Jump to content

Next to the moon?


McWane

Recommended Posts

Any thoughts on who's going to the moon next? I had a thought of the chinese landing next to one of the US's landing spots and tearing down the flag and wrecking all the stuff we left behind >.< I personally hope they don't do that(Plus why would they do that XD) I personally think the EU will be the next to live their footprints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That won't happen, but I could see the EU or China landing on the moon next. They obviously would avoid former landing spots. There was a controversy about the Lunar X Prize landing near it, and NASA suggested they didn't land within a certain area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder why would they ask others to avoid those sites. It would certainly put an end to all those conspiracy theories. One way or the other.

I wasn't aware that ESA had a plan to land a human on the moon in near future.

China or North Korea (NK with its Kerbalesque approach) would be my guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, I'll weigh in here.

Whilst I'm a science teacher, I am also trained in History[1]. We have a unique opportunity with the Apollo landing sites - namely, those sites will be preserved in pristine condition forever unless they are hit by a meteoroid (which is highly unlikely) or disturbed by human activities.

For that reason, I believe that it is imperative that those sites remain as undisturbed as possible. Remember that even the slightest error could compromise the integrity of the sites. Therefore before any program (national or corporate) tries to visit one of the landing sites, I'd say it is critical that they formulate a plan of how to do so without any potential of disturbing the site. And one thing to remember is that even the footprints (at least at the Apollo 11 site) have historical significance.

[1] As far as I am aware, I am the only person to have ever graduated from my university with a Bachelor of Arts in History, minoring in Chemistry and with a diploma of Education. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure it's important to preserve Appolo 11 site. But there are others where that significance diminishes.

If you designate every spot a one time landing site, you'll run out landing zones.

Preserve one or two, let the others be visitable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fairly similar to NASA's proposed approach. They want serious exclusion zones around the Apollo 11 and 17 sites. They are a little more relaxed about visits to other Apollo landing sites, but ask people to remember that they have some experiments that are still operational, and also request that people "look but don't touch".

On the other hand, they've presented a list of objects that could be examined as part of a serious research program into Apollo 15, and have demonstrated that you could achieve a lot of worthwhile observations with a rover that was equipped only with an HD camera.

Details of their proposal:

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/617743main_NASA-USG_LUNAR_HISTORIC_SITES_RevA-508.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If anyone goes back to the moon it'll undoubtedly be the Chinese, largely for flag-waving purposes. They're the only folks with a serious moon programme, and with the political will and resources to make it happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's fairly similar to NASA's proposed approach. They want serious exclusion zones around the Apollo 11 and 17 sites. They are a little more relaxed about visits to other Apollo landing sites, but ask people to remember that they have some experiments that are still operational, and also request that people "look but don't touch".

On the other hand, they've presented a list of objects that could be examined as part of a serious research program into Apollo 15, and have demonstrated that you could achieve a lot of worthwhile observations with a rover that was equipped only with an HD camera.

Details of their proposal:

http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/617743main_NASA-USG_LUNAR_HISTORIC_SITES_RevA-508.pdf

There basically turning the landing sites into lunar museums, which is completely reasonable. Next to the moon is most likely going to be china.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really hope the US is next simply because I'm American and have pride but the chances of that are getting slimmer everyday. Anyway my hope would be the next mission would a NASA mission with a multicultural crew like they did for some shuttle missions. Truthfully though I think the next people to go is going to be a private sector sending up some space tourists to orbit the Moon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the US goes back to the moon, it is going to be for an economic or military purpose. They have no other reason to go back. China, on the other hand, still needs to put their flag up there. So I predict it will be China that goes to the Moon next.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see China getting there next. No one else can be bothered.

The Indians (people from India, not native Americans) say they will have manned mission to Mars next year, which off course is impossible since the window to Mars has closed and the next one isn't until 2016

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting the Titanium back to Earth would require some serious infrastructure; we're really not short on any metal enough to justify the expense of getting it from any orbital source.

What troubles me more is the method of deorbiting any significant amount or ore without causing serious disturbance down here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

China plan to put men on the moon by 2020. As the SLS probably wont be even doing test flights until that time they will likely be next. Although there is the possibility of a private company doing it first, however private spaceflight has just now begun to operate in LEO and do not have any significant manned operations. Unless the industry picks up considerable steam in the next eight years then China will be the next on the moon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...