Jump to content

Starship Enterprise (TNG version) - landable on Earth?


wossname

Recommended Posts

I remember seeing either a Star Trek episode or movie where the TNG version of the Enterprise landed on a planet under emergency conditions.

Given the huge saucer section and the flat belly on the rear portion (plus the warp nacelles) might provide a decent amount of lift, would the weight/lift/drag/thrust distributions make it remotely feasible to land this craft on a planet similar to Earth?

I'm just interested in the throught experiment this might lead to. My mind seems to entertain the notion that aero forces would permit some sort of emergency landing / crash landing without wiping out the entire crew (ignoring the "red-shirts" of course).

Is it assumable that impulse power is NOT enough to levitate the enterprise? I'm not sure if that was a pre-requisite of the design of the wessel.

Edited by wossname
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The USS Enterprise, NCC-1701 D never landed on any planet. Maybe it did in a fan made flic but not in any official episode or movie. However in the saucer section was designed to crash land in an emergency as it did in StarTrek 7, Generations.

USS Voyager, NCC-74656 is a lot smaller and can land.

Edited by Tex_NL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you talking about this scene? It was in the movie, "Generations," not the TNG television series. And it was ONLY the saucer section that landed after jettisoning everything else. The ship wasn't recoverable after this.

Would it be possible? The shape of the saucer doesn't look sufficient enough to generate lift, but then, neither was the space shuttle, really. A more apt description comes from Toy Story. "That's not flying, it's falling with style." A lot of this also depends on the density of the atmosphere.

Edited by vger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Presumably given some time and some extraordinarily careful piloting you could probably land the Enterprise-D. However, in order to do it without completely wrecking the ship you'd have to design something for it to land on that will be able to support the weight and not damage the ship at the same time.

The real issue is why you would want to land it outside of an emergency. I could probably see it being something along the lines of how the Shuttles went (IE, museum pieces) but given the vast and super easy access to space that the people in the Trek universe have, it'd still be a better idea to have it as an orbiting museum. (Which I believe actually is a thing for the older ships in the Trek-verse)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, it has no landing legs, sooo...

How could it land?

Intrepid class ships did apparently have landing struts, according to the interwebs. No idea what class the TNG Enterprise was though. And I'm frankly too lazy to look it up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Intrepid class ships did apparently have landing struts, according to the interwebs. No idea what class the TNG Enterprise was though. And I'm frankly too lazy to look it up.

It was "Galaxy" class. And seriously - Starfleed ships have access to ludicrous amounts of juice. I reckon that if you have ship capable of going FTL at the snap of the fingers, can generate forcefields all day long and fire mountain-smashing energy blasts, you can do pretty much anything you want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real issue is why you would want to land it outside of an emergency. I could probably see it being something along the lines of how the Shuttles went (IE' date=' museum pieces) but given the vast and super easy access to space that the people in the Trek universe have, it'd still be a better idea to have it as an orbiting museum. (Which I believe actually is a thing for the older ships in the Trek-verse)[/quote']

Admittedly it's a pretty silly question anyhow. It's like asking if an aircraft carrier can land on the beach. Yeah, technically it can, but why would you want to. You've got transporters and shuttles to ferry people and supplies around. Why waste energy and risk destruction by landing something that massive?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it assumable that impulse power is NOT enough to levitate the enterprise?

If I remember correctly, there's some sort of regulation in the Star Trek universe limiting the speed achieved by impulse power to 1/4 the speed of light. Any engine able to accelerate a ship to that kind of speed in any reasonable amount of time would have no problem lifting off the surface of a planet (or a star, for that matter).

Edited by Vaporo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Impulse engines are fusion thrusters, might that not impact their performance in atmosphere? Intrepid class ships can land on planets (shown at least once in Voyager), though the that Enterprise is a Galaxy class, which is a lot bigger.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Voyager (known to be the prettiest ship in all the Universe and everywhere else) uses antigravity generators and impulse lifters for atmospheric operation and planetary landings, according to Memory Alpha.

Vaporo, you are onto something.

From http://memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/Impulse_drive

The 'Star Trek Voyager Technical Manual' page 13 has full impulse listed as ¼ of the speed of light which is 167,000,000 mph or 74,770 km/s.

However, anything that can repeatedly and effortlessly accelerate itself to 1/4 c and stop is a monster that should have no problems generating enough energy to land on any planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure. We can all agree a ship that can do 1/4c with ease has more than enough power. The inertial dampers all Federation ships are equipped with stop the ship from being ripped apart during acceleration and deceleration. But does it have the structural integrity to survive the atmosphere? And won't the saucer simply snap off after it has touched down? That big dish must weigh megatons.

Edited by Tex_NL
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't remember TNG too well, but I do recall this:

- In one episode, they detached the "saucer section" and attempted an emergency crash-landing. The crew survived, but I don't think the ship did.

- In the remakes (yes I know it's not TNG, but still), impulse drive was enough to lift the ship vertically.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However, anything that can repeatedly and effortlessly accelerate itself to 1/4 c and stop is a monster that should have no problems generating enough energy to land on any planet.

That all depends. You could do that with ion drives, but you wouldn't want to use it to land. :P

Max speed and max power are entirely different things. A street racer is as fast as all heck, but you couldn't use it as a towing vehicle and expect good results.

Edited by vger
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I put the "effortlessly" in there.

I don't remember ever noticing Star Trek ships undergoing a process of acceleration (expect in Voyager when they try that warp 10 thing). They accelerate instantaneously, or as good as.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...