Neutrinos... A Safe Power Or Drive Source?

[Hannu2]

On 4/6/2023 at 12:28 PM, Spacescifi said:

I know little about neutrinos other than that they pass through everything all the time. What if we could capture and store a bunch of them to use as an energy source?

 

Would that make it safe? Scenario means we must both have a means to capture and absorb large amounts of neutrinos as will as release them as heat or radiant energy.

Could this be a safer alternative to fusion or antimatter? Only requires high tech?

You would need technology based on currently unknown natural laws. You can assume whatever to get is as safe and practical as you want. But to realize you have to find the laws you have described. Good luck. Unfortunately I do not buy shares of your company.

On 4/6/2023 at 12:42 PM, Spacescifi said:

Edit: Interestingly you could use them in a beam to communucate through solid rock. Want to send a message through to the other side of the planet? No problem! Use a a neutrino radio and so long someone on the other side of the planet has a neutrino receiver and you aimed right you're golden.

If you do not assume any self invented natural laws, neutrino receiver is always very bulky. You have to use huge power to produce neutrinos. It is difficult to see any practical applications.

[lajoswinkler]

On 4/7/2023 at 1:10 AM, darthgently said:

Reading "naser" made my day.

Watch out! He's got a naser rifle!  Oh yeah, nevermind.  Stand down.

Naser sounds quite bad in Croatian and several other languages. It would be a bad marketing choice. LOL

[darthgently]

3 hours ago, lajoswinkler said:

Naser sounds quite bad in Croatian and several other languages. It would be a bad marketing choice. LOL

Time to hit Google Translate for edutainment purposes 

[Shpaget]

6 hours ago, darthgently said:

Time to hit Google Translate for edutainment purposes 

Thoroughly disappointed, right? Google translate is not capable of grasping the sheer genius of potty mouthness of Croatian language.

[darthgently]

5 hours ago, Shpaget said:

Thoroughly disappointed, right? Google translate is not capable of grasping the sheer genius of potty mouthness of Croatian language.

Yep

 

[lajoswinkler]

On 4/15/2023 at 12:30 AM, darthgently said:

Time to hit Google Translate for edutainment purposes 

Software translators won't have enough ability to translate these things for at least a decade (I'm counting attempts at artificial intelligence here).

"Na" means "on" and can be used as a prefix, just like in English, for example "onslaught".

"Ser-" is a suffix that comes from "srati" ("to defecate", vulgar form).

So yeah. Plenty of fun in my language. LOL

[kerbiloid]

That's great, that in Russian the English word "naser" would be transliterated as "nazer", like "lazer", 'mazer', 'grazer', 'tazer' so the archaic tier of the vocabulary would not be involved.

It's almost as great as the planet called just Uran.

Thanks Deutsch for still being traditionally used in transliterations.
(Btw, they could easily use one letter 'ч' instead of four 'tsch' for "ch" sounds. Deuч).

Upd.
As well, English could use 'ш' instead of 'sh' (Engliш) and 'щ' instead of 'shch'. Why complicate?

Edited April 16, 2023 by kerbiloid