Jump to content

Sending a corpse into interstellar space. Would you volunteer after your death?


szputnyik

Recommended Posts

XD fair enough. I was waiting for someone to catch that.

Since there are many forum members for whom english is not their primary language, I give them the benefit of a doubt; meaning in this case that the title of the OP may not be so much a trick question as it may seem. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't make much sense though. Your body gets destroyed before anyone can find anything.

I don't think sending anything so slow in random directions just so it could potentially be found makes any sense at all. Sending radio messages everywhere makes much more sense and is much faster.

Edited by Canopus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sending radio signals is more difficult, if not impossible for interstellar distances, because in time, the signal would just fade into thermal or background radiation. I read somewhere that if in the future there will be human colonies in other star systems, and our understanding of physics doesn't change significantly (finding a way to send messages reliably to vast distances, preferably faster than light) it would actually make more sense to communicate with them with "snail mail", essentially written letters sent on probes that could automatically decelerate at the new system, than to attempt radio contact.

Edited by szputnyik
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sending radio signals is more difficult, if not impossible for interstellar distances, because in time, the signal would just fade into thermal or background radiation.

On the flipside they are dirt cheap and move at light speed. Adding more power to a transmitter or more sensitivity to a receiver is fairly easy. There are some folks messing around with laser messaging at interstellar distances, but it's either that or radio.

Edited by Seret
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This brings up the question, how would an unprotected body decompose in space?

Strictly speaking it wouldn't. Space is very cold and dry, the body would dessicate quickly, and the microorganisms that normally break a body down would perish. You might get a bit of swelling from autolysis, but the cold might stop even that once the body had cooled. Drying of a body is enough to cause mummification (Egyptian sand burials, Peruvian mummies, etc) and prevent normal decomposition. The body would break down very slowly after that, but I wouldn't like to say by what exact process. It just wouldn't be the normal one where bacteria turn you to mush.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This brings up the question, how would an unprotected body decompose in space?

An unprotected body in space wouldn't decompose (at least not like it does on Earth, since that requires the action of other organisms). An unprotected body in space would basically freeze-dry. Then over a long period of time I suspect it would get eroded away by micrometeorite impacts, cosmic ray sputtering, and ultraviolet from stars breaking down the organic molecules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sending radio signals is more difficult, if not impossible for interstellar distances, because in time, the signal would just fade into thermal or background radiation. I read somewhere that if in the future there will be human colonies in other star systems, and our understanding of physics doesn't change significantly (finding a way to send messages reliably to vast distances, preferably faster than light) it would actually make more sense to communicate with them with "snail mail", essentially written letters sent on probes that could automatically decelerate at the new system, than to attempt radio contact.

I think it would make more sense for the probe to carry the radio transmitter and begin transmitting when it gets close enough to the destination system. That would save all the problems of deceleration and recovery.

To the OP, I don't see the point of sending a corpse. We could send something more useful for that mass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that a typo, or have you been consulting the world's most optimistic actuarial table?

You may have been looking at the old tables, the ones that don't take into account advancing technology.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...