Grease1991 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 1 hour ago, flywlyx said: OLS could extend to 10KM now, adjust the size with tweakable scale will affect the distance, I am still testing it. Display the degree is a good idea, or have a color/visual indicator to help identify which range you are in. It seems that the OLS Range is tied to the actual scale of the object, as i only get about 2.5 km out of it now (which would match up sense i made the MM file to scale it down to 25 percent of the original size to fit on the Heisenberg runway pieces) would it be possible to have those two elements (physical size and range) separate from each other as far as tweakscale is concerned, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flywlyx Posted July 20, 2017 Author Share Posted July 20, 2017 2 hours ago, Grease1991 said: It seems that the OLS Range is tied to the actual scale of the object, as i only get about 2.5 km out of it now (which would match up sense i made the MM file to scale it down to 25 percent of the original size to fit on the Heisenberg runway pieces) would it be possible to have those two elements (physical size and range) separate from each other as far as tweakscale is concerned, Right click the runway light(which is the body of OLS), you should be able to enlarge and toggle it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 2 hours ago, flywlyx said: Right click the runway light(which is the body of OLS), you should be able to enlarge and toggle it. I should have clarified that i have moved the slider to 10 in the editor, but since i have it scaled down due to the size of the runway size, and it only shows up 2.5 km away from the carrier, again which makes sense cause 2.5 km is a quarter of the size of the original, and that what i reduced it by, but the actual part for the OLS should have a Scale/Size to it that is different than the starting range of the guidance element. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flywlyx Posted July 20, 2017 Author Share Posted July 20, 2017 7 minutes ago, Grease1991 said: I should have clarified that i have moved the slider to 10 in the editor, but since i have it scaled down due to the size of the runway size, and it only shows up 2.5 km away from the carrier, again which makes sense cause 2.5 km is a quarter of the size of the original, and that what i reduced it by, but the actual part for the OLS should have a Scale/Size to it that is different than the starting range of the guidance element. It is cheaper to make it this way, Calculating the distance of all loaded vessel is going to cost a lot more resource. Maybe I should tie it to the activated vessel to provide a better performance at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 1 minute ago, flywlyx said: It is cheaper to make it this way, Calculating the distance of all loaded vessel is going to cost a lot more resource. Maybe I should tie it to the activated vessel to provide a better performance at this point. that would be cool too, maybe like a mech-jeb like module that compares it's distance to the OLS on your carrier, or something like that, that way you don't have to worry about non-carrier craft. if you did go the extra part route, maybe allow it to set waypoints to the carrier you want to land at? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flywlyx Posted July 20, 2017 Author Share Posted July 20, 2017 7 minutes ago, Grease1991 said: that would be cool too, maybe like a mech-jeb like module that compares it's distance to the OLS on your carrier, or something like that, that way you don't have to worry about non-carrier craft. if you did go the extra part route, maybe allow it to set waypoints to the carrier you want to land at? Like only plane with tail hook can trigger the OLS? That sounds good to me. Since there is no need for a VTOL to take care of the OLS, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 12 minutes ago, flywlyx said: Like only plane with tail hook can trigger the OLS? That sounds good to me. Since there is no need for a VTOL to take care of the OLS, right? yeah that actually makes more sense then my idea, cause the only crafts that really need the ols are like you said the ones aiming for the wires Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 20, 2017 Share Posted July 20, 2017 oh and if there is a way to support the AGL landing gear that would be awesome to as those do not function with the catapult Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 21, 2017 Share Posted July 21, 2017 (edited) So after a bit of poking around a looking at the souce code for the catapult it seems like the reason it does not accept the Adjustable Landing Gear and others like the B9 Gear from the B9 aerospace legacy pack is because the catapult only looks for the stock modulewheelbase, and ALG and B9 gear use KSPwheelBase, so if there is a chance that could be added to the code that would be awesome cause i don't ever use the stock landing gear. Edit: I see this is already a issue sorry about that. Edited July 23, 2017 by Grease1991 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giancarlo Kerman Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I don't know why but the only part i have is the Enterprise and i'm missing the other parts like the catapult, arresting cable etc... any clue why??? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Giancarlo Kerman Posted July 23, 2017 Share Posted July 23, 2017 I am having a problem using this mod cause all i can find is the Enterprise pod and no other parts from this mod please help soon, i want to use this to its fullest Asap Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XOC2008 Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 @flywlyx What is the 'force ratio' and 'cable preload' on the tiedown parts? (What does it do?) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flywlyx Posted July 24, 2017 Author Share Posted July 24, 2017 3 hours ago, XOC2008 said: @flywlyx What is the 'force ratio' and 'cable preload' on the tiedown parts? (What does it do?) Force ratio is not valid at this moment, cable preload is how much force the cable is going to pull your vessel. 23 hours ago, Giancarlo Kerman said: I am having a problem using this mod cause all i can find is the Enterprise pod and no other parts from this mod please help soon, i want to use this to its fullest Asap Check if you could use the .craft file, if not, it is highly possible you install the folder in the wrong location, KFC should under gamedata folder. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XOC2008 Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 Just now, flywlyx said: Force ratio is not valid at this moment, cable preload is how much force the cable is going to pull your vessel. Okay so that's what I figured but I wanted to be sure. Thanks! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flywlyx Posted July 24, 2017 Author Share Posted July 24, 2017 4 minutes ago, XOC2008 said: Okay so that's what I figured but I wanted to be sure. Thanks! You are welcome, the force ratio is going to change to cable preload soonTM, I will update a function for tiedown to link to any vessel(doesn't have fixedpoint). Does this sounds good to you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XOC2008 Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 1 minute ago, flywlyx said: You are welcome, the force ratio is going to change to cable preload soonTM, I will update a function for tiedown to link to any vessel(doesn't have fixedpoint). Does this sounds good to you? I don't mind having the fixed point parts personally. But I guess having that extra function without adding parts on all the time will be nice too. SM Marine LCAC, SM AFVs Humvee, and Aircraft Carrier Accessories Tiedowns: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 24, 2017 Share Posted July 24, 2017 @flywlyx Have you and shadowmage started any talks about how to get kspwheel and this working together yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flywlyx Posted July 24, 2017 Author Share Posted July 24, 2017 14 minutes ago, Grease1991 said: @flywlyx Have you and shadowmage started any talks about how to get kspwheel and this working together yet? Not yet, I will place an issue on github later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 25, 2017 Share Posted July 25, 2017 @flywlyx what about a retractable towbar of sorts that operate just for the catapult, kinda like the tailhook, but for the catapult? the advantage of this would be that it would open of different landing gear setups instead of the standard trike that most go with, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flywlyx Posted July 26, 2017 Author Share Posted July 26, 2017 3 hours ago, Grease1991 said: @flywlyx what about a retractable towbar of sorts that operate just for the catapult, kinda like the tailhook, but for the catapult? the advantage of this would be that it would open of different landing gear setups instead of the standard trike that most go with, ALG is supported, it is not as stable as stock parts, please test and let me know your feed back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 1 minute ago, flywlyx said: ALG is supported, it is not as stable as stock parts, please test and let me know your feed back. Will do, i'm checking it out right now, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grease1991 Posted July 26, 2017 Share Posted July 26, 2017 (edited) @flywlyx The two lauches i've done so far both worked fine, the only weird thing is that it kinda joggles the front wheel around a bit right before it actually grabs it, and then with my plane that i was launching (i'll have to try a different one just to make sure) the wheel ends up being a little bit off the ground when it's grabbed by the catapult, Other than that it worked just as well as it did with the stock wheels EDIT 1: the lifting of the wheel is only on my MM file rescaled version of the catapult, it doesn't happen on the un-rescaled one. also the jerky ness is about the same as with the stock wheels, so it's just my MM patch causing those issues, Edited July 26, 2017 by Grease1991 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gomker Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 @flywlyx Tie downs are brilliant man, love the implementation. Works great for cargo planes so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EchoDriver Posted July 27, 2017 Share Posted July 27, 2017 (edited) @flywlyx I'm loading a carrier deck but when I first tried to set sail, all the aircraft were shifting. I'm a huge fan of tie downs because they certainly solved the problem. One issue though that you might not have noticed - if you tie down an aircraft, return to KSP, and then come back "in game" it seem physics easing or a collider effect was destroying aircraft every time. I finally found a work around by installing KJR, but do you know of a way to keep this from happening with out using joint reinforcement? Daytime Carrier Deck Edited July 27, 2017 by EchoDriver Album no worky Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flywlyx Posted July 27, 2017 Author Share Posted July 27, 2017 7 hours ago, EchoDriver said: @flywlyx I'm loading a carrier deck but when I first tried to set sail, all the aircraft were shifting. I'm a huge fan of tie downs because they certainly solved the problem. One issue though that you might not have noticed - if you tie down an aircraft, return to KSP, and then come back "in game" it seem physics easing or a collider effect was destroying aircraft every time. I finally found a work around by installing KJR, but do you know of a way to keep this from happening with out using joint reinforcement? Album 0wK9FmG will appear when post is submitted It works fine on my test plane(stock plane). Have you try reduce the preload to 0? Or if you can update a gif have more details about how it is destroyed? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.