Jump to content

Metallic Hydrogen As Radiation Shielding


Spacescifi

Recommended Posts

 

 

 

 

Just curious if it would work. Since hydrogen absorbs radiation. Would it also do it it's metallic form? Assuming we managed to make a stable form of it and layered beneath the outer hull as a protective inner layer? This is a scifi idea I admit, but I just wanted to know if it could work?

 

If it does...

 

Pros: Lighter weight radiation protection, as opposed to having tons of water/concrete  between crew and the outer hull.

Cons:  If something really hot pierces the hull, the metallic hydrogen is liable to blow up.... and I think several here are aware of just how explosive metallic hydrogen is. It's like metallic dynamite... but worse.

 

 

Your thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It absorbs radiation, just not well.  No reason to use it in place of liquid hydrogen, anyway.  Of course the only reason you would use metallic hydrogen is if it is metastable (or possibly just stable).  Unfortunately it isn't, so nobody really cares.

Typically the only thing that matters about shielding is the total mass (probably not true for all forms of radiation, but if you don't have enough mass you will get fried.  If you do you won't).  Hydrogen is lousy for this (unless you have rather full fuel tanks.  In that case have them between your radiation source and all crewed and critical parts of the spaceship).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Spacescifi said:

Since hydrogen absorbs radiation

It does a better-than average job than other materials against charged particle radiation. But there's no real need to go for such elaborate solutions compared with polyethylene. And for the inner anti-gamma belt, you want something on the uranium end of the periodic table.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bad idea, because metallic hydrogen isn't metastable, and even if it was, radiation is one of the things that can "set off" a metastable material. If anything, you'd need radiation shielding for the metallic hydrogen.

That said, don't use metallic hydrogen. It's already been proven not to work that way. It isn't metastable, as far as we know, so it isn't a good rocket propellant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...