Origins of universe

[Thoughtful411]

What if the edge of the universe we perceive as inflation, 

accelerating universe is really the pulling of known visible matter; into the event horizon of a black hole, unobservable to us, but 

 

What we see as space between matter being separated at an observable boundary at an ever constantly accelerated speed...

 

Is actually matter being lost to the event horizon of that black hole...

 

This could explain the boundary of observable universe...

The stretching of our universe...

The rate of change of that stretch...

The great stretch is actually the great contraction of space, time, matter, energy into a finite point...

 

We would not perceive it as contraction in our plain (universe) because the lost portions of universe (edge of observable universe) are being vacuumed away into that black hole event horizon.

[Wjolcz]

What if...

...I'm just a brain in a jar and nothing is real, even this thread?

Edited January 31, 2020 by Wjolcz

[Jaelommiss]

2 hours ago, Thoughtful411 said:

What if the edge of the universe we perceive as inflation, 

accelerating universe is really the pulling of known visible matter; into the event horizon of a black hole, unobservable to us,

The observable universe is a sphere that we are in the center of. The edge of the observable universe is the surface of that sphere. For the edge of the observable universe to be falling into the event horizon of a black hole, the observable universe must be nested inside a black hole. This black hole would have its mass on the outside of its event horizon.

I lack the training to definitively state that this is impossible, but I have a hard time believing that the observable universe exists inside an inverted black hole without that assertion coming from a reputable figure in the scientific community. There are a few other things that you said that I am skeptical of, but they would require far more explanation than I have time for right now.

It sounds a little bit like you're suggesting that the observable universe is a white hole. I'm not confident enough in my knowledge on that topic to say anything about that.

Could you tell us a little bit about your education on the topic? Getting a sense for what knowledge went into forming your idea would help us assess it further.

Edited January 31, 2020 by Jaelommiss

[kerbiloid]

(Somebody should leave this here)

"Physicists have a tradition. Every 13 billion years they build and run the Large Hadron Collider..."

[mikegarrison]

3 hours ago, kerbiloid said:

(Somebody should leave this here)

"Physicists have a tradition. Every 13 billion years they build and run the Large Hadron Collider..."

That's kind of the (partial) plot of Joe Haldeman's Forever Peace.

[sevenperforce]

The volume and mass of a black hole are related by the equation r_s = 2GM/c², where r_s is the Schwarzschild radius, G is the gravitational constant, M is the mass contained within the black hole, and c is the speed of light. Quite by coincidence, the mass of the observable universe is such that if you calculate its Schwarzschild radius, you get 24 billion light years, which is around 60% of the radius of the observable universe. So a lot of people like to speculate that the universe is a "white hole" -- a black hole turned inside out with a wormhole from another universe.

It's a nice idea, but it doesn't really work. One of the big problems is that it suggests that the position of the Milky Way is near the actual, physical center of the universe, which violates the Copernican principle. And a white hole wouldn't really work the way our universe appears to have worked. Also, the universe is spatially flat and is not ever going to collapse on itself, so positing this theory as a means of explaining the universe's past origin fails too.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/the-universe-is-not-a-black-hole

 

[kerbiloid]

I'm afraid, we just live in a
 

Spoiler

jar of mouldy jam

or in
 

Spoiler

somebody's brain

 

 

[magnemoe]

On 1/31/2020 at 9:19 PM, kerbiloid said:

(Somebody should leave this here)

"Physicists have a tradition. Every 13 billion years they build and run the Large Hadron Collider..."

13 billion is kind of weird. 
Also the LHC is an very cheap toy.  
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oh-My-God_particle
Yes it was an particle with the energy of an baseball at 100 km/h.

Design an particle accelerator to produce this, you have an unlimited budget, advanced room temperature superconductors and touch ships for realism.