data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c581/1c58198490e263bd696eb175cd631c83d5132c95" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a190e/a190e8aea5bb0c4f9e043819acb48180b812b021" alt=""
Argelle
Members-
Posts
30 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Reputation
1 NeutralProfile Information
-
About me
Bottle Rocketeer
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
[KSP 1.6.1] Stock Visual Terrain [v2.2.0] [20 March 2019]
Argelle replied to Galileo's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Dammit, my english is not good enough for nuances, I wrongly thought scaterrer should be installed, as SVE state in the first page : I guess that's why SVE replaced files into scatterer and EVE folders when I installed it ! Note that I did not get any visible bug or crash (I install Scaterrer, then EVE, then finally SVE).- 1,019 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- kopernicus
- svt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
This may sound a silly question, but I'm only starting a carreer mode game (and dreaming of a extra-Kerbinial base) : The "stock" in your title (Stock Base Ideas), does it refer to "stock" pieces? (translaton : may I built one day a base without specific mod) How do you "clic" the "rooms" in your base? Is is docking port? Would you post pics of your current base (to get me dreaming)?
-
[1.3.0] Kerbal Engineer Redux 1.1.3.0 (2017-05-28)
Argelle replied to cybutek's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Sorry if it's the wrong topic, but my research come with too much info on TWR max I understand TWR for stage 6 to be thrust (4 x 250 kN) divided by masse (50 795 kg) and g (9.81 m/s²), and that's fine it gives 2.0088. I thought TWR max is when the first 4 BACC are empty : TWR max = 4 x 250 kN / 20095 kg * 9.81 m/s² = 5.075 But KER displays 3.89 Where am I calculating wrongly? The 4 BACCs do not contain 30700 fuel? (50 795 - 30700 = 20095) ? Rocket is higher at the end, and gravity lower ? -
[KSP 1.6.1] Stock Visual Terrain [v2.2.0] [20 March 2019]
Argelle replied to Galileo's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Follow up on this subject : I was thinking on using SVT (after running succefully Scaterrer, EVE and SVE). Since SVT needs KOPERNICUS it's safe to assume the all five work nicely together, yes?- 1,019 replies
-
- kopernicus
- svt
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Crash due to EVE or F12 ?
Argelle replied to Argelle's topic in KSP1 Technical Support (PC, modded installs)
Thanks for the tip, I'll go and reinstall EVE then Note : if admin fly by here, I have trouble editing my first post... (Kerbal is not 1.2 version but 1.2.1.1604). When I do I get "502 Bad Gateway nginx/1.10.1" (but editing this post is ok) -
KSP: 1.2 Windows 64bit Problem: crash on runway Mods installed: Chatterer 0.9.91 KER 1.1.2.6 EVE 1.2.2 Graphotron0.4.1 Precise Node 1.2.4 Reproduction steps: Hello, I had crashes with Precise Node, Chatterer, KER, Graphotron, Scatterer, SVE and EVE mods. I got rid of all, and perform a complet clean install. Resume play with Precise Node, Chatterer, KER, Graphotron => no problem for 5 days. add EVE => crah on runway. But I did also press F12 and now read that may cause problem (even if it's for large vessels ?). can you tell for the crah folder <= http://dl.free.fr/kMWbDVMhb were the crah came from? Log:
-
[1.3.0] Kerbal Engineer Redux 1.1.3.0 (2017-05-28)
Argelle replied to cybutek's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Thanks a lot, I would not have find this by myself! A change from 330 to 430 makes wonder. -
[1.3.0] Kerbal Engineer Redux 1.1.3.0 (2017-05-28)
Argelle replied to cybutek's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Hello, I,'ve got an easy question (but hey, noob spoted!) : how do I move the left bottom windows (ressources, vessel..)? My guess they are from KES, but I cannot find a way (while at launch pad, it's fine, I can do it). EDIT : forgot to mention, I only have 4 mods KSP: 1.2.1 Chatterer - 0.9.91.1586 Kerbal Engineer Redux - 1.1.2 KSP-AVC Plugin - 1.1.6.2 Stock Visual Enhancements - 1.1.4 -
Yes, a very usefull tutorial. Thanks for helping me understand the lab!
-
[0.25] RasterPropMonitor - putting the A in your IVA (v0.18.3) [8 Oct]
Argelle replied to Mihara's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
Something like, orbit velocity 72 m/s (reference = center of Minmus) but 20 m/s (relative to the surface) because Minus is rotating at say, 52 ms (white arrow)? -
[0.25] RasterPropMonitor - putting the A in your IVA (v0.18.3) [8 Oct]
Argelle replied to Mihara's topic in KSP1 Mod Releases
While landing for the first time on Minmus, I noticed some discrepencies between the horizontal speed given by RPM (left) and the one from Ingeneer (right). A crude estimate while looking at the landing by the external view is that engenieer is a better estimate, but why the difference? A crude estimate while looking at the landing by the external view is that kerbal engenieer redux is a better estimate, but why the difference? -
Thanks for the info. I did wait for 4 minutes before giving up (windows console report KSP.exe not responding) but I'll try again. Is the very very long loading time only on the first run, or is it still long when caching is done? EDIT: first run with 2-5 aggressive is up to 7'37 loading time, but reduce memory usage to 1.6 Go !! Run two : 2'03 (= close to 1'49 w/o active memory ) and still memory use 1.6 Go +++ yahoo +++ Concistant with KSP usage w/o Active Memory : 2.11 Go (1.6 Go + 415 Mo saved)