passinglurker Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Basically the view in the mockup is for when you double click the window, standard IVA seating views will not be like that (instead more focused on the control panels, etc.)The bottom of the Gemini will be a 2.5m node, lemme mockup a "Titan" rocket for you!TKS placeholders for Gemini "Skirt"http://puu.sh/fzuX7/ea0af1c325.jpgso if the skirt is 2.5 meters on the bottom and its using a tks part as a stand in then I assume the capsule is 1.875 on the bottom right?on the subject of the gemini IVA windows vs. control panels I'm afraid corvus and fasa have unfortunately also set a high standard of giving a good view of both Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 7, 2015 Author Share Posted February 7, 2015 so if the skirt is 2.5 meters on the bottom and its using a tks part as a stand in then I assume the capsule is 1.875 on the bottom right?on the subject of the gemini IVA windows vs. control panels I'm afraid corvus and fasa have unfortunately also set a high standard of giving a good view of bothhttp://i.imgur.com/pxGvTLT.pnghttp://i.imgur.com/SZFd3Ey.pngYup 1.875m I think for sure this one will have a half decent view in Iva mode, ehm, I'll have to mock up an interior mesh to play around. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billbobjebkirk Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Let me also mention: This is the replacement American spacecraft for the old D2/Spica, marking that craft officially dead, sorry to fans of it! NOOOOO!if only there were a suitable OM, then I could make one with recolored tantares stuff and PF Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
passinglurker Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 NOOOOO!if only there were a suitable OM, then I could make one with recolored tantares stuff and PFso basically a 1.25m spektr? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeenobit Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 (edited) Since upgrading, I'm getting an error with the Tantares mod in Module Manager. MM gets stuck when trying to load Tantares/Parts/ATV/Capella_Engine_A/part/Capella_Engine_A. Here's the log. Looks like the exception might be responsible:[LOG 21:28:20.708] PartLoader: Compiling Part 'Tantares/Parts/ATV/Capella_Control_A/part/Capella_Control_A'[ERR 21:28:20.719] Cannot find a PartModule of typename 'ModuleFuelTanks'[LOG 21:28:20.721] RemoteTech: ModuleRTAntenna: Found TRANSMITTER block.[LOG 21:28:20.722] Tac.LifeSupportModule[FFFA65A2][50.57]: OnAwake[LOG 21:28:20.741] Tac.LifeSupportModule[FFFA6566][50.57]: OnAwake[LOG 21:28:20.747] RemoteTech: ModuleSPU: OnDestroy[LOG 21:28:20.747] RemoteTech: ModuleRTAntenna: OnDestroy[LOG 21:28:20.750] PartLoader: Compiling Part 'Tantares/Parts/ATV/Capella_Engine_A/part/Capella_Engine_A'[WRN 21:28:20.754] PartLoader Warning: Variable oldMaxTemp not found in Part[WRN 21:28:20.754] PartLoader Warning: Variable tempMult not found in Part[LOG 21:28:20.759] MMH not found in resource database. Propellant Setup has failed.[EXC 21:28:20.760] NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object ModuleEnginesFX.SetupPropellant () ModuleEnginesFX.OnLoad (.ConfigNode node) PartModule.Load (.ConfigNode node) Part.AddModule (.ConfigNode node) PartLoader.ParsePart (.UrlConfig urlConfig, .ConfigNode node) PartLoader+.MoveNext ()Edit:I managed to fix the issue by deleting the following files:Tantares\Tantares_Extra_RealFuels.cfgTantaresLV\TantaresLV_Extra_RealFuels.cfgDeleting the first one fixed the first issue, but Module Manager got stuck again shortly after. Deleting the second one managed to load into the game fine. Since I don't use RealFuels, I don't care for these files, but I suspects they might be the cause of the issue I was having. I hope it helps. Edited February 7, 2015 by Zeenobit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DGatsby Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Basically the view in the mockup is for when you double click the window, standard IVA seating views will not be like that (instead more focused on the control panels, etc.)The bottom of the Gemini will be a 2.5m node, lemme mockup a "Titan" rocket for you!TKS placeholders for Gemini "Skirt"http://puu.sh/fzuX7/ea0af1c325.jpgBeale! I'm so happy! Sad of course to hear that the Apollo D2 is discontinued (Long live the D2!) but this new little Tantini (Gemares?) is such a good replacement. Between that, the VA pod, and the Spektr pod it is possible to have a really good progression of spacecraft outside of the Vostok, Zond, Soyuz line. I'm very excited! Also, for my taste I kind of prefer the smaller windows; Soviet spacecraft have never seemed to be too concerned with that sort of thing. Obviously this isn't a real Soviet spacecraft though!You always do such a good job making replicas of spacecraft; it's great to see you branching out a bit into your own designs with the Spektr and this little guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sackpfeife Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Thanks to the awesome Tantares Revamp, I can now go back to what I like best: Space-Station-Building Javascript is disabled. View full albumThanks again Beale, the Gemini looks really good! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dimovski Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 The guys in Lubyanka are starting to get nervous... Is comrade Beale Khlebovich now working for the kapitalist pigdogs?(Just kidding! Superb work Beale!) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niemand303 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Oh g-d, *Nicholas Cage impression* not the khleb, not the khleb! My real name is Gleb, so yeah, in school I was often called "bread", since it's just one letter away. Not to be offtop, I'm congratulating Beale on the release of AB Launchers (if someone haven't seen, check'em: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/106687-WIP-AB-Launchers-0-1-5m-Energia-parts-7-Feb) and the grand Gemini reveal. I'm currently balancing the N-1 for the TLV pack and SXT, so I will have lots of numbers soon. - - - Updated - - -Since upgrading, I'm getting an error with the Tantares mod in Module Manager. MM gets stuck when trying to load Tantares/Parts/ATV/Capella_Engine_A/part/Capella_Engine_A. Here's the log. Looks like the exception might be responsible:[LOG 21:28:20.708] PartLoader: Compiling Part 'Tantares/Parts/ATV/Capella_Control_A/part/Capella_Control_A'[ERR 21:28:20.719] Cannot find a PartModule of typename 'ModuleFuelTanks'[LOG 21:28:20.721] RemoteTech: ModuleRTAntenna: Found TRANSMITTER block.[LOG 21:28:20.722] Tac.LifeSupportModule[FFFA65A2][50.57]: OnAwake[LOG 21:28:20.741] Tac.LifeSupportModule[FFFA6566][50.57]: OnAwake[LOG 21:28:20.747] RemoteTech: ModuleSPU: OnDestroy[LOG 21:28:20.747] RemoteTech: ModuleRTAntenna: OnDestroy[LOG 21:28:20.750] PartLoader: Compiling Part 'Tantares/Parts/ATV/Capella_Engine_A/part/Capella_Engine_A'[WRN 21:28:20.754] PartLoader Warning: Variable oldMaxTemp not found in Part[WRN 21:28:20.754] PartLoader Warning: Variable tempMult not found in Part[LOG 21:28:20.759] MMH not found in resource database. Propellant Setup has failed.[EXC 21:28:20.760] NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object ModuleEnginesFX.SetupPropellant () ModuleEnginesFX.OnLoad (.ConfigNode node) PartModule.Load (.ConfigNode node) Part.AddModule (.ConfigNode node) PartLoader.ParsePart (.UrlConfig urlConfig, .ConfigNode node) PartLoader+.MoveNext ()Edit:I managed to fix the issue by deleting the following files:Tantares\Tantares_Extra_RealFuels.cfgTantaresLV\TantaresLV_Extra_RealFuels.cfgDeleting the first one fixed the first issue, but Module Manager got stuck again shortly after. Deleting the second one managed to load into the game fine. Since I don't use RealFuels, I don't care for these files, but I suspects they might be the cause of the issue I was having. I hope it helps. Thanks for bug report! I'm gonna check it out and make a quick fix! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djolox Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Oh g-d, *Nicholas Cage impression* not the khleb, not the khleb! My real name is Gleb, so yeah, in school I was often called "bread", since it's just one letter away. Not to be offtop, I'm congratulating Beale on the release of AB Launchers (if someone haven't seen, check'em: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/106687-WIP-AB-Launchers-0-1-5m-Energia-parts-7-Feb) and the grand Gemini reveal. I'm currently balancing the N-1 for the TLV pack and SXT, so I will have lots of numbers soon. - - - Updated - - -Thanks for bug report! I'm gonna check it out and make a quick fix!In Serbian it is HlebSerbian and Russian so similar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrisK Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Oh g-d, *Nicholas Cage impression* not the khleb, not the khleb! My real name is Gleb, so yeah, in school I was often called "bread", since it's just one letter away. Now I want a Gleb Kerbal in honor of Niemand303. Beale, do any of the new Tantares parts need TAC configuration files? Also, did you wind up using the TST water purifier, air purifier, etc. on the Salyut parts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Niemand303 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Now I want a Gleb Kerbal in honor of Niemand303. Hey, you're making me blush. Better name a Kerbal after Beale, he does a much better job! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamerboy67664 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Pavonis (V2) Command Module is also good for a R-7 WarheadCheers, flamerboy67664/SpaceEagle Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrisK Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Hey, you're making me blush. Better name a Kerbal after Beale, he does a much better job! Beale Kerman is long since dead. Maybe he will live again in my next career game. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biohazard15 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 (edited) Awesome Gemini!Also, there is no RT support for both Venera and V2. Fixed that for ya:@PART[Fomalhaut_Control_A]:NEEDS[RemoteTech]{ MODULE { name = ModuleSPU } MODULE { name = ModuleRTAntennaPassive TechRequired = unmannedTech OmniRange = 3000 TRANSMITTER { PacketInterval = 0.3 PacketSize = 2 PacketResourceCost = 15.0 } }}@PART[Fomalhaut_Science_A]:NEEDS[RemoteTech]{ !MODULE[ModuleDataTransmitter] {} %TechRequired = flightControl %MODULE[ModuleRTAntenna] { %IsRTActive = true %Mode0OmniRange = 0 %Mode1OmniRange = 500000 %EnergyCost = 0.01 %TRANSMITTER { %PacketInterval = 0.3 %PacketSize = 2 %PacketResourceCost = 15.0 } } %MODULE[ModuleSPUPassive] {}}@PART[PSR_Control_A]:FOR[RemoteTech]{ %MODULE[ModuleSPU] { } %MODULE[ModuleRTAntennaPassive] { %TechRequired = start %OmniRange = 500000 } }}Venera's antenna has a range of 500km, so you'll need a relay satellite on orbit (its orbital module, presumably)V2 has a built-in antenna with a range of 500km, so you won't need to add another parts. Edited February 7, 2015 by biohazard15 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pTrevTrevs Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Thanks to the awesome Tantares Revamp, I can now go back to what I like best: Space-Station-Building http://imgur.com/a/TCnkaThanks again Beale, the Gemini looks really good!How did you make the double layered fairing?!?Also, I made a launch tower for the V2. nowhere near as impressive as my R-7 Towers, but then again, the V2 was nowhere near as impressive as the R-7 either:DThis one doesn't use any mods besides Tantares itself, but as a consequence, the V2 likes to collide with the tower every now and then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billbobjebkirk Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Beale, would it be possible to add some LK-700 landing gear? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 7, 2015 Author Share Posted February 7, 2015 NOOOOO!if only there were a suitable OM, then I could make one with recolored tantares stuff and PFA Spektr OM could be a good fit, Consider the D2 would have been a bit bigger than a Soyuz (I think?).Beale! I'm so happy! Sad of course to hear that the Apollo D2 is discontinued (Long live the D2!) but this new little Tantini (Gemares?) is such a good replacement. Between that, the VA pod, and the Spektr pod it is possible to have a really good progression of spacecraft outside of the Vostok, Zond, Soyuz line. I'm very excited! Also, for my taste I kind of prefer the smaller windows; Soviet spacecraft have never seemed to be too concerned with that sort of thing. Obviously this isn't a real Soviet spacecraft though!You always do such a good job making replicas of spacecraft; it's great to see you branching out a bit into your own designs with the Spektr and this little guy.Many thanks for the kind words! Thanks to the awesome Tantares Revamp, I can now go back to what I like best: Space-Station-Building http://imgur.com/a/TCnkaThanks again Beale, the Gemini looks really good!Is that an ISS?Sweet!The guys in Lubyanka are starting to get nervous... Is comrade Beale Khlebovich now working for the kapitalist pigdogs?(Just kidding! Superb work Beale!)The Gemini blueprints were "liberated" from our American friends, don't worry I have not defected Not to be offtop, I'm congratulating Beale on the release of AB Launchers (if someone haven't seen, check'em: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/106687-WIP-AB-Launchers-0-1-5m-Energia-parts-7-Feb) and the grand Gemini reveal. Many thanks! Pavonis (V2) Command Module is also good for a R-7 Warheadhttp://i1243.photobucket.com/albums/gg559/bien_vincent/screenshot250_zpsm84nmr4u.pngCheers, flamerboy67664/SpaceEagleI did notice that, it would need a slight texture edit to fit better Awesome Gemini!Also, there is no RT support for both Venera and V2. Fixed that for ya:@PART[Fomalhaut_Control_A]:NEEDS[RemoteTech]{ MODULE { name = ModuleSPU } MODULE { name = ModuleRTAntennaPassive TechRequired = unmannedTech OmniRange = 3000 TRANSMITTER { PacketInterval = 0.3 PacketSize = 2 PacketResourceCost = 15.0 } }}@PART[Fomalhaut_Science_A]:NEEDS[RemoteTech]{ !MODULE[ModuleDataTransmitter] {} %TechRequired = flightControl %MODULE[ModuleRTAntenna] { %IsRTActive = true %Mode0OmniRange = 0 %Mode1OmniRange = 500000 %EnergyCost = 0.01 %TRANSMITTER { %PacketInterval = 0.3 %PacketSize = 2 %PacketResourceCost = 15.0 } } %MODULE[ModuleSPUPassive] {}}@PART[PSR_Control_A]:FOR[RemoteTech]{ %MODULE[ModuleSPU] { } %MODULE[ModuleRTAntennaPassive] { %TechRequired = start %OmniRange = 500000 } }}Venera's antenna has a range of 500km, so you'll need a relay satellite on orbit (its orbital module, presumably)V2 has a built-in antenna with a range of 500km, so you won't need to add another parts.Many thanks, these are great!I've been playing without RT so I would not notice this things.Beale Kerman is long since dead. Maybe he will live again in my next career game.How did you make the double layered fairing?!?Also, I made a launch tower for the V2. nowhere near as impressive as my R-7 Towers, but then again, the V2 was nowhere near as impressive as the R-7 either:Dhttp://i.imgur.com/BYudKEL.jpgThis one doesn't use any mods besides Tantares itself, but as a consequence, the V2 likes to collide with the tower every now and then.I too would very much like to know about the fairings!The launch tower is too cute! I will try this.Beale, would it be possible to add some LK-700 landing gear?The new LK will be needing custom landing legs, so hopefully I will get the hang of how to make them things. Maybe.Parachute/RCS/Decoupler.Yes all three, it is a bit of a niche part!The design of the "docking port" is a bit of a sticky point, but it's coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Djolox Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 What ISP Do you recommend for the Pavonis? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beale Posted February 7, 2015 Author Share Posted February 7, 2015 What ISP Do you recommend for the Pavonis?For long range ICBM / tiny payload orbital rocket, try maybe: 290/370?Should work OK TantiniUsing a mockup TKS "Skirt". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chadley123 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 (edited) Hey Beale, you should make a LES that fits your lovely new Gemini as well as the Mk. 1 pod so we can do Mercury missions in an early career game. Love the texture on that Gemini pod!Maybe something like this Edited February 7, 2015 by Chadley123 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasmic Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Where is the part in the foreground of this picture (the one the Kerbal is holding on to) from? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biohazard15 Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Hey Beale, you should make a LES that fits your lovely new Gemini as well as the Mk. 1 pod so we can do Mercury missions in an early career game. Love the texture on that Gemini pod!http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/5b/Mercury_Capsule2.png/285px-Mercury_Capsule2.pngMaybe something like thisGemini, along with Vostok, were the only spacecrafts that had ejection seats as "LES".(Well, at least it's better than Space Shuttle, which has virtually no LES at all - the whole idea of parachuting out of it sounds mad. Even for KSP.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billbobjebkirk Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 Where is the part in the foreground of this picture (the one the Kerbal is holding on to) from?looks like a procedural part with this texture pack: http://forum.kerbalspaceprogram.com/threads/94606-JebediahKerman42-s-Procedural-Part-Textures%21 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kibble Posted February 7, 2015 Share Posted February 7, 2015 (edited) You should make the forward piece of the Gemini nose section work like a standard four-way RCS, and make the rear bit just a Tantares-style decoupler/parachute, but .625 size. That would make both pieces more useful for building non-Gemini craft, especially because the "docking port" function of the front bit would have no use unless there was Agena.EDIT - Oh and are there going to be separate reentry and equipment modules? Edited February 7, 2015 by Kibble another question Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.