EmDrive Builder will Answer Questions

[kerbiloid]

A transgoogled article about the preprint

https://translate.google.ru/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=ru&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgeektimes.ru%2Fpost%2F282304%2F&edit-text=

[shynung]

Was there anything energetic detected going the opposite direction from the thrust? Particles, EM waves?

[Rakaydos]

What theories have been definitively ruled out, as far as the underlyng physics?

I'm in the "Low Vaccuum MHD Thruster" camp, but I saw a wacky idea that called for a "Plank length" for momentum, and the EM drive is literally running on universal rounding error.

[Nuke]

43 minutes ago, Rakaydos said:

What theories have been definitively ruled out, as far as the underlyng physics?

I'm in the "Low Vaccuum MHD Thruster" camp, but I saw a wacky idea that called for a "Plank length" for momentum, and the EM drive is literally running on universal rounding error.

haxxxor the universe!

[rfmwguy]

8 hours ago, shynung said:

Was there anything energetic detected going the opposite direction from the thrust? Particles, EM waves?

Nothing I could point to as an answer. H fields were stable, same with E fields. Did not get the chance to monitor Cu++ at the time. Still debate whether it's particle or wave or something else entirely.

4 hours ago, Rakaydos said:

What theories have been definitively ruled out, as far as the underlyng physics?

I'm in the "Low Vaccuum MHD Thruster" camp, but I saw a wacky idea that called for a "Plank length" for momentum, and the EM drive is literally running on universal rounding error.

Planck theories are interesting but remain suspect. All I ruled out was thermal air movement, or lift when I went from teeter totter to Cavendish torsion beam. Displacement was too rapid for center of gravity change due to heating. 1/8 in copper cavity absorbs and radiates heat very slowly.