GoldenGonzo Posted April 27, 2016 Share Posted April 27, 2016 (edited) 287 hours into Kerbal Space Program and I'm doing my 3rd ever satellite mission, this one in a solar orbit. I see it requires a "materials bay" (word for word), so that's a service bay right? After all, it's the only bay in the game, that you put materials in. What else would it be? There is no part called a "materials bay". I almost complete mission, all the way in a solar orbit but "have materials bay on satellite" is not ticked. What the heck? This sucks, so I revert to assembly, and think "does it mean the 2.5meter service bay? I'm not taking the risk of wasting my time again so I google it. That's when I see, by the "materials bay", they mean the Science Jr. It's an easy mistake to make, too easy. Even 300 hours in I made it. I'm not the only one either: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/index.php?/topic/95693-where-do-i-find-a-quotmaterials-bayquot/ https://steamcommunity.com/app/220200/discussions/0/627457521160596676/ https://steamcommunity.com/app/220200/discussions/0/618458030684292882/ All I am suggesting is that one of two very small, very minor, very easy changes be made. Both would solve a lot of confusion. Either add "Materials Bay" to the [SC-9001 Science Jr] name, for example, [SC-9001 Science Jr. Materials Bay], or alternatively, change each and every instance of "Materials Bay" in contracts to the proper name of the part, the [SC-9001 Science Jr]. I think this change is a no brainer. Happy rocketeering everyone! Edited April 27, 2016 by GoldenGonzo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wjolcz Posted April 28, 2016 Share Posted April 28, 2016 I really don't like the Materials Science bay, or whatever it's called. It's too big and I feel like it's in the game just to get science points. I want to perform real experiments, not grind through the tree. IMO the game would be better off without the science points and the tech tree we have now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THX1138 Posted June 13, 2016 Share Posted June 13, 2016 I also had this problem a long time ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snark Posted June 14, 2016 Share Posted June 14, 2016 Not just a problem with this particular part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now