Add a "[FAR]" prefix option to the Spacecraft Exchange subforum.

[windows_x_seven]

My suggestion is quite simple, actually.

I think it would be easier to find FAR-compatible crafts by looking at a [FAR] prefix or searching for that prefix than downloading the ones that I suspect that might work, only to find out that 90% of those don't.

Simple, no?

Edited June 8, 2015 by windows_x_seven
totally not biased poll

[Hobbes Novakoff]

Biased poll much? You didn't even put in "No." Also, this belongs in Kerbal Network.

[Robotengineer]

I voted for all three, but what's really simple is to just put [FAR] after the [sTOCK] in the title.

[Ethanadams]

why isnt there a no?

[windows_x_seven]

why isnt there a no?

There is, but it's using a cloaking device.

[technicalfool]

Small problem: Whatever your opinion of FAR, it's only one of many mods.

Should there also be a [bDArmory] tag? [b9]? [KW]? [RSS]?

[Mechjeb]?

Suggest you, and others, take a look at the tagging function. It's a rarely-used forum function that does exactly what you'd like: Makes it easy to search for stuff with certain tags. The advantage is, you can entirely make your own tags up, and it doesn't have to wait for a forum admin to add it.

[Joshwoo70]

Small problem: Whatever your opinion of FAR, it's only one of many mods.

Should there also be a [bDArmory] tag? [b9]? [KW]? [RSS]?

[Mechjeb]?

Oh no more mechjeb!

On topic : technicalfool yes i can imagine the horr- stress the mods have to go through...