Bloody_looser

Due to lack of options I voted 'No'. If the poll had 'Kinda yes \ Kinda no' options, it would be 'Kinda yes'. I've been playing since like 0.20. Back in that times I saw the game and thought "Oh, that's cool and stuff". Watched some videos, saw screenshots. I bought KSP not for some potential or promised features, I simply liked it. I've tried several mods, but currently play full stock. Stock game was greatly improved while I've been playing it. The main issue with the stock for me is atmosphere lacking, well "the atmos". But it's being redone. Also, re-entry heating would be really nice to implement. But if not - I won't have raging butthurt and won't cry all over the forums for refund. Refund guys, you're an embarrassment. About bugs. I can talk only about my personal experience. Since 0.90 release I've been playing a lot. And before release too, due to the hype. And I didn't have a single crash. Maybe I'm lucky, but the game runs much more smoothly than it was in like 0.23. As for me, stock game has few critical bugs - grabber unit phantom forces and decoupler issues. I haven't seen the NaN Kraken for several months. *knocks on wood* Minor bugs - EVA jettisoning, ladder sliding, external seats problems are a bit annoying, but not utterly game-braking. Also, bugfixing is announced. So, aside from atmospheric model there are no utterly broken game features. Except strategies of course Trough I have a feeling some 0.99 release would be useful, the game is really near "the completion".

So, re-entry at 90 degrees and 15 km/s will still be possible That ain't nice.

Aerodynamics overhaul, time warp redone, fairings etc. are not "big" enough features? My comment regards the whole thread, not just the OP, and memory issues are frequently mentioned in it.

Really enjoyed reading this "civilized" discussion. Look like classic post-hype butthurt thread (e.g. around destructible buildings). Squad announces "super-duper secret feature". Everyone like - whoa aerodynamics, gas planets, radiation, launchpads etc. Feature turns out to be minor, but cool. And there we go - riots all over the forum. Arguments about memory issues are ridiculous. One more model (or texture) won't explode your RAM. And I don't remember raging protests against Mk2\Mk3 overhaul. Would comment on various posters' allusions about name Valentina, but this would get me banned for sure.

Or kick it off gently with another vessel. It' s much more kerbal

Start a new game. Recent changes were big enough to be save-braking.

It's the worst suggestion about girbals i've heard.

Reps away

Tested the save. Well, the rover roves. Since I'm playing full stock, it's the mods to blame.

Use x32, x64 is completely broken now.

And what controls do you use for rovers?

Yep, it drives. Also, flips over on braking

Yep, that's it. Xp values need some tweaking, that's for sure. I thought that for non-atmospheric bodies sub-orbital will count as "flight". Though, after some hyperedi further experiments, it looks like flight xp is only available on atmospheric bodies. Fly-by situation for Kerbin is also impossible. So, I've fixed the table. In Astronaut complex Minmus landing\flag planting values appear as integer six. In logs fractional part appears - readings are 5.75 and 6.25 respectively. Also, it is seen through skill progress bar. So, flag planting is somewhat helpful, but for Kerbin moons the difference is tiny.

Here you go, KXP table. Amount of xp seems to be based on distance from Kerbin and IMHO is quite arbitrary. [table=width: 500, class: grid] [tr] [td][/td] [td] Fly by[/td] [td]Orbit[/td] [td]Flight[/td] [td]Land[/td] [td]Flag[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Kerbol[/td] [td]0[/td] [td]6[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]-[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Moho[/td] [td]7[/td] [td]11[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]16[/td] [td]18[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Eve[/td] [td]5[/td] [td]8[/td] [td]10[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]13[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Gilly[/td] [td]6[/td] [td]9[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]14[/td] [td]15[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Kerbin[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]2[/td] [td]1[/td] [td]0[/td] [td]0[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td] Mun[/td] [td]2[/td] [td]3[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]5[/td] [td]5[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Minmus[/td] [td]3[/td] [td]4[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]6[/td] [td]6[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td] Duna[/td] [td]5[/td] [td]8[/td] [td]10[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]13[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Ike[/td] [td]5[/td] [td]8[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]13[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td] Dres[/td] [td]6[/td] [td]9[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]14[/td] [td]15[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td] Jool[/td] [td]6[/td] [td]9[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]-[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Laythe[/td] [td]8[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]16[/td] [td]18[/td] [td]20[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Vall[/td] [td]8[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]18[/td] [td]20[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td] Tylo[/td] [td]8[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]18[/td] [td]20[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td] Bop[/td] [td]8[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]18[/td] [td]20[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Pol[/td] [td]8[/td] [td]12[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]18[/td] [td]20[/td] [/tr] [tr] [td]Eeloo[/td] [td]10[/td] [td]15[/td] [td]-[/td] [td]23[/td] [td]25[/td] [/tr] [/table]

I'll give rep to all posters of the first page. And tenth. And... Because why not post in this thread?

This. Accepted contracts icons in Tracking station on mouse-over have green text, while offered appear in orange.

I've built a base on Minmus. Assembled it in orbit and landed in one piece - true kerbal style. Now I can do contracts and science and stuff

5 xp. Yep, it only counts for the guy, who planted the flag.

Actually, engineers gain ability to repair wheels at level 2.

That's kind of SSTO madness I approve. Shuttles are way too boring. Can some of these go interplanetary?

I understand your sufferings from stock crafts infesting your sandbox. To get rid of them change value in the persistent.sfs "AllowStockVessels = " from True to False. Enjoy:wink:

Same there. And now all my favourite ships are getting QBE clipped gizmoed into cockpit

Bill crashlanded on the Mun, otherwise all three are fine so far.

Nah, I rolled it back:D New pilot skill, especially holding prograde\retrograde, tends to drain electricity way too quickly.

Old-school flying without maneuver nodes feels good