Jump to content

Squadcast Summary 2015-03-20 - Squadcast is back! IVA's, April Fools, and Questions


basic.syntax

Recommended Posts

Squad should give themselves a pat in the back for being nice enough to tolerate all of your rants, flamewars and protests for a simple prank.

Get over it, guys. You should be grateful for Squad's tolerance. We're only lucky that KSP isn't run by an aggressive company which barely cares about it's community, because now that's considered common.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Squad should give themselves a pat in the back for being nice enough to tolerate all of your rants, flamewars and protests for a simple prank. Get over it, guys. You should be grateful for Squad's tolerance. We're only lucky that KSP isn't run by an aggressive company which barely cares about it's community, because now that's considered common.
But, it wasn't a simple prank. It was an extraordinarily detailed one, with some elements based on community requests (automatic cross-posting of squad info made in other media.) I fell for it. I didn't expect ALL the elements would happen, plans change with feedback - and the feedback was ferocious. The furor only calmed down once it was made clear that it WAS a prank, and no such thing was going to happen.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Squad should give themselves a pat in the back for being nice enough to tolerate all of your rants, flamewars and protests for a simple prank.

Get over it, guys. You should be grateful for Squad's tolerance. We're only lucky that KSP isn't run by an aggressive company which barely cares about it's community, because now that's considered common.

What's it say about the current state of things that the community didn't immediately say "Squad would never do anything like this. I smell something fishy."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What's it say about the current state of things that the community didn't immediately say "Squad would never do anything like this. I smell something fishy."

That they are quite displeased with the direction that squad had been heading?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That we're once bitten, twice shy? I haven't forgotten that Squad claimed they were working on a new site for mods, only to then abruptly announce that actually they're outsourcing the mod hosting to a third party with a bad reputation among many gamers.

And Squad were already talking about a new forum, and while I think they've denied they'll be outsourcing the forum in the same way, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if they did after all. Was Kasper's post so absurd as to be unbelievable? Possibly. Were certain aspects things I could see Insert New Forum Host Here doing? Absolutely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was Kasper's post so absurd as to be unbelievable? Possibly. Were certain aspects things I could see Insert New Forum Host Here doing? Absolutely.

I would say it was absolutely too absurd to be believable. Tweet-to-post? New 140 character limit? Walt Kerman a.k.a. "Clippy"?

I think maybe some people around here are just too on-edge. I can understand frustration with some of Squad's decisions, but it has to be exhausting to be so pessimistic about everything they do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I keep hearing this and that about memory leaks. What do you guys mean by that?

The game requests memory without telling the OS that it does no longer need it afterwards in some areas of the game. So the OS thinks the memory is still in use and will not allocate it to either the game itself or any other program. This eats up the available RAM and results in an out-of-memory crash of the game - which frees up the RAM like a normal restart would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A memory leak, which sounds like something is losing memory - kind of means the opposite. It happens when a piece of code allocates or reserves a section of memory to do something, but doesn't return that memory to the place it came from, after it's done. It can be a very small amount, escaping notice in the short term. The next time that piece of code gets run, it allocates or reserves a new section of memory, causing KSP's overall memory consumption to increase. Leaks are plugged by carefully going over the code, understanding what it does and how long it should need to hold onto something - to make sure each code routine frees the memory it reserved, each time it has finished running.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Squad should give themselves a pat in the back for being nice enough to tolerate all of your rants, flamewars and protests for a simple prank.

Get over it, guys. You should be grateful for Squad's tolerance. We're only lucky that KSP isn't run by an aggressive company which barely cares about it's community, because now that's considered common.

Yeah, this. Seriously, you'd think some people here were, like, major shareholders in the company or something from the way they insist that they know the correct way Squad should conduct their business.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... the OS thinks the memory is still in use and will not allocate it to either the game itself or any other program.

Physical RAM is an implementation detail that is (largely) irrelevant these days - certainly with respect to other programs. Each program gets its own virtual memory space to fill up as it sees fit and out-of-memory means that this program's virtual memory is full. Other programs will continue to allocate/deallocate memory themselves.

It's then up to the OS to try to maintain the illusion that, however much virtual memory each application has allocated, it's all backed up by physical memory. As this illusion breaks down, you'll start to notice thrashing (as pages are continuously moved between physical ram and the page file) as the amount of memory in active use exceeds what's physically available, but this is unrelated to any "out of memory" situation and the OS will still allow applications to allocate more virtual memory if they ask for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If only they could answer what will happen to the old chase camera mode... If it is entirely removed and replaced with the new chase cam then that is game breadking for me.. Impossible to get proper first person perspective without old chase cam.

Edited by boxman
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"What's it say about the current state of things that the community didn't immediately say "Squad would never do anything like this. I smell something fishy.""

That we're a weirdly hypercritical humorless lot who don't deal well with jokes or change?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...