NFUN

Unplanned? Did they have any expectation it wouldn't explode?

You can't burn only lox. That's like trying to start a fire with lots of air but no fuel

Then you have once again created a supernatural situation completely divorced from reality without enough details to make any kind of actual prediction. The question "What if magic is real?" could be answered with "then Harry Potter" or "then Lord of the Rings" with equal reasonableness, and the de facto solution depends if you're Rowling or Tolkien Create the world you want to build, then come up with the justifications. You don't have the background to do it the other way around

https://youtube.com/clip/UgkxBCY7U53ZMPz_5GG79Dzg2RcMYZkWVoVh?si=U7SVCH09dTmG7uAS

A wrinkle or a snag? The former I bet you can iron out, but if the snag causes a tear that'd be problrmatic I hate Collins Aerospace with a burning passion so I'm selfishly OK with this news

that's quite an invisible wall of text

They lack information, sure, but people who will likely fly on 737s definitely have skin in the game dude...

Do fermions mediate pairing of bosons?

so predictable a complete 3rd party could see this coming

An engineer stops not when there's nothing left to add, but when there's nothing left to take away

and plenty of generally informed people wouldn't have gotten the memo that it's not on youtube anymore, guaranteeing that many flock to the scam feeds masquerading as something official because there is no official feed to be found

It's almost certain that the fit will be made worse by adding a third data point. Not worth

this is proof that raptors are unreliable and ipso facto full duration burns are neccesary and like such as period comma

rain for the next two weeks...

Always has been

please stop baiting to this get thread locked

where is the turbo?

They've already had to disable most of the equipment because if power concerns. I'm sure they've got memory to spare

those by definition have no event horizons...

Multiple sources give 235km for the apogee and -50km for the perigee, so 7677m/s at apogee for the ship. The 7763m/s total velocity given for a circular orbit is is only 1% off this value. That could be just round off error or it could be you don't literally want a test vehicle to achieve orbit to allow for a planned deorbit at a specific region

and ignore all of the people that reply as well?

oh my goooooooood