Jump to content

[0.16 STOCK] Orca-X SSTO (Single Stage To Orbit)


Taquarinha

Recommended Posts

Skunk_Works_taq.png

After many years of disastrous test flights, poor aircraft and poor designs Taquarinha Skunk Works presents its new SSTO very maneuverable, very good glide characteristics, very powerfull engines.

Orca-X__7_.PNG

Before Start-up:

Orca-X__0_.PNG

Supersonic Transition:

Orca-X__1_.PNG

Engine Cutoff:

Orca-X__2_.PNG

Insertion Burn:

Orca-X__3_.PNG

On Kerbin Orbit:

Orca-X__4_.PNG

De-Orbit Burn:

Orca-X__5_.PNG

40° attitude for reentry:

Orca-X__6_.PNG

(After this the game crashed because my low-end computer)

Download link: http://www57.zippyshare.com/v/66737750/file.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I guess to be fair, this guy did post a link to his ship on my thread, so in the name of connectitude.... http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/showthread.php/20223-0-16-Stock-Orca-IV-SSTO-%28a-T1G-design%29

This is my design of a 3 man ssto...

What does that have to do with this thread?

He only posted because your names severely conflicted with his.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes, but I was on the name Orca when I achieved success, if I had made a breakthrough about a week earlier, the ship would have been named the Humpback (insert roman numeral). it is a massive coincidence, and i do not appreciate him posting his design on my thread, so I gave him a toke of his own medicine. Petty; yes. Immature;yes. Justified; extremely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

... ehhhhh.... my point is this, at times there will be name overlap in KSP. I am not sure if this is because there are so many people designing ships and posting them or if there is a common logic to all the names given to ships that get posted. Now we could argue about who came up with the name first, who's ship is better; but that idea tires me. I honestly don't care about name overlap, what I do care about is someone posting a link to their ship in a post where I am trying to promote my ship. It would be like having a press conference to promote the Xbox, when Sony comes in and starts pitching for the PS3. While both products achieve the end result of entertainment, there is no possible way that the products are similar enough to justify Sony crashing an Xbox event. To put this in internet terms, if you pee in my pool and run, I will pee in yours.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be like having a press conference to promote the Xbox, when Sony comes in and starts pitching for the PS3. While both products achieve the end result of entertainment, there is no possible way that the products are similar enough to justify Sony crashing an Xbox event.

boy-that-escalated-quickly.jpg

Anyhow, this plane will do superb when other planets are implemented, as you can do easier landings. Would be even better if it could land on a moon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...