Jump to content

non-biological life possible?


KerbMav

Recommended Posts

I placed this under biology, although I am going to ask for the exact opposite.

Has there been a scientific (!) theory to the existence of non-biological life?

Especially Star Trek is full of sentient clouds, thinking energy particles and living rocks.

How feasible is this idea and has anyone some papers at hand?

Edited by KerbMav
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Depends on a definition of "life" you choose.

Some definitions allow calling basic self-replicating robots "alive", so in a way: we are already able to produce living... beings.

But it's kinda like.... if you can't achieve something it means that it's a time to change our definition of it. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If something is alive, it is by definition biological. Biology is the study of life.

yes but most will not see and robot who makes copies of itself alive.

More since it will be robots who build and run a factory making more robots.

More fun is that its probably the kind of intelligent life we will have first contact with.

The other probable scenario is a stone age people. http://th04.deviantart.net/fs70/PRE/f/2012/177/5/4/first_contact_5_by_olsen1a-d54w8yu.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he meant inorganical life

Yes, thank you.

And I also did not mean robots or any other A.I., but naturally developed life completely different from what developed on our planet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess he meant inorganical life

That's the same kind of terminology problem. Anything related to an organism is organic, no matter what chemistry the organism uses.

To get off the pedantry train and add something more useful, I don't think there's any real reason that life has to use the carbon-based energy that we're used to here on Earth. Any exothermic reaction could conceivably be the basis for life.

I expect that within my lifetime machines/AI will meet all the classic criteria for life, whether people choose to regard it as such or not. (Edit: I hadn't read your post above when I wrote this, not really relevant to what you want to discuss)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I can think of would be something involving intrinsic semiconductors.

Intrinsic semiconductors are naturally occurring elements within nature.

It's more SciFi than real, but maybe if you had a planet covered in silicon and/or germanium crystals with some lighting thrown in...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I can think of would be something involving intrinsic semiconductors.

Intrinsic semiconductors are naturally occurring elements within nature.

It's more SciFi than real, but maybe if you had a planet covered in silicon and/or germanium crystals with some lighting thrown in...?

Good direction to take on this I think...

After all, even Nuclear Reactors can form naturally (Only one here on earth, go google, it's very interesting!) so why not other inorganic biological phenomena? O.k, it would be extremely rare, even in a universe as vast as ours, but the possibility is out there... some sort of planet or other space object, riddled with caves, the veins of ores forming a rouch neural network that could possibly hold the ability of self-awareness, if nothing else (after all, even plants rect to their surroundings, even if in a very limited way...)

I think, also, that this could devolve into more of a Sci-Fi Theory thread, than a 'proper' discussion about Biology/Inorganic or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Presuming any physical mechanism can be a) simulated or B) replicated via another mechanism, then yes.

That is to say, if you ran a computer running and exact simulation of the real world, it would contain "life" and be "non-biological". The other example is that you could copy such mechanisms and do it with robots. These are two theoretical options, but both would require a lot more resources than biology manages with just the atoms we are made of. :)

The other question is if life can exist on a different type of biology. I would assume no, as if it could, we would see it here too (or nearby in our own solar system).

PS, for example, the moon shows no silicon life, etc.

PPS, Cmdr. Arn1e that tunnel would seem to fall into the definition of even more less likely than a Boltzmann brain: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boltzmann_brain

As with the example above of a computer simulation. If it's more complex than the least likely solution, it's less likely to happen...

Edited by Technical Ben
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only thing I can think of would be something involving intrinsic semiconductors.

Intrinsic semiconductors are naturally occurring elements within nature.

It's more SciFi than real, but maybe if you had a planet covered in silicon and/or germanium crystals with some lighting thrown in...?

No. You need a liquid medium for life to occur simply because the reaction rate and other wonders of physical chemistry will not happen in solids.

This is not earthbiology-centrism. This is basics of chemistry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A basic requirement for something to be considered alive is that it have a metabolism. Bacteria are alive; fire is not. Viruses are probably not alive by this definition, even though they borrow a metabolism now and then. The silicone cave intelligence is interesting as an example of intelligence without life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Viruses are probably not alive by this definition, even though they borrow a metabolism now and then.

By that definition, computer viruses would be the first non-biological organism, as they rely on hosts tokeep their "metabolism" stable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3D printed von newman machine.

First part is bluebrints for a 3D printer that can print the components for itself.

Second part is a 3D printable resource collecter, that can keep the 3D printer supplied with what it needs.

Third part is a 3D printable assembler, capable of assembling all 3 parts from what the 3D printer produces. (combining this with the printer makes the printer VERY complicated, which is why I separate it)

Start with 1 of each, and let the population explode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the same kind of terminology problem. Anything related to an organism is organic, no matter what chemistry the organism uses.

That does sound logical, but thats not the way the English-Scientific language has evolved.

Now the meaning of organic basically means carbon containing. There are many "organic" compounds that were never made in a biological organism. Likewise, there are some compounds produced by organisms that are not considered "organic"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_compound

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organic_chemistry

I think it would be best to ask if it is possible to have non-cellular life.

Ie, life that does not consist of solvents enclosed in membranes, wherein the metabolic activity takes place on or inside the membrane

Edited by KerikBalm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By that definition, computer viruses would be the first non-biological organism, as they rely on hosts tokeep their "metabolism" stable.

Metabolism and 'metabolism' are not the same thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3D printed von newman machine.

First part is bluebrints for a 3D printer that can print the components for itself.

Second part is a 3D printable resource collecter, that can keep the 3D printer supplied with what it needs.

Third part is a 3D printable assembler, capable of assembling all 3 parts from what the 3D printer produces. (combining this with the printer makes the printer VERY complicated, which is why I separate it)

Start with 1 of each, and let the population explode.

Unless that machine has the ability to recycle waste using an energy source, it's nothing more than a fancy, glorified physical reaction taking place, like crystalization of the saturated solution. Once the solvent is gone and all of the solute is in crystals, everything stops.

Kind of like something insane made of redstone in Minecraft.

I highly recommend watching this video to everyone, to help with understanding how is life different from a simple chemical reaction.

https://archive.org/details/mars_chemistry_looks_at_life

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read somewhere that it's technically possible for dust/plasma clouds to form self-replicating structures, if sustained appropriately and not dispersed.

I don't see how that could be possible. Even if I did, objects similar to coacervates (but on a much grander scale) would be basically impossible to imagine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...