Jump to content

these new highly sophisticated, budget-friendly landing gears


Franklin

Recommended Posts

50T3ZMs.jpg

$25 a pop (compared to the LT-1s @ $240), making 9 of them still cheaper than a single LT-1, with a far better crash tolerance (read: landing tolerance) than all other gears.

They are 2.4x as heavy as the LT-1s, but at 0.36t for a three-piece it's not really worth concerning about with beginner missions.

I can't even begin to imagine how Squad's going to balance everything. I hope they come up with an interesting algorithm and not just nudge up and nudge down values as players moan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is a beginner supposed to have the education and skill level so early in the game to craft such a complicated and precise landing gear? This is Kerbal dude.. Not Lockheed Martins garage.. :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the same thing for takeoff stability lol

Test those solid fuel boosters: stack 3 ontop of eachother with a rocket ontop to grab the orbit contract and topple over.

Glad I stuck to taking a ton of pics for the log :P

uPJdayU.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the same thing for takeoff stability lol

Test those solid fuel boosters: stack 3 ontop of eachother with a rocket ontop to grab the orbit contract and topple over.

Glad I stuck to taking a ton of pics for the log :P

http://i.imgur.com/uPJdayU.png

i gotta say one thing for some of those contracts, they've made me tweak the max throttle on boosters for the first time, uh, ever. a 50% booster is gold for those part-testing contracts with height/speed targets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the crash tolerance of boosters is 7m/s, which isn't high enough to always guarantee the part doesn't explode when landing with a Mk16. those girder segments have a tolerance of 80m/s, so i can hit the ground fairly recklessly.

that particular rocket was just a part-testing rocket. "deploy our radial chutes at X metres and get a prize" etc, so i wasn't going far with that rocket anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh my goodness!

S5cDr1M.png

You have the finest and most efficient piece of technology that I have ever enkountered!

This is a very intriguing technology that should be integrated onto all crafts that have the landing capability. This technology is never seen before!

I applaud you young man for what you've done, you deserve a kobel piece prize!

That is very efficient!

OOH MY!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are 2.4x as heavy as the LT-1s, but at 0.36t for a three-piece it's not really worth concerning about with beginner missions.
But lander-stage weight effects your over-all Delta-V. So I think your costs winnings here quickly are countered by extra fuel and other part costs.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is quite old. Please consider starting a new thread rather than reviving this one.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...