Balancing problems with 0.23.5 Tech Tree.

[nobbers12345]

I don't know, I have a slight problem with how the ARM parts are implemented into the tech tree.

Those parts are replaced with your mainsail, and the mainsail and parts associated are moved back to the node before it.

That means you can unlock the mainsail earlier, which I think is extremely powerful for being that early on in the tree.

I don't have a problem with the performance with ARM parts, just when you get it in career.

I'm leaving this as discussion so I can see opinions before suggesting it.

[Vanamonde]

You want opinions on ARM parts? We got opinions on ARM parts all over the place.

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/74439-The-Grand-0-23-5-Discussion-Thread

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/75696-Theory-vs-Practice-The-ARM-parts

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/75013-I-m-sorry-I-I-just-don-t-like-ARM-%28

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/75683-ARM-Parts-Poll

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/75661-The-7-Balance-Points-of-engines-in-a-Full-Career-Mode

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/75332-Can-both-Career-Mode-and-Sandbox-Mode-be-balanced-simultaneously

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/75094-Would-you-like-reducing-the-thrust-of-the-new-engines

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/75738-ARM-SLS-Parts-and-the-Start-of-The-Career-mode-age

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/75090-the-ion-engine-is-way-too-OP

http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/74603-Engine-balancing-issues-in-ARM

Rather than start yet another of these threads, please read and add your comments to one of the existing threads on the subject.