck in this selfish time egotist time loop ... just sayin') Edit 1: code is a language someone is unable to interpret or read due to a restricitive & limitative approach at some point. (Like for exemple time & "n" dimensionnal approach related) via Imgflip Meme Maker *shrug* i kinda feel hungry and thirsty right now *nevermind* i'll probably find something that fit what i need with the next re-generation; ) Edit 3: via Imgflip Meme Maker notice that it cannot be related to the fact that we don't speak at the same speed(s) and do not use the same "layers" and """translocated "n" dimensionnal""" lifespans & process ... that's also why abstracting thoose links while considering DNA tend to now be 101% silly to make further progress ... wich is equal to: if you want to understand DNA better link it to smaller and bigger thing @ different scale related (size/time/other languages >chem,phy,neuro,elec,magnet,etc.<) etc. etc. etc. => https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feedback <=
×
×
  • Create New...