Grease1991

Really just gotta release the dev stuff so modders can make the game great, KSP1 was understandable considering it was a small handful of people, but for some reason ksp2 devs have been slacking for years at this point.

I started playing KSP back at .19 i think, and have followed the devs and enjoyed the game despite bugs and kraken type issues, and that's was fine because of the fact that this was merely a small team just doing something they were passionate about, I was hyped about ksp2 back in 2019 when they announced it and was always on the side of make it right take the time to make it right, The problem is that the devs have seemly only cared about attracting people to the KSP world, with shiny graphics and tutorials, and spending time and money on making video about how much they cared, instead of fixing core issues with the game. and making a SOLID CORE to release into EA, there are super basic bugs that would have been blindingly obvious, if there was any play testing at all, that aren't even a problem in KSP 1 officially, due to the old devs fixing it, I'm not talking about FPS issues or random things that are hard to repeat, i'm talking about things as simple as making a simple 11 part Plane, be able to roll down the runway without wobbling it self to destruction. I really hope that they get their priorities straight because every ounce of faith i had in this team died on friday, and the idea of T2 taking the money they have got and running doesn't sound out of character for them, I think the people in charge tried to make KSP into an Triple A franchise and focused on the shiny bits of that and i don't think they realized what a difficult thing making KSP is, My prediction is that Modders are going to end up fixing way more and improving the game far more than the devs will, until I see something that resembles REAL progress, I'm not going to throw money back at this game, not at 50 bucks,

So I don't know how you installed them, but i used ckan, and there was a texture unlimited cfc in the pwings folder, i deleted that and i restarted and got the old textures and the ability to add the heat tiles, so you might have the same thing going on, idk, it might be that ADDITION of the b9wingunlimited.cfg that is removing the ability to use the included texture,

I know the go big or go home update still had them, I actually don't remember a version before this one (this current version) that didn't have the textures included. Hope this helps.

I've been out the ksp loop for a while now, i'm just wondering if there is an updated mod list somewhere that i'm unaware of, or is everything just gone to ckan.

@JadeOfMaar It is you and people like you that have kept this game alive for so long,

there was mention of this above, Here is the last bit of the log from my install doing the same thing, maybe that will help narrow it down (when you have time) [LOG 10:39:32.586] PartLoader: Compiling Part 'WildBlueIndustries/Heisenberg/Parts/Gondola/JumpJetModule/WBI_BisonJumpJet' [LOG 10:39:32.605] PartLoader: Part 'WildBlueIndustries/Heisenberg/Parts/Gondola/JumpJetModule/WBI_BisonJumpJet' has no database record. Creating. [LOG 10:39:32.608] PartLoader: Compiling Part 'WildBlueIndustries/Heisenberg/Parts/Gondola/PadExtension/WBI_PadExtension' [LOG 10:39:32.615] PartLoader: Part 'WildBlueIndustries/Heisenberg/Parts/Gondola/PadExtension/WBI_PadExtension' has no database record. Creating. [LOG 10:39:32.615] [DragCubeSystem]: Drag cubes not found or cannot be read for part Part. Generating New drag cubes. [LOG 10:39:32.616] DragCubeSystem: Creating drag cubes for part 'WBI.PadExtension' [LOG 10:39:32.653] PartLoader: Compiling Part 'WildBlueIndustries/Heisenberg/Parts/Gondola/PassengerGondola/WBI_PassengerGondola' [LOG 10:39:32.667] PartLoader: Part 'WildBlueIndustries/Heisenberg/Parts/Gondola/PassengerGondola/WBI_PassengerGondola' has no database record. Creating. [LOG 10:39:32.667] [DragCubeSystem]: Drag cubes not found or cannot be read for part Part. Generating New drag cubes. [LOG 10:39:32.670] DragCubeSystem: Creating drag cubes for part 'WBI.PassengerGondola' [EXC 10:39:32.733] NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object ModuleDeployablePart.AssumeDragCubePosition (System.String name) (at <c1858a3f77504bd1aaa946fdccf84670>:0) DragCubeSystem+<RenderDragCubes>d__34.MoveNext () (at <c1858a3f77504bd1aaa946fdccf84670>:0) UnityEngine.SetupCoroutine.InvokeMoveNext (System.Collections.IEnumerator enumerator, System.IntPtr returnValueAddress) (at <5aeafee3fea24f37abd1315553f2cfa6>:0) UnityEngine.DebugLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object) ModuleManager.UnityLogHandle.InterceptLogHandler:LogException(Exception, Object) UnityEngine.Debug:CallOverridenDebugHandler(Exception, Object) [LOG 10:40:25.035] Launcher here(in write): False [LOG 10:40:31.805] Launcher here(in write): False

funny enough, I legitimately thought about buying it on steam so i could do that, but i have had ksp since right before it was on steam.

super frustrating cause kopernicus disables it self in 1.4.4 and i don't know how to get 1.4.3

Shoutout to @ferram4 I haven't been it a ksp mood for a few months and really just check the forum to see how things are going, but it's nice to see that this mod is still going strong, I can't imagine how frustrating it must be to get it updated to work with the current version of ksp and then boom next one gets released. (and then THAT question pops up) Not a pry at trying to get it to 1.4 or anything like that,(as i said i haven't jumped back into playing yet) just a thx for the truly MASSIVE amount of work you throw into this. there are tons of great mods for ksp but not many have the complexity that this must have.

I can't seem to remember where i found it, but there was a guide of sorts that explain the different way tweakscale scaled a fuel tank vs a girder or something like that and came in really handy when making a tweakscale config, does anyone know where i can find that, or whether i'm just insane.

maybe a tweakscale config for a easy quick fix on that?

while I do agree with you that for the most part most planes on carriers are small, (besides the example of the c130 above) but this is KSP and unless your aiming for completely realistic, than the real world does not matter as much, so the idea of having big carriers is not that big of an issue, also the 150 is not my landing speed it's the crash tolerance in the part config, as i don't see how lightly touching the wheels to any deck at that speed would end up in explostions of any kind, it's more so a extreme that i shouldn't have to meet, also f-18 hornets land around 135 knots which is still around 70 m/s and the A-5 Vigilante was around 150 knots which is closer to 80 ms. which would mean instant explosions with the 50 m/s crash tolerance. again regardless of how light you land. the cargo plane i presented in my pic can get down to that speed but it would prefer around 80-90 ms which isn't completely insane considering it's size. and it's purpose of being a SSTO aircraft. As much as i love the f-14s i'm actually surprised now that think about it that I haven't built variable winged planes yet for any reason. I have a few designs that can land at 30 easily but the range on the OLS would still be nice if it wasn't tied to the size of the part, also why not have the ability to build carriers that fit with the stock size of the ACA part. with out a system crashing amount of parts,

thats why i've been messing around with a cfg file for tweakscale but as someone that has limited knowledge its kinda slow,

the issue i have with the OLS is that it's guide to help you land is also attached to the scale of the part so at normal scale the ability to extend it 10km works just fine but when you scale it down 25 percent you get 25 percent of 10km as well leaving you with 2.5km of guidence. i'm not sure if that would change between rescalefactor and scale but i'll try that, heres why the decks are to small for the majority of the aircraft in ksp. like your example my carrier is also primary 3 segments wide, as well as having side storage on the lower deck, but anything other than the smallest planes don't really have a place on this size of carrier.