Sakata

So I've been wondering -- with the wings, what is the root part? The base, or the leading edge of the wing? I've always had a hard time getting wings to stay as stable and solid.

SAS reset mod has AVC confused. Thinks it's for KSP 1.0.0 Figure I'd warn you before someone flips their lid :

any chance you guys could look into adding ckan support and stuffing this in the repository??

Threading is also a damned headache when it comes to coding. The biggest things I can see for 64bit are addressing the 3G barrier that is the bane of all modding, and actually using the x64 processor to its full potential, speeding up the game. Heck i'd imagine that they're having to use some silly hacks to get calculations done right due to x86. Also the OS will like it more 'cause then no visualization.

Frankly it shoudln't even hit 1.0 until the leaks are fixed. 1.0 means stable, which ksp right now is not

So many pages, or I'd dig through. Does anyone have a guide on how to run ATM *with* half-res textures? Google turns up a bunch of nada. The memory leak in .9 is so bad it keeps me from playing quite effectively. I've started thinking of reverting to .25 until they release .91 (or someone comes up with a patch to fix it) or if unity can get x64 stable and ksp gets updated. Only other option I can think of is squeezing some space out of another drive and installing a small linux partition, but I'm not even sure if that will work 'cause I hear there are issues with linux x64 too

I second this. It would make it so that we could run an initial pass on the game at the least, and then it wouldn't take a full day of texture compressing to get it to work when we re-install/update.

WOW. openGL rocks. Just hope the performance isn't crap! Mine is mostly CPU-bound so physics is probably worse for me than gfx. 1.248<MM>1.619 (MM seems to take a chunk of memory) 1.714 at loading screen, @KSC 1773, with normal textures. Not a HUGE saving, like some report, but still quite considerable considering I upped the textures. [edit] actually after a bit of playing, I think its FASTER than DX mode... for me at least. Probably less memory/disk operations. I'm still on ddr2/800 ram and an old core2duo

Ahh that was my next question. Seems that setting the res in-game helps on memory as well, but made the situation with buttons and such much worse. Not sure why but seems that .25 has much worse memory load, so my game crashes after a few ships are loaded / some arbitrary time has passed. Seems that the in-game texture quality sames a lot of RAM but makes the game look like dirt. Getting quite irritating, and wish there was some way to save some more RAM. Wish x64 wasn't a pile of steamy poo At half-res in settings, I get: 1.567 pre MM, 1.891 after, 1.995 at loading screen, 2.063 in-game. Is there a way to get ATM to be more aggressive with normal texture size in game settings? Also, wonder why some icons are horrible but ones like KSPi icons look fine.

Hey, sarbian and dbray. Been wanting to get mechjeb's (as well as some other ones) textures to not look like dirt, is there a way to do this? There are so many posts I can't find the info. Tried google but it sends me to pages that don't even have the search query's terms in em.

The first one. Group +/- would be great. I actually would like to use this for my crane so the IR Crane-arm is a bit more stable while moving a base part. Some of these parts get really heavy

Same here. Still saying bundled firespitter and b9 itself are built for .24.2

They weigh 20 (correction, 7.75) tons. Too much weight and... it will require more props to lift that weight. I already had that thought Nevermind. I derped HARD on this one. the nukes have to be activated :| Herpaderpa

I have a slight problem. The nucclear engine doesn't seem to output quite enough power to run two of the fans at a time. I made a ship with 4 props and two reactors, and it runs out of electric charge in no time flat. Am I doing something wrong or should I just mod the config to give the nuke a bit more oomph?

Hey, one thing I'd really like to see. Is there a way to add a actiongroup button to change strut grouping?