Rate that Sig

[Shna_na]

7/10

I don't understand the reference, but I won't dock points for that.

+2 that typography... There is hope for humanity.

+1 Not cluttered.

+2 Not your own images, but I assume that's part of the reference I don't get.

+3 assuming you made this, you made it well.

-1 that mouse has... an atmosphere?

I fixed mine, thanks for the little hint there mikeman7918, how did I miss that?

[CaptainGiblets]

10/10 Still laughing from the quote

[Flymetothemun]

Good ol Al. 10/10

[astropapi1]

7/10

Nice quotes, especially the last one.

[Dooz]

8/10 exactly

[Shna_na]

5/10

+2 2 unique quotes

+1 the second one's some deep stuff

+1 not cluttered

+1 Not distracting from the post

+2 I really need to change my points system to fir this kind of thing...

-1 grammatical innacuracies (including missing quotation marks, but that's not bad enough to dock extra points)

-1 It's a little... Plain.

When I put it like that, it seems kind of a low score... It isn't even as bad as you'd expect from a 3, I need to change my points system . (yeah, I gave you extra for that)

[mrrpamplemousse]

7/10

-It's seems to be a little broken, I mean, it's me or the ribbons are placed a little stangely? (It's also a little hidden)

+But it's a cool quote though...

[AletzN1]

9/10

+cool quote

=wierd quote

+tiny in size

+not distracting

+explaining link I won't click

-ponies... Not that there's anything wrong but still

Oh and the numbers below me are hex, you can translate them.

[Starwhip]

OOOH numbers! Maybe I'll spend time in a few mins.

but until that, 10/10 for numberzez.

[Shna_na]

6/10 (my marking is harsh)

+2 not cluttered or distracting

+1 Portal 2 reference, I like it

+1 Great quote

+1 Effort needed to get the quote

+1 Good layout

- Not going to rate you on the trailer, that would be unfair.

[mrrpamplemousse]

+I like your logo / art

+I like that quote

-I can't see the last part

7.5/10

[austin4050]

+I like the good quotes

-It is in a small(ish) font

6.8/10 I do like the quotes and a little bit about you (I think). But it is rather small in my opinion.

[Giggleplex777]

8/10

+Russian

+Links

+Apologies

-No pictures

Edited February 12, 2014 by Giggleplex777

[mrrpamplemousse]

=Publicity

+Cool design

-Partialy hidden

7.6/10

Is it only me, or most of the sig are semi-hidden?

[Giggleplex777]

=Publicity

+Cool design

-Partialy hidden

7.6/10

Is it only me, or most of the sig are semi-hidden?

How is it hidden? Are you on a phone? You can scroll the signatures.

[astropapi1]

9.5/10. Awesomeness everywhere.

Is it only me, or most of the sig are semi-hidden?

Are you on mobile? I can see his sig just fine.

Ah crap, double post...

Edited February 12, 2014 by sal_vager

[The Destroyer]

9/10 Love the quote, love the kerbal, not sure what the image is.

[Starwhip]

Lets see.

+1 for liftoff

+1 for stage1

+1 for separation

+1 for stage2

+1 for separation

+1 for stage3

+1 for separation

+1 for stage4

+1 for reentry and landing.

Metinks 10/10

[panzerknoef]

6/10 It's not KSP, but mostly it's doesn't fit...

[astropapi1]

6/10. Just wait until we get contracts.

9/10 Love the quote, love the kerbal, not sure what the image is.

Click on it.

[robopilot99]

7/10

Dres is a sad lonely space potato

[Shna_na]

6/10

+1 not cluttered, well organised

+1 the text doesn't look bad

+2 Nice screenshot

+1 image with a link explaining what it is

+1 I need to change my scoring system, it's far too harsh

[NQMT]

7/10. In my opinion, I don't like the way it's set out. Other than that, it's great.

[The Destroyer]

7/10 Do like Formula k. Purple.

[Nuke]

2.9/pi

cool graphic.