Jump to content

Has anyone made a landing sled..intentionally?


inigma

Recommended Posts

Ok so instead of trying to land pinpoint downwards on a body, I had a crazy thought this morning: has anyone developed a lander that intentionally lands by sledding? I then wondered about the possibility of developing an "ablative" sled... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sort of: I tried building unpowered impactors some time ago - had some luck with a "sandwich" technology to make them, uhm, impact safely on Kerbin.

subsequent tests on the Mun didn't lead to satisfactory results, though :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use my rocket as a cushion when landing my rovers. The rover is on treads, so it can take quite a fall. But I mount it to the top of the rocket, then when landing, kill thrust about 25-50m up and just let the rocket get flattened under the rover. It works pretty well!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what it would take to make an impact resistant lander sledding shell tolerant of multiple 100 m/s impacts...

It might look like probe encased in a metal bullet-shaped shell designed to land at 100 m/s at an angle of 10 degrees...

Edited by inigma
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A dodecahadron cage around your lander that lets you just cut thrust an nail the surface at around 100m/s would be amazing.

Who wants to go sledding? :) If someone makes it, we could start a challenge thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

C7's old pack, before he became a developer for KSP, had landing skids, since proper wheels didn't exist. They actually worked really well. He had some wheels, but they were static and were prone to bending over and exploding, resulting in the death of your Kerbals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've experimented with lithobraking on purpose, I've even built some rovers that landed at ~50 meters per second and braked by bursting all their wheels and followed by punching into the grund down with their reinforced bottom. I however found out that pure lithobraking is unreliable because other, weaker parts become disconnected or forced into each other and explode during impact.I suppose this will be a problem too when sliding.

Edited by MBobrik
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Heh, I remember my first space plane landing on one of Kerbin's moons, Minmus if I remember correctly. Instead of going forward and attempting to brake slowly, I instead reversed my plane and landed backwards, going somewhere around 200m/s, then proceeded to slow down :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not quite the same, but I made some simple airbags for glancing/skidding landings on moons or planets with no atmosphere.

http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/cp-airbag-system/

I'm not sure how killroykill got those things to not explode at that speed/impact though, they are quite fragile at times. You could prolly coat the entire outside of your craft in landing gear and get away with something similar though. The landing gear is pretty tough if you can keep them attached and mounted. Maybe steel beams poking out like a sea urchin with landing gear and struts coating the whole mess. Dang, this could be a fun challenge!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...