Emilius73 Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 How will the true volumetrics system be applied to 3rd-party planets or rescales? Will they require separate configs like with regular EVE, or can they be created with the GUI that I've seen in some of the screenshots? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benzo Kerman Posted October 19, 2022 Share Posted October 19, 2022 @blackrack on the subject of the volumetrics looking weird from ss, would it be possible to sort of like smooth them out a bit, so they don't look silly as you described them? Sort of like how in MSFS 2020, changing the cloud quality setting just changes how detailed they look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSabe Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 On 10/18/2022 at 1:59 PM, blackrack said: Yeah I was thinking about scatterer's secondary lights but it can't do planetshine yet, so just additional suns. Additional lights will nearly double the performance hit as at every point raymarched a secondary raymarch needs to be done towards the light source. I was thinking of dropping the quality of secondary lights or trying to find some other approximation. Maybe even only sample the light currently shining the brightest, that way it cycles between different lights as needed, and still sample the sky and scattering contributions for all lights to help blend it. Well, I was picturing a static-intensity approximation by telling it the moon/parent is a sun, which is something that seems to work in Scatterer, with it only causing issues with the fact that lighting the terrain requires dealing with KSP's light system which doesn't work well when things at different directions to the source are visible at once (due to the whole light-is-actually-at-infinity thing). On 10/18/2022 at 1:59 PM, blackrack said: For using the world itself as light source it'd probably "just work" if there is support for multiple lights just like in scatterer where people put an atmo on the sun and make it shine on itself. That works? Well, I know what I'm doing to Achlys now. 5 hours ago, blackrack said: Ehh they don't add much in my opinion. Besides, IRL I see them very rarely. I see rainbows all the time, even double rainbows and above happen sometimes, at least where I live. But I imagine the difficulty and cost of implementing them in a good way is probably not worth it anyways. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DasBear1 Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 I have KSRSS installed along with EVE and Scatterer, for some reason Scatterer doesn't change the water and EVE messes with everything else Scatterer is doing. The poles are two bright, the back of the Earth is still lit for some reason, and the light extinction between the light and dark sides doesn't appear any more. Would anyone know how to fix this, or where I should go to look for help? Example Photos Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrack Posted October 20, 2022 Author Share Posted October 20, 2022 (edited) 10 hours ago, Emilius73 said: How will the true volumetrics system be applied to 3rd-party planets or rescales? Will they require separate configs like with regular EVE, or can they be created with the GUI that I've seen in some of the screenshots? You need separate EVE configs, they can also be configured with the existing EVE gui. 9 hours ago, Benzo Kerman said: @blackrack on the subject of the volumetrics looking weird from ss, would it be possible to sort of like smooth them out a bit, so they don't look silly as you described them? Sort of like how in MSFS 2020, changing the cloud quality setting just changes how detailed they look. That really doesn't do much apart from making them look like a blobby version of the 2d texture. 5 hours ago, WarriorSabe said: Well, I was picturing a static-intensity approximation by telling it the moon/parent is a sun, which is something that seems to work in Scatterer, with it only causing issues with the fact that lighting the terrain requires dealing with KSP's light system which doesn't work well when things at different directions to the source are visible at once (due to the whole light-is-actually-at-infinity thing). That works? Well, I know what I'm doing to Achlys now. I see rainbows all the time, even double rainbows and above happen sometimes, at least where I live. But I imagine the difficulty and cost of implementing them in a good way is probably not worth it anyways. I think there was a misunderstanding, the issue is not that to make the light itself static, the issue is that when traversing the volume you also need to do a secondary traversal towards the light source to find how much light actually reaches inside the cloud, that's what gets expensive with multiple lights and it doesn't look right when replaced with a flat term. For me rainbows have been very rare irl (and I've never seen one from a plane to this day but I've seen every other atmospheric phenomenon) but yeah they just look silly in my opinion and I don't think they are worth the effort. 2 hours ago, DasBear1 said: I have KSRSS installed along with EVE and Scatterer, for some reason Scatterer doesn't change the water and EVE messes with everything else Scatterer is doing. The poles are two bright, the back of the Earth is still lit for some reason, and the light extinction between the light and dark sides doesn't appear any more. Would anyone know how to fix this, or where I should go to look for help? Example Photos Maybe an install issue but you should ask in the KSRSS thread. Edited October 20, 2022 by blackrack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pingopete Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 (edited) 17 hours ago, blackrack said: Yeah things really don't look good at all from orbit right now unless scaled to humongous proportions, it's hard to explain but it's a combination of the temporal upscaling not handling high-frequency detail well, the raymarching noise/flickering at those distances and the noise/cloudtypes distributions looking uniform-ish and repetitive at that scale. If scaled up to look good from orbit they look very big and out of place from the ground and when flying through at low altitudes, while still looking unrealistic from orbit. I'm not sure what you mean about the transition but the 3d volumetrics are derived from the 2d layer so fading in to the 2d should be ok. In the previous images I posted both the godrays and the cloud-on-cloud shadows are just read directly from the 2d layer texture for performance and you can't tell most of the time. Ehh they don't add much in my opinion. Besides, IRL I see them very rarely. Ah gotcha, I spent some time looking at volumetric from orbit in other games and can see what you mean about the repetition. Probably won't be possible - but I wonder if one could gradually increase the scale you mention with distance, and how that might look? If it was possible that might allow you to have a smooth transition from high detail clouds when close to larger scale cloudlets on the horizon from orbit? Again I haven't the faintest clue how the system works under the hood so forgive my ignorance on this subject Assuming this would just be to complex or impossible to implement Edited October 20, 2022 by pingopete Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrack Posted October 20, 2022 Author Share Posted October 20, 2022 (edited) 23 minutes ago, pingopete said: Ah gotcha, I spent some time looking at volumetric from orbit in other games and can see what you mean about the repetition. Probably won't be possible - but I wonder if one could gradually increase the scale you mention with distance, and how that might look? If it was possible that might allow you to have a smooth transition from high detail clouds when close to larger scale cloudlets on the horizon from orbit? Again I haven't the faintest clue how the system works under the hood so forgive my ignorance on this subject Assuming this would just be to complex or impossible to implement Which games are those btw? Just for reference. I know in msfs it looks really bad from orbit (and the draw distance is limited). I see what you mean, like it's done in the terrain shaders, but already that implies doubling the noise samples in the raymarching loop and blending between them, which is very expensive because it's in the raymarching loop and it's done potentially hundreds of times per pixel, then there is the issue of this scaling throwing off the balance of things like cumulonimbus clouds and the vertical profile of the clouds in relation to what is painted horizontally on the clouds map. This will introduce all kinds of problems so not sure about it for now. This will make more sense after release when you see how the clouds are configured and how a delicate balance is needed between the noise scale, the cloud height, and what is painted on the cloud map. With that said, on Jool there is probably going to be some large scale clouds which work well from orbit, I hope that works as well as I'm imagining it Edited October 20, 2022 by blackrack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSabe Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 10 hours ago, blackrack said: I think there was a misunderstanding, the issue is not that to make the light itself static, the issue is that when traversing the volume you also need to do a secondary traversal towards the light source to find how much light actually reaches inside the cloud, that's what gets expensive with multiple lights and it doesn't look right when replaced with a flat term. Oh no I totally got that, and was my assumption when initially asking about multiple sources.. I probably should have cropped the quote because I was responding to you saying Scatterer couldn't do planetshine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrack Posted October 20, 2022 Author Share Posted October 20, 2022 8 minutes ago, WarriorSabe said: Oh no I totally got that, and was my assumption when initially asking about multiple sources.. I probably should have cropped the quote because I was responding to you saying Scatterer couldn't do planetshine. Ah I see, well in scatterer there is the issue of not lighting the terrain like you mentioned but also if you want to use it as planetshine the angle to the sun isn't taken into account, ie no full moon or moon phases but always a constant intensity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSabe Posted October 20, 2022 Share Posted October 20, 2022 4 minutes ago, blackrack said: Ah I see, well in scatterer there is the issue of not lighting the terrain like you mentioned but also if you want to use it as planetshine the angle to the sun isn't taken into account, ie no full moon or moon phases but always a constant intensity. Yeah, that's what I meant by a static-intensity approximation. And I do wish KSP's light wasn't that annoying directional light that prevents you from having things in multiple phases visible at once (like in compact red dwarf systems or moon systems with noticeable planetshine) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cattasraafe Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 Was looking around. I haven't found this question but I'm sure its been asked. Are there any experimental versions of this up yet? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillTFB Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 Hey I'm having issues with clouds being the wrong color. It's a fresh install so I don't understand why this is happening. https://imgur.com/a/TRVlo5b here's a screenshot if that helps. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrack Posted October 21, 2022 Author Share Posted October 21, 2022 8 hours ago, Cattasraafe said: Was looking around. I haven't found this question but I'm sure its been asked. Are there any experimental versions of this up yet? Not yet but soon 5 hours ago, WillTFB said: Hey I'm having issues with clouds being the wrong color. It's a fresh install so I don't understand why this is happening. https://imgur.com/a/TRVlo5b here's a screenshot if that helps. Can't really tell much, but likely a config issue, include which mods you installed+versions+log file, and more screenshots Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilya_G Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 (edited) @blackrack, KSP 2 went into early access. How are you doing with the mod? Maybe it should also be put into early access? Edited October 21, 2022 by Ilya_G Added a video from the developers Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrack Posted October 21, 2022 Author Share Posted October 21, 2022 29 minutes ago, Ilya_G said: @blackrack, KSP 2 went into early access. How are you doing with the mod? Maybe it should also be put into early access? Maybe not Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spaceman.Spiff Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 58 minutes ago, Ilya_G said: KSP 2 went into early access. That’s a bit of an overstatement. There’s still about four months till it’s out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrack Posted October 21, 2022 Author Share Posted October 21, 2022 45 minutes ago, Spaceman.Spiff said: That’s a bit of an overstatement. There’s still about four months till it’s out. Four months for me to finish my stuff in peace Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socowez Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 7 hours ago, Spaceman.Spiff said: That’s a bit of an overstatement. There’s still about four months till it’s out. Why did it take me that long to register that February 24th, 2023 is only 4 months away? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WillTFB Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 18 hours ago, blackrack said: Can't really tell much, but likely a config issue, include which mods you installed+versions+log file, and more screenshots Screen shots: https://imgur.com/a/SPyUQSD Folders in GameData Folder (in order): Quote B9PartSwitch BoulderCo CommunityResourcePack CyroTanks DeployableEngines DynamicBatteryStorage EnviromentalVisualEnhancements Extras FarFutureechnologies GameData HeatControl NearFutureAeronautics NearFutureContructs NearFutureElectrical NearFutureExploration NearFutureProps NearFutureSolar NearFutureSpacecraft Parallax_StockTextures PlanetShine SCANsat Scarrerer ScattererAtmosphereCache SpaceDust Squad SquadExpansion StationPartsExpansionRedux StockWaterfallEffects SystemHeat Waterfall WildBlueIndustries Log (sorry for google doc; page keeps crashing when I try to post the log): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rjNHp0zGLCTNO7wCQ3BK4VqHELB64Ovz/view?usp=sharing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrack Posted October 22, 2022 Author Share Posted October 22, 2022 1 hour ago, WillTFB said: Screen shots: https://imgur.com/a/SPyUQSD Folders in GameData Folder (in order): Log (sorry for google doc; page keeps crashing when I try to post the log): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1rjNHp0zGLCTNO7wCQ3BK4VqHELB64Ovz/view?usp=sharing The only problem I see is that you have a GameData folder inside GameData. First try deleting that additional GameData. Second try to run without any other mods and just a fresh reinstall of scatterer+EVE+boulderco and see if anything changes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pingopete Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 On 10/20/2022 at 11:24 AM, blackrack said: Which games are those btw? Just for reference. I know in msfs it looks really bad from orbit (and the draw distance is limited). I see what you mean, like it's done in the terrain shaders, but already that implies doubling the noise samples in the raymarching loop and blending between them, which is very expensive because it's in the raymarching loop and it's done potentially hundreds of times per pixel, then there is the issue of this scaling throwing off the balance of things like cumulonimbus clouds and the vertical profile of the clouds in relation to what is painted horizontally on the clouds map. This will introduce all kinds of problems so not sure about it for now. This will make more sense after release when you see how the clouds are configured and how a delicate balance is needed between the noise scale, the cloud height, and what is painted on the cloud map. With that said, on Jool there is probably going to be some large scale clouds which work well from orbit, I hope that works as well as I'm imagining it I guess I really only looked at DCS, MSFS and Star Citizen to be fair, but yeah MSFS just hard cuts them off before the horizon, and I guess as mentioned here Star Citizen just uses a massive noise scale. This makes sense, I guess you'd be running two cloud setups in paralel and switch between so at least double the performance cost. But I'm definitely keen to tinker around with the values once it's available! I was wondering; would these volumetrics be compatible with the older 2D cloud detail maps that include transparency that I had been using for RSS? And also with the 6x 8x8k global cloud cube maps? Jool should make a great experimentation area for larger scale and SS volumetrics for sure! Can't wait to see what you can come up with! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Socowez Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 On 10/21/2022 at 10:11 AM, blackrack said: Maybe not Maybe you should take your time and tell the ungrateful fans to be happy with current progress Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSabe Posted October 22, 2022 Share Posted October 22, 2022 (edited) I was thinking about this again (because it's hard not to), got another question: will the new volumetrics have an option to be self-lit, for things like volumetric aurorae? The option to disable shadow casting would work well for those too, I'd imagine. And also, how did the fog work, where it was all transparent even at maximum opacity; is that a separate key or a clever way of making the maps? Edited October 22, 2022 by WarriorSabe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blackrack Posted October 23, 2022 Author Share Posted October 23, 2022 (edited) On 10/22/2022 at 5:22 PM, pingopete said: I guess I really only looked at DCS, MSFS and Star Citizen to be fair, but yeah MSFS just hard cuts them off before the horizon, and I guess as mentioned here Star Citizen just uses a massive noise scale. This makes sense, I guess you'd be running two cloud setups in paralel and switch between so at least double the performance cost. But I'm definitely keen to tinker around with the values once it's available! I was wondering; would these volumetrics be compatible with the older 2D cloud detail maps that include transparency that I had been using for RSS? And also with the 6x 8x8k global cloud cube maps? Jool should make a great experimentation area for larger scale and SS volumetrics for sure! Can't wait to see what you can come up with! Yeah both the cubemaps and detail textures will be supported, although I haven't added support for detail textures yet but it will be there, I know it's important for some pseudo-dynamic cloud setups. 21 hours ago, WarriorSabe said: I was thinking about this again (because it's hard not to), got another question: will the new volumetrics have an option to be self-lit, for things like volumetric aurorae? The option to disable shadow casting would work well for those too, I'd imagine. And also, how did the fog work, where it was all transparent even at maximum opacity; is that a separate key or a clever way of making the maps? So I don't have a self-lighting option yet but it will be trivial to add so I can add it. There is a density variable that controls how the cloud looks and it can go anywhere from dense cloud to very thin mist/fog. It's a bit different from painting a lower value on the 2d map as that works more like "this point has this % chance of being covered by a cloud", if that makes sense, the 2d map essentially works like a probability map that modulates the 3d noise, I just call it "coverage map" now. For example in this old gif I posted a while back I'm animating the alpha value of a 2d map (basically just i terpolating it over time from 0 to its real value) and this is how it behaves, notice it never turns to thin fog/mist just cloud blobs: I plan to provide this and a density fade as transition modes for when I fade layers in/out over time (what I plan to use for pseudo-weather transitions, making rain/fog/clouds appear/disappear at given time intervals etc). Also this means that if you use the detail texture to make pseudo-dynamic clouds and you give it soft edges it will behave like this as well when transitioning. Edited October 23, 2022 by blackrack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarriorSabe Posted October 23, 2022 Share Posted October 23, 2022 2 hours ago, blackrack said: There is a density variable that controls how the cloud looks and it can go anywhere from dense cloud to very thin mist/fog. It's a bit different from painting a lower value on the 2d map as that works more like "this point has this % chance of being covered by a cloud", if that makes sense, the 2d map essentially works like a probability map that modulates the 3d noise, I just call it "coverage map" now. For example in this old gif I posted a while back I'm animating the alpha value of a 2d map (basically just i terpolating it over time from 0 to its real value) and this is how it behaves, notice it never turns to thin fog/mist just cloud blobs: Yeah I remember how the map worked; that was what led me to be curious about how the fog worked (partly since aurorae would benefit from transparency as well). 2 hours ago, blackrack said: Also this means that if you use the detail texture to make pseudo-dynamic clouds and you give it soft edges it will behave like this as well when transitioning. And to clarify something I think I remember from a while back, there's also separate maps that serve to confine layers to geographical positions, like biomes, right? Thinking about differing climate zones across worlds, or tidally locked ones where clouds mostly form in one place then drift away from it. Actually, thinking on how those last ones move; it's probably a stretch but would a "motion map" be possible? With e.g. red channel north-south green channel east-west or what have you. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.